통일 후 북한지역 몰수토지의 반환 및 보상에관한 연구 = A Study on the Restitution and the Compensation of Confiscated Land Parcel in North Korea after Reunification

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

If a discussion on the problem of the constitution of unification was begun in earnest, it would not be hard to predict that the problems related to the reform of North Korean land ownership system and the processing of former land ownership would become the biggest issue. As one can see, the South and the North have established the extremely heterogeneous land policies through the separate land reforms after the establishment of their respective regimes. North Korea disapproves all of individual ownerships for the means of production including land and only approves the ownerships of the state and cooperative organizations. On the other hand, since South Korea guarantees the ownership of land as a basic individual right by the constitution, ownership disputes as to the confiscated land in North Korea will be inevitably raised even after unification. Therefore, it would be important to plan a new land system by integrating the two legal systems, which were founded based on the different ideologies and systems, for thorough preparation of unification. However, it would be still imperative to resolve the problem about how the land of original owners, whose land was robbed by the land reform, should be processed as the first consideration.
The current constitution states the principle of "just compensation" for expropriated land. However, it is directly related to the costs of unification; thus, it would be required to examine whether it would be possible to apply equally such interpretation in the process of unification. The problem related to return or compensation to original owners in regard with the land reform of North Korea after unification will likely have a profound impact on the speed of economic recovery in North Korea and also the social integration of the two Koreas depending on the type of resolution. Being aware of such problem, this study examined North Korea's current legal system for land that was fundamentally different from the land system of South Korea through exploring the process of North Korea's land reform historically (Ⅱ.) and reviewed whether there exists an obligation for compensation by the unified Korea as to the confiscated land of North Korea. On that account, this study aimed to seek an appropriate solution by examining the method, extent and subjects of compensation for confiscated land in connection with the interpretations of Paragraph 3 of Article 23 of the constitution (Ⅲ.).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2005

2 이부하, "헌법영역에서 기본권보호의무" 한국비교공법학회 8 (8): 123-140, 2007

3 박균성, "행정법론(상) 제10판" 박영사 2011

4 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2008

5 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2009

6 조영진, "한반도 통일토지정책" 중앙경제 1999

7 김상용, "통일후의 토지법의 전망과 과제" 10 : 1994

8 鄭永和, "통일후 북한의 재산권 문제에 관한 헌법적 연구" 서울大學校 大學院 1995

9 배병일, "통일한국의 토지소유제도 개편방안" 4 (4): 1993

10 홍완식, "통일한국의 토지관련 헌법정책" 한국토지공법학회 42 : 1-19, 2008

11 표명환, "통일한국에서의 재산권보장의 헌법적 과제" 한국토지공법학회 39 : 611-633, 2008

12 윤혜정, "통일에 대비한 효율적 국토개발 방안(하)" (단일) : 1993

13 최철호, "통일과 북한지역의 토지정책" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 151-176, 2009

14 명순구, "통일 후 토지소유권의 재편방향: 소유권회복의 장애" (42) : 2004

15 김병기, "통일 후 북한지역 국유재산 해체를 위한 법적 방안" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (32) : 55-82, 2012

16 제성호, "통일 후 바람직한 토지정책방향" 29 (29): 2005

17 표명환, "입법자의 기본권보호의무와 헌법적 통제" 한국헌법학회 11 (11): 211-241, 2005

18 김창록, "일본제국주의의 헌법사상과 식민지 조선" (14) : 1993

19 김민배, "월남자와 북한의 토지 그리고 통일" 6 (6): 1993

20 홍정선, "신행정법입문제4판" 박영사 2011

21 김병기, "북한지역 몰수재산권의 원상회복 여부에 관한 고찰" 4 : 1997

22 윤기택, "북한의 토지제도와 통일 후의 처리방안 - 토지이용권을 중심으로 -" 한국법학회 (47) : 123-149, 2012

23 임병윤, "북한의 토지소유제도에 관한 연구" 5 : 1998

24 이부하, "북한의 토지법제와 통일 후 북한 토지소유권의 해결" 법학연구소 13 (13): 59-85, 2012

25 최종고, "북한법" 박영사 2001

26 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소, "북한경제통계자료집" 한림대학교 출판부 1994

27 김영윤, "북한 토지소유제의 전개과정" 1996

28 김영윤, "북한 토지소유제도 개편과 구토지 소유권 처리 문제" 1997

29 이원우, "민족통합의 역사와 과제: 제2부- 남북통합의 법적과제와 민족통합;통일 후 소련군정하 몰수토지의 소유권반환 및 보상에 관한 법적 문제-독일의 경험과 교훈" (단일) : 2000

30 김종구, "미국 연방대법원의 법해석과 텍스트주의" 미국헌법학회 21 (21): 285-311, 2010

31 이효원, "남북교류협력의 규범체계" 경인문화사 2006

32 전강수, "공공성의 관점에서 본 한국 토지보유세의 역사와 의미" 역사문제연구소 (94) : 68-103, 2011

33 Locke, John, "The Second Treatise of Government" Hackett Publishing 1962

34 Kennedy, Robert G., "The Practice of Just Compensation" 1 (1):