The subject of this research includes twelve gymnasts ranking top four who took part in the Ring competition Ⅲ in 2000 Sydney Olympic Game, 2001 World Gynmasdcs Championship in Belgium, 2002 Busan Asian Game the comparative analysis result of their ...
The subject of this research includes twelve gymnasts ranking top four who took part in the Ring competition Ⅲ in 2000 Sydney Olympic Game, 2001 World Gynmasdcs Championship in Belgium, 2002 Busan Asian Game the comparative analysis result of their exercise according to the code of points is the at following.
1. Considering the number of the difficulties exercise constructs m the competition, It was 41 in 2000 Sydney Olympic Game, 41 in 2001 World Gymnastics Championship in Belgium and 40 in 2002 Busan Asian Gam. There was no big difference. In case of bonus point number taken at the difficulties D, E, SE, It was 20 in 2000 Sydney Olympic Game and 2001 World Gymnastics Championship, and 18 in 2002 Busan asian game.
2. In case of Group elments in special requirement, 13 in groupⅢ and 10 m-groupⅡ were indicated in 2000 Sydney Olympic Game and 15 in groupⅣ in 2001 World Gymnastics Championship, and 21 in groupⅣ 2002 Busan asian game, which is the highest. At exercise constructs of ring, it is current trend that strangth and support to elments in groupⅣ regined over 50%.
3. It is showed that all participants got the full bonus points by doing connection exercise constructs. These are higher in 2000 Sydney Olympic Game and 2001 World Gymnastics Championship than 2002 Busan Asian Game.
4. At the compare of swing difficulties versus strength difficulties. swing difficulties was done 52time(which is 43%) and strangth difficulties 68time(which is 57%) therefore we know that strangth difficulties appear more than swing difficulties at the construct of ring exercise.