역량기반 학습성과관리 시스템 설계 및 구현에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to explore the implications of building a competency-based student performance management system for fostering core competencies of agricultural college students by looking at the case of Y University's competency-based student learning performance management system. The establishment of Y University's core competency-based student performance management system took place from 2019 to 2021, through three phases: core competency modeling, Career Path for core competency management, and core competency-based student learning performance management system. First of all, the major curriculum and liberal arts curriculum were developed for each field and the operating system was derived. Next, he established Career Path, a student who linked the professional trade volume of his major. Seventy-four student Career Paths were developed by defining job models for major curriculum development in three families and organizing jobs (counties) after job creation. Finally, a student learning performance management system was established and key competency diagnosis results were utilized to improve employment rates by managing and supporting students' learning performance through Career Path Tracking linked to job competencies and core competencies. Based on the findings of this study, we look at the implications of building a learning performance management system as follows. A close examination of the establishment of a learning performance management system complements the problems of competency-based education.
It further diversifies the internalisation and improvement of competency-based education. In order for the learning performance management system to have a more practical effect on improving the quality of university education. It is important for universities to be fully aware of the developed learning performance management system and to continue to support it by immediately reflecting the need for competency-based education and the needs of rapidly changing industrial environments.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 서론 1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 1
• 1.2 연구의 필요성 3
• 1.3 논문의 구성 5
• II. 이론적 배경 6
• 2.1 학습 성과 6
• 2.2 대학 핵심역량 8
• 2.3 대학 핵심역량 진단시스템 12
• III. 역량기반 학습성과관리 시스템 13
• 3.1 학습성과관리 시스템 구현 배경 13
• 3.2 직무역량 및 핵심역량 기반 교육과정 개발 16
• 3.3 Career Path 적용 18
• 3.4 제안 시스템 설계 20
• 3.4.1 제안 시스템 개발 절차 21
• 3.4.2 시스템 구성도 22
• 3.4.3 세부 시스템 모듈 24
• Ⅳ. 제안 시스템 구현 27
• 4.1 제안 시스템 구현 목적 27
• 4.2 데이터베이스 설계 28
• 4.3 주요 구현 화면 31
• 4.3.1 교과목 프로파일 관리 31
• 4.3.2 교육과정 관리 32
• 4.3.3 CQI 평가 설문관리 33
• 4.3.4 핵심역량 진단 34
• 4.3.5 직무역량 진단 34
• 4.3.6 Career Path 이수율 35
• 4.3.7 핵심역량 지수 36
• 4.3.8 직무역량 지수 37
• Ⅴ. 제안 시스템 평가 38
• 5.1 평가 일반 38
• 5.2 제안 시스템 사용 개선 효과 40
• Ⅵ. 결론 및 향후 연구방향 42
• 참고문헌 45
• Abstract 50
• 감사의 글 52