RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Effects of high-frequency, highintensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus intravenous opioids for pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105944137

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: The aim of the study was to compare the pain relieving effect and the time spent in the recovery unit after treatment with high frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or intravenous (IV) opioids after ...

      Background: The aim of the study was to compare the pain relieving effect and the time spent in the recovery unit after treatment with high frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or intravenous (IV) opioids after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
      Methods: All patients who postoperatively reported visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score ≥ 3 were consecutively included in the study. The TENS treatment was given with a stimulus intensity between 40–60 mA during 1 minute, repeated once if insufficient pain relief. In the opioid group, a maximum dose of 10 mg morphine was given IV. If the patient reported insufficient pain relief (VAS ≥ 3) on the assigned treatment, the patient crossed over to the other treatment group.
      Results: Ninety-three women were randomized to TENS (n = 47) or IV opioids (n = 46). Both groups reported significant pain relief at leave from the recovery unit (TENS group: VAS 5.4 to 1.0, P < 0.001; IV opioid group: VAS 5.2 to 1.1, P < 0.001) with no differences between the groups. When only responders, i.e. patients with VAS < 3 after assigned treatment, were compared the TENS responders spent significantly shorter time in the recovery unit (90 vs. 122 minutes, P = 0.008) compared to the responders in the opioid group.
      Conclusions: TENS and IV opioids are both effective treatments for pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
      TENS seems to be preferable for first choice of treatment as the treatment is associated with shorter time spent in recovery unit if the patient responds to the treatment.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Mannheimer C, "Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in angina pectoris" 26 : 291-300, 1986

      2 Erlenwein J, "The influence of chronic pain on postoperative pain and function after hip surgery: a prospective observational cohort study" 17 : 236-247, 2016

      3 Kara B, "The effect of TENS on pain, function, depression, and analgesic consumption in the early postoperative period with spinal surgery patients" 21 : 618-624, 2011

      4 van Dishoeck AM, "Reliable assessment of sedation level in routine clinical practice by adding an instruction to the Ramsay Scale" 8 : 125-128, 2009

      5 Solomon RA, "Reduction of postoperative pain and narcotic use by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation" 87 : 142-146, 1980

      6 Fehintola AO, "Preliminary report of experience with gynaecologic laparoscopy in Ogbomoso, Nigeria" 13 : 17-21, 2016

      7 Aubrun F, "Postoperative intravenous morphine titration" 108 : 193-201, 2012

      8 Alexander JI, "Pain after laparoscopy" 79 : 369-378, 1997

      9 Freynet A, "Is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effective in relieving postoperative pain after thoracotomy?" 10 : 283-288, 2010

      10 Moran F, "Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity" 12 : 929-935, 2011

      1 Mannheimer C, "Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in angina pectoris" 26 : 291-300, 1986

      2 Erlenwein J, "The influence of chronic pain on postoperative pain and function after hip surgery: a prospective observational cohort study" 17 : 236-247, 2016

      3 Kara B, "The effect of TENS on pain, function, depression, and analgesic consumption in the early postoperative period with spinal surgery patients" 21 : 618-624, 2011

      4 van Dishoeck AM, "Reliable assessment of sedation level in routine clinical practice by adding an instruction to the Ramsay Scale" 8 : 125-128, 2009

      5 Solomon RA, "Reduction of postoperative pain and narcotic use by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation" 87 : 142-146, 1980

      6 Fehintola AO, "Preliminary report of experience with gynaecologic laparoscopy in Ogbomoso, Nigeria" 13 : 17-21, 2016

      7 Aubrun F, "Postoperative intravenous morphine titration" 108 : 193-201, 2012

      8 Alexander JI, "Pain after laparoscopy" 79 : 369-378, 1997

      9 Freynet A, "Is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effective in relieving postoperative pain after thoracotomy?" 10 : 283-288, 2010

      10 Moran F, "Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity" 12 : 929-935, 2011

      11 Platon B, "High-frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as treatment of pain after surgical abortion" 148 : 114-119, 2010

      12 Bjersa K, "High frequency TENS as a complement for pain relief in postoperative transition from epidural to general analgesia after pancreatic resection" 20 : 5-10, 2014

      13 Desantana JM, "High and low frequency TENS reduce postoperative pain intensity after laparoscopic tubal ligation: a randomized controlled trial" 25 : 12-19, 2009

      14 Borgbjerg FM, "Experimental pain stimulates respiration and attenuates morphine-induced respiratory depression: a controlled study in human volunteers" 64 : 123-128, 1996

      15 Tokuda M, "Effect of modulated-frequency and modulated-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial" 30 : 565-570, 2014

      16 Silva MB, "Analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy" 91 : 652-657, 2012

      17 Murray S, "An investigation into the 'carry over' effect of neurostimulation in the treatment of angina pectoris" 58 : 669-674, 2004

      18 Bjersa K, "Adjunct high frequency transcutaneous electric stimulation (TENS) for postoperative pain management during weaning from epidural analgesia following colon surgery: results from a controlled pilot study" 16 : 944-950, 2015

      19 Milsom I, "A comparative study of the effect of high-intensity transcutaneous nerve stimulation and oral naproxen on intrauterine pressure and menstrual pain in patients with primary dysmenorrhea" 170 : 123-129, 1994

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼