개방형 자동굴절계를 이용한 조절반응의 타각적 측정

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose : This study measured obiectively the accommodative responses stimulated by push-up method and minus lens method with the NVision-K 5001 open-field autorefractor, and compared the results with previously published data. Methods : Forty-five subiects aged 19 to 29 years (mean 22. 7±2.4 years) participated in this study. Three conditions were used to stimulate accommodation and accommodative responses were measured objectively by NVision-K 5001 : (1) push-up test under binocular viewing condition ; the target was placed at vergence ranging from 0-50 in 1D steps. (2) push-up test under monocular viewing condition ; the target was placed at vergence ranging from 1-50 in 1D steps. (3) minus lens test under monocular viewing condition ; a distant(6 m) target viewed through increasing powered minus lenses from 1-50 in 10 steps. Trial lens calibration procedures were also performed to assess the accuracy of the NVision-K 5001. Results : The calib1·ation of NVision-1< 5001 wilh trial lenses showed linear regression equation which was close to the idea! 1 : 1 line(y = -1.005x + 0.060, r2 = 0.999. p < 0.001). The accommodative responses measured with the NVision-K 5001 for the push-up and minus lens- stimulated accommodation progressively lagged behind the increasing acconunodative stimulus. 8oth push-up methods under monocular and binocular viewing conditions showed significanlly higher acconunodative responses than minus lens method(p < 0.001). Push-up method under binocular viewing condition demonstrated slightly higher accommodative responses compared with monocular condition, but the difference was not significant(p = 0.958). Conclusion : The objective accommodative responses stimulated by push-up and minus lens method and measured with open-field autorefractor showed good agreement with previously published data.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신진아, "안기능과 임상굴절" 한미의학 113-, 2003

2 McClelland JF, "The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative responses" 23 : 243-250, 2003

3 Dirk S, "The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia" 82 (82): 279-285, 2005

4 Wold JE, "Subjective and objective measuremen of human accommodative amplitude" 29 (29): 1878-1888, 2003

5 Stark LA, "Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research" 35 (35): 528-537, 1994

6 Win-Hall DM, "Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger Coincidence Refractometer" 84 (84): 879-887, 2007

7 Anderson HA, "Minuslens- stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age : A study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3" 49 (49): 2919-2926, 2008

8 Rosenfield M, "Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response" 67 (67): 74-79, 1990

9 Millodot M, "Dictionary of optometry and visual science, 6th ed" Butterworth-Heinemann 3-, 2004

10 Wick B, "Convergence accommodation: laboratory and clinical evaluation" 68 (68): 226-231, 1991

11 Rosenfield M, "Comparison of clinical techniques to assess the near accommodative response" 73 (73): 382-388, 1996

12 Davies LN, "Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 /Grand Seiko WR-5100K Autorefractor" 80 (80): 320-324, 2003

13 Ciuffreda KJ, "Accommodation, the pupil,and presbyopia. In BenjaminWJ(ed). Clinical Refraction" W.B. Saunders 77-120, 1998