RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Analyzing the English Definite Articles in L1 and L2 Essays by Seven Sub-Pragmatic Types

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106487880

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study attempted to identify areas of difficulty or need in using the English definite articles (DA) for Korean L2 learners in order to help them grow to the level where they can use them properly. It constructed a mini learner-corpus of twenty-five essays written by students who took an English conversation course at a Korean university; the L2 learners’ DA uses were compared with those of L1 English speakers occurring in a reference corpus extracted from LOCNESS. While the distribution ratio of the sub-pragmatic types were similar in both L1 and L2 texts, the latter showed significantly smaller frequencies overall and by types as well. The underusing tendency remained in basic usages of the DA; the learners seemed to either settle only on the cases that they deemed were safe, such as those confirmed through pre-memorized set-phrases or chunks, or to omit simply. The semantic roles/meanings of the DA need to be explicitly emphasized and evaluated in classrooms. Identifying patterns of DA omission errors is recommended for future studies that will draw far-reaching implications for L2 teaching and learning.
    번역하기

    This study attempted to identify areas of difficulty or need in using the English definite articles (DA) for Korean L2 learners in order to help them grow to the level where they can use them properly. It constructed a mini learner-corpus of twenty-fi...

    This study attempted to identify areas of difficulty or need in using the English definite articles (DA) for Korean L2 learners in order to help them grow to the level where they can use them properly. It constructed a mini learner-corpus of twenty-five essays written by students who took an English conversation course at a Korean university; the L2 learners’ DA uses were compared with those of L1 English speakers occurring in a reference corpus extracted from LOCNESS. While the distribution ratio of the sub-pragmatic types were similar in both L1 and L2 texts, the latter showed significantly smaller frequencies overall and by types as well. The underusing tendency remained in basic usages of the DA; the learners seemed to either settle only on the cases that they deemed were safe, such as those confirmed through pre-memorized set-phrases or chunks, or to omit simply. The semantic roles/meanings of the DA need to be explicitly emphasized and evaluated in classrooms. Identifying patterns of DA omission errors is recommended for future studies that will draw far-reaching implications for L2 teaching and learning.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Yamada, J., "The Use of the English Article among Japanese Students" 13 (13): 50-63, 1982

    2 Celce-Murcia, M., "The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course" Heinle & Heinle 1999

    3 Cho, Y. N., "The Article System of English and Its Theoretical Foundations" 22 : 71-101, 1990

    4 Park, K. H., "The Article Acquisition in English as a Foreign Language"

    5 Kim, L. K., "Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications" 87-114, 2009

    6 김형선, "Learning the Use of the English Definite Article through TV Drama: A Cognitive + Communicative Approach to Grammar Learning" 한국현대언어학회 32 (32): 475-500, 2016

    7 Gillaume, G., "Foundations for a Science of Language(Vol. 31)" John Benjamins 1984

    8 James, C., "Errors in Language Learning and Use" Pearson Education 1998

    9 Hawkins, J. A., "Definiteness and Indefiniteness" Croom Helm 1978

    10 Park, S. M., "Definite Article Use by Korean EFL College Learners" Seoul National University 2001

    1 Yamada, J., "The Use of the English Article among Japanese Students" 13 (13): 50-63, 1982

    2 Celce-Murcia, M., "The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course" Heinle & Heinle 1999

    3 Cho, Y. N., "The Article System of English and Its Theoretical Foundations" 22 : 71-101, 1990

    4 Park, K. H., "The Article Acquisition in English as a Foreign Language"

    5 Kim, L. K., "Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications" 87-114, 2009

    6 김형선, "Learning the Use of the English Definite Article through TV Drama: A Cognitive + Communicative Approach to Grammar Learning" 한국현대언어학회 32 (32): 475-500, 2016

    7 Gillaume, G., "Foundations for a Science of Language(Vol. 31)" John Benjamins 1984

    8 James, C., "Errors in Language Learning and Use" Pearson Education 1998

    9 Hawkins, J. A., "Definiteness and Indefiniteness" Croom Helm 1978

    10 Park, S. M., "Definite Article Use by Korean EFL College Learners" Seoul National University 2001

    11 Hewson, J., "Article and Noun in English" Mouton 1972

    12 Alhaysony, M., "An Analysis of Article Errors among Saudi Female EFL Students : A Case Study" 8 (8): 55-66, 2012

    13 Kim, J. H., "A Study of Errors in the Use of English Definite Article by Korean High School Students" Chonnam National University 2002

    14 Hyon-Phil Shin, "(A)Corpus-based analysis of English definite article used in university student's composition" 연세대학교 교육대학원 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0 0 0
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0 0 0 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼