RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    골프수행자의 수준별 심리적 기술의 차이 분석 = Analysis Difference in Psychological Skill by Playing Levels of Golfers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12161313

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 조선대학교 교육대학원, 2010

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 조선대학교 교육대학원 , 체육교육 , 2010. 8

    • 발행연도

      2010

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      796 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 형태사항

      vi, 45 p. ; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수:조동진
      조선대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      참고문헌 : p.39-41

    • 소장기관
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    ABSTRACT

    Analysis Difference in Psychological Skill by Playing Levels of Golfers


    Se-Young Jeon
    Advisor : Prof. Dong-Jin Cho Ph D.
    Major in Physical Education
    Graduate School of Education. Chosun University


    This thesis aims to an Analysis Difference in Psychological Skill by Playing Levels of Golfers, age and career, and education background by measuring the player's psychological skills that are used in the middle of games or exercising.

    In order for this, 80 golf players are selected from pro golf, prospective and nomal golf players. The totals of 56 questionnaires are used except 24 insincere ones. The questionnaire of 'The Development of a Psychological Skill Scale for Golfers' made by Woo Chan-myeong was used for this study to measure psychological skill of the golf players. According to the purpose of analysis, T-test and ANOVA are applied for the returned questionnaires, and for the future examination, Scheffe test is Used. Following is the results from the analysis and the examination.

    1) difference of psychological skill by age
    Age is high, psychological skill point was high, and uneasiness point is low than group which more than 40 ages is different, and point of the control of a mental image, pride, possession and deffierent surnames regulation was high.

    2) difference of psychological skill by level of education
    for the different psychological skills by level of education , the level of the control of a mental image shows a significant difference in each group but not significant difference is found in other factors.

    3) difference of psychological skill by career
    Psychological skill point was high have much careers, and uneasiness point of career was low in Mr. Lee 10 years, and way of challenge, the control of a mental image and possession point was high.

    4) difference of psychological skill that ensue in function level
    Psychological skill point of pro players was high therefore in function level, and uneasiness point of pro players is low, and point of challenge profit-taking, the control of a mental image, pride and possession was high.
    번역하기

    ABSTRACT Analysis Difference in Psychological Skill by Playing Levels of Golfers Se-Young Jeon Advisor : Prof. Dong-Jin Cho Ph D. Major in Physical Education Graduate School of Education. Chosun University This thesis aims to an Analysis Differe...

    ABSTRACT

    Analysis Difference in Psychological Skill by Playing Levels of Golfers


    Se-Young Jeon
    Advisor : Prof. Dong-Jin Cho Ph D.
    Major in Physical Education
    Graduate School of Education. Chosun University


    This thesis aims to an Analysis Difference in Psychological Skill by Playing Levels of Golfers, age and career, and education background by measuring the player's psychological skills that are used in the middle of games or exercising.

    In order for this, 80 golf players are selected from pro golf, prospective and nomal golf players. The totals of 56 questionnaires are used except 24 insincere ones. The questionnaire of 'The Development of a Psychological Skill Scale for Golfers' made by Woo Chan-myeong was used for this study to measure psychological skill of the golf players. According to the purpose of analysis, T-test and ANOVA are applied for the returned questionnaires, and for the future examination, Scheffe test is Used. Following is the results from the analysis and the examination.

    1) difference of psychological skill by age
    Age is high, psychological skill point was high, and uneasiness point is low than group which more than 40 ages is different, and point of the control of a mental image, pride, possession and deffierent surnames regulation was high.

    2) difference of psychological skill by level of education
    for the different psychological skills by level of education , the level of the control of a mental image shows a significant difference in each group but not significant difference is found in other factors.

    3) difference of psychological skill by career
    Psychological skill point was high have much careers, and uneasiness point of career was low in Mr. Lee 10 years, and way of challenge, the control of a mental image and possession point was high.

    4) difference of psychological skill that ensue in function level
    Psychological skill point of pro players was high therefore in function level, and uneasiness point of pro players is low, and point of challenge profit-taking, the control of a mental image, pride and possession was high.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • ABSTRACT V
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 4
    • 목 차
    • ABSTRACT V
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 4
    • 3. 연구의 가설 4
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 4
    • 5. 용어의 정의 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 6
    • 1. 골프 경기의 특성 6
    • 2. 골프 경기력 구조 7
    • 3. 심리기술훈련의 이해 9
    • 1) 심리기술훈련의 개념 9
    • 2) 심리기술훈련의 필요성 11
    • 3) 심리기술훈련의 실천의 제약 13
    • (1) 심리기술에 대한 전문 지식 부족 13
    • (2) 심리기술은 선천적이라는 선입관 13
    • (3) 시간의 부족 14
    • (4) 심리기술훈련에 대한 잘못된 견해 15
    • 4) 심리기술훈련의 방법 16
    • (1) 심리기술훈련 시기와 시간 17
    • (2) 심리기술훈련의 실천 절차 17
    • 4. 골프와 심리적 요인과의 관계 21
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 23
    • 1. 연구대상 23
    • 2. 조사도구 23
    • 1) 설문지의 구성내용 23
    • 2) 설문지의 신뢰도 23
    • 3. 연구방법 23
    • 4. 자료분석 24
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 24
    • 1. 대상자의 일반적 특성 24
    • 2. 연령에 따른 심리적 기술의 차이 25
    • 3. 학력에 따른 심리적 기술의 차이 28
    • 4. 경력에 따른 심리적 기술의 차이 30
    • 5. 기능수준에 따른 심리적 기술의 차이 32
    • Ⅴ. 논 의 34
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 36
    • 참고문헌 39
    • 부 록 42
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼