한국 무형문화재의 사전적 지식 제공의 현주소와 지향점 ―공공기관 웹아카이브를 중심으로― = The Present Status and Future Objectives in Providing - Dictionary Knowledge of Korean Intangible Cultural Heritages ―Focusing on Web Archives of Public Institutions―

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study pursued to diagnose the present status concerning dictionary knowledge of Korean intangible cultural heritages provided on the web archives of public institutions and to find practical ways to accurately provide dictionary knowledge of Korean intangible cultural heritages. The results of the study are as follows:
First, the definition, category, classification and direction of dictionary knowledge were examined through understanding the current laws relating to Korean intangible cultural heritages. However, except for the Cultural Heritage Administration and several local governments, the definition and standards of intangible cultural heritages have been still provided without applying the current laws, and basic explanations of information on the web archives have been missing, or errors presented as incorrect figures have been found. The recently amended laws and systems should be identified, and the definitions, types, targets, and contents should be quickly revised in applying the amendments.
Second, investigating the causes of these limitations, the reason was revealed to be the combination of the unique historical characteristics of the intangible cultural heritage system, the evolutionary natures of intangible heritages and the public institutions’ system that frequently replaced staff in charge as well as administrative affairs.
Third, it is necessary to establish a nationally-integrated knowledge archive of Korea Intangible Cultural Heritages with balance, unity, completeness, connectivity and comprehensiveness. Also, the knowledge provided by public institutions should be directed towards an archive dam completed with a process of knowledge provision through a systematic procedure, at least complying the directions of publicity with public interest, openness, normativity and value as well as the principles of accuracy, reliability, objectivity and fairness, which would be the fundamentals of providing dictionary knowledge. The central and local governments should cooperate with each other to lead the establishment of the nationally-integrated database with value, public interest, openness and normativity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김윤지, "한국 무형문화재 관련 사전 편찬의 현황 및 방향" 민족문화연구원 (85) : 47-76, 2019

2 김윤지, "인류무형문화유산 등재를 위한 국가무형문화재 가치의 재인식과 쟁점 모색" 한국문화융합학회 38 (38): 201-226, 2016

3 노리코 아이카와-포레, "우수성과 진정성: 한국과 일본의 인간문화재 제도를 중심으로" 국립민속박물관 (9) : 33-43, 2014

4 올가 비아로스톡카, "언어에 거주하기: 무형문화유산의 살아있는 저장소로서 언어적 상호작용" 국립민속박물관 (12) : 17-27, 2017

5 마크 제이콥스, "브뢰겔(Bruegel)과 버크(Burke)가 주는 교훈. 유네스코 무형유산 보호 패러다임에 내재된 암묵적 기준: 협약 이행 10년을 돌아보며" 국립민속박물관 (9) : 85-101, 2014

6 이재필, "국립무형유산원의 아카이브 현황과 향후 정책 방안" 국립무형유산원 (2) : 5-20, 2017

7 이푸, "공예 협력: 항저우 예술공예박물관 클러스터의 분쟁 해결 및 공동체 참여" 국립민속박물관 (12) : 59-75, 2017

8 김윤지, "공공성으로 본 국가무형문화재 제도의 미래지향적 관점과 방향" 한국문화융합학회 42 (42): 827-847, 2020

9 사라 사전트, "고전마술(馬術)과 새로 등장한 공인된 무형문화유산담화의 위험성" 국립민속박물관 (11) : 35-53, 2016

10 송준, "無形文化遺産의 保存과 活用에 대한 小考－전형(典型)의 개념을 중심으로－" 남도민속학회 (17) : 217-241, 2008

11 조린 네이링크, "‘초다양성 ’ 시대의 무형 문화유산 : 변화의 길에 대한 연구" 국립민속박물관 (12) : 157-175, 2017

12 Laurajane Smith, "The Tautology of “Intangible Values” and the Misrecognition of Intangible Cultural Heritage" 10 : 2017

13 Sophia Labadi, "Intangible Heritage and Sustainable Development : Realistic Outcome or Wishful Thinking?" 4 : 2011

14 Harriet Deacon, "Authenticity, Value and Community Involvement in Heritage Management under the World Heritage and Intangible Heritage Conventions" 6 : 2013