RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Transanal Endoscopic and Transabdominal Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Postoperative and Oncologic Outcomes by Using a Case-Matched Analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106845891

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This study aimed to compare short-term postoperative and oncologic outcomes of a transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) to those of a transabdominal robotic TME. Methods: A total of 62 patients with rectal cancer underwent trans...

      Purpose: This study aimed to compare short-term postoperative and oncologic outcomes of a transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) to those of a transabdominal robotic TME. Methods: A total of 62 patients with rectal cancer underwent transanal (n = 26) or robotic (n = 36) TME between June 2013 and December 2014. After case-matching by tumor location and TNM stage, 45 patients were included for analysis. The median follow-up period was 21.3 months. Operative, histopathologic and postoperative outcomes and recurrences were analyzed. Results: Patients younger than 60 years of age were more frequently observed in the robotic TME group (75.0% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.059), but tumor location, cT and cN category, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy were not different between the 2 groups. Estimated blood loss was greater in the transanal group (283 mL vs. 155 mL, P = 0.061); however, the operation time and the rate of a diverting ileostomy and subsequent ileostomy repair were not different between the groups. The proximal resection margin was longer in the transanal TME group (20.8 cm ± 16.0 cm, P = 0.030), but the distal resection margins, involvements of the circumferential resection margin, TME quality, numbers of retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak and voiding difficulty, and recurrence rates for the 2 groups were not statistically different. Conclusion: Transanal endoscopic and transabdominal robotic TME showed similar histopathologic and postoperative outcomes with the exception of the estimated blood loss and the proximal resection margin for a select group of patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Erguner I, "What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma" 23 : 316-319, 2013

      2 Park SY, "Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison" 38 : 1834-1842, 2014

      3 Velthuis S, "Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma" 28 : 3494-3499, 2014

      4 Chen CC, "Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study" 23 : 1169-1176, 2016

      5 Fernandez-Hevia M, "Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery" 261 : 221-227, 2015

      6 Lacy AM, "Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: outcomes after 140 patients" 221 : 415-423, 2015

      7 Kang J, "Transanal specimen extraction in robotic rectal cancer surgery" 99 : 133-136, 2012

      8 Telem DA, "Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series" 27 : 74-80, 2013

      9 de Lacy AM, "Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision (TME)--short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases" 27 : 3165-3172, 2013

      10 Chouillard E, "Transanal NOTES total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer: is anatomy better preserved?" 20 : 537-544, 2016

      1 Erguner I, "What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma" 23 : 316-319, 2013

      2 Park SY, "Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison" 38 : 1834-1842, 2014

      3 Velthuis S, "Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma" 28 : 3494-3499, 2014

      4 Chen CC, "Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study" 23 : 1169-1176, 2016

      5 Fernandez-Hevia M, "Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery" 261 : 221-227, 2015

      6 Lacy AM, "Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: outcomes after 140 patients" 221 : 415-423, 2015

      7 Kang J, "Transanal specimen extraction in robotic rectal cancer surgery" 99 : 133-136, 2012

      8 Telem DA, "Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series" 27 : 74-80, 2013

      9 de Lacy AM, "Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision (TME)--short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases" 27 : 3165-3172, 2013

      10 Chouillard E, "Transanal NOTES total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with rectal cancer: is anatomy better preserved?" 20 : 537-544, 2016

      11 Park YA, "Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup" 24 : 715-720, 2010

      12 Kang J, "The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery" 257 : 95-101, 2013

      13 Jung KU, "Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases" 86 : 403-407, 2016

      14 Rasulov AO, "Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer" 20 : 227-234, 2016

      15 Cho MS, "Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study" 94 : e522-, 2015

      16 Park JS, "S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer" 25 : 240-248, 2011

      17 Halabi WJ, "Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes" 37 : 2782-2790, 2013

      18 Kwak JM, "Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study" 54 : 151-156, 2011

      19 Bianchi PP, "Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes" 24 : 2888-2894, 2010

      20 Ielpo B, "Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study" 10 : 300-305, 2014

      21 Baik SH, "Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study" 16 : 1480-1487, 2009

      22 Trastulli S, "Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome" 14 : e134-e156, 2012

      23 Baek JH, "Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study" 25 : 521-525, 2011

      24 Denost Q, "Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial" 260 : 993-999, 2014

      25 Nagtegaal ID, "Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control" 20 : 1729-1734, 2002

      26 Franklin ME Jr, "Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients" 27 : 127-132, 2013

      27 Luca F, "Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer" 257 : 672-678, 2013

      28 Stevenson AR, "Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: The ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial" 314 : 1356-1363, 2015

      29 Fleshman J, "Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial" 314 : 1346-1355, 2015

      30 Kim JY, "A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery" 19 : 2485-2493, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-03-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-11-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.07 0.06 0.312 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼