RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      "The Messiah of Aaron and Israel": Do We See Single or Double?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105236105

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      At the center of the debate over Qumran messiahship is the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” from the Damascus Document (or CD). One crux of this phrase is whether it designates one figure or two figures. On the one hand, many scholars see ...

      At the center of the debate over Qumran messiahship is the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” from the Damascus Document (or CD). One crux of this phrase is whether it designates one figure or two figures. On the one hand, many scholars see the double messiahship in the phrase, whereas not a small number of scholars challenge this view. The present paper seeks to solve this problem and argues that the phrase refers to two messianic figures. The paper first analyzes the phrase grammatically, then investigates the relevant passages in CD, and lastly examines the evidence from other scrolls and the Hebrew Bible. The discussion focuses mostly on philological aspects.
      First, the paper argues that “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” could be read as referring to more than one figure. Three points are presented: (1) the phrase “the messiah of Aaron and Israel,” if singular, would be intrinsically redundant and awkward; (2) the existence of a distributive construct in Hebrew makes it possible to read “the messiah of Aaron and Israel” as plural; (3) the verb ykpr in CD XIV, 19, which could support a singular reading if it were active, seems to be passive because there is no direct object marker in the context. Second, the phrase “Aaron and Israel” refers to two separate entities rather than one. Third, in CD, the dual leadership of the sacred leader and the secular one prevails not only in the eschatological setting, but also in the past and the present. Fourth, data from other scrolls and the Bible too point to the plausibility of the double messiahship.
      The paper treats only the philological aspect of messiahship in CD, but it is hoped that it serves as a stepping stone for entering into the study of the messiahship of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Judeo-Christian tradition.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍성혁, "메시아 예언 본문들에 나타난 ‘샬롬’(평화)" 한국구약학회 21 (21): 121-152, 2015

      2 정희경, "‘Kipper 행위’ 개념을 통해 본 속죄제(taJ'x;)의 이중적 기능연구에 대한구조비평 텍스트 언어학적 분석: 레위기 4장을 중심으로" 한국구약학회 22 (22): 10-37, 2016

      3 Rowley, H. H., "The Zadokite Fragments and the Dead Sea Scrolls" Blackwell 1952

      4 Collins, John J., "The Scepter and the Star: The Messiahs of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Related Literature(ABRL)" Doubleday 1995

      5 Schniedewind, William M., "The Provo International Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Technological Innovations, New Texts, and Reformulated Issues" Brill 523-536, 1999

      6 Brooke, George J., "The Messiah of Aaron in the Damascus Document" 15 : 215-230, 1991

      7 Abegg, Martin G., Jr, "The Messiah at Qumran: Are We Still Seeing Double?" 2 : 124-144, 1995

      8 Davies, Philip R., "The Dead Sea Scrolls in Their Historical Context" T&T Clark 219-232, 2000

      9 Abegg, Martin G., Jr, "The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment(2 vols)" Brill 325-358, 1998

      10 Vermes, Geza, "The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English" Penguin 2004

      1 홍성혁, "메시아 예언 본문들에 나타난 ‘샬롬’(평화)" 한국구약학회 21 (21): 121-152, 2015

      2 정희경, "‘Kipper 행위’ 개념을 통해 본 속죄제(taJ'x;)의 이중적 기능연구에 대한구조비평 텍스트 언어학적 분석: 레위기 4장을 중심으로" 한국구약학회 22 (22): 10-37, 2016

      3 Rowley, H. H., "The Zadokite Fragments and the Dead Sea Scrolls" Blackwell 1952

      4 Collins, John J., "The Scepter and the Star: The Messiahs of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Related Literature(ABRL)" Doubleday 1995

      5 Schniedewind, William M., "The Provo International Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Technological Innovations, New Texts, and Reformulated Issues" Brill 523-536, 1999

      6 Brooke, George J., "The Messiah of Aaron in the Damascus Document" 15 : 215-230, 1991

      7 Abegg, Martin G., Jr, "The Messiah at Qumran: Are We Still Seeing Double?" 2 : 124-144, 1995

      8 Davies, Philip R., "The Dead Sea Scrolls in Their Historical Context" T&T Clark 219-232, 2000

      9 Abegg, Martin G., Jr, "The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment(2 vols)" Brill 325-358, 1998

      10 Vermes, Geza, "The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English" Penguin 2004

      11 VanderKam, James C., "The Community of the Renewed Covenant:The Notre Dame Symposium on the Dead Sea Scrolls" University of Notre Dame Press 1994

      12 Cross, Frank M., "The Ancient Library of Qumran" Fortress 1995

      13 Xeravits, Géza G., "King, Priest, Prophet: Positive Eschatological Protagonists of the Qumran Library" Brill 2003

      14 Dimant, Devorah, "Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period: Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian Writings, Philo, Josephus(CRINT)" Van Gorcum 483-550, 1984

      15 Craig A. Evans, "Israel’s Messiah in the Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls" Baker Academic Press 85-101, 2003

      16 Nitzan, Bilhah, "Eschatology in the Bible and in Jewish and Christian Tradition" Sheffield Academic Press 132-151, 1997

      17 Ginzberg, Louis, "Eine unbekantte jüdische Sekte" 1922

      18 Hurst, L. D., "Did Qumran Expect Two Messiahs?" 9 : 157-180, 1999

      19 García Martínez, Florentino, "Current Research and Technological Developments on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Conference on the Texts from the Judean Desert" Brill 14-40, 1996

      20 Cross, Frank M., "Current Research and Technological Developments on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Conference on the Texts from the Judean Desert" Brill 1-13, 1996

      21 Ginzberg, Louis, "An Unknown Jewish Sect" KTAV 1976

      22 Waltke, Bruce K., "A nchor Bible Dictionary 5" Doubleday 932-940, 1992

      23 Joüon, Paul, "A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew 2 vols" Pontifical Biblical Institute 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-04-20 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Old Testament Society -> Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies KCI등재
      2017-03-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Old Testament Society -> Korean Society of Old Testament Studies KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.62 0.58 0.788 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼