The relationship between perception and production in L2 English stress acquisition

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  This paper investigated whether L2 learners’ pronunciation difficulties were related to their perceptual deficiency of the target sounds, by conducting experiments on 29 Korean learners’ acquisition of English word stress. It was shown that overall the correct percentage of perception (76.83%) was significantly higher than that of production (55.93%). However, there was no correlation between perception and production, which suggests that second (or foreign) language learners’ good perception abilities do not necessarily reflect their good production abilities, and vice versa. It was also shown that the overall results interacted with suffix class (class 1 or class 2) and lexical class (noun or adjective). Specifically, the participants performed much better with class 2 suffixes (perception 85.4%; production 73.5%) than with class 1 suffixes (perception 68.3%; production 38.4%) across perception and production. As for lexical class, the participants were more likely to perceive main stress target-appropriately when the target words were adjectives than when they were nouns (noun 74.6% vs. adjective 79.1%). However, their production of primary stress was more targetappropriate when the target words were nouns than adjectives (noun 63.8% vs. adjective 48.1%). More specifically, the participants had most difficulty in producing correct stress when the targets were class 1 adjectives, followed by class 1 nouns. The participants’ perception and production error patterns were also analyzed in terms of the number of errors and the distribution of syllable position. Based on the findings of the study, some pedagogical implications for the teaching of English word stress were drawn.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. Introduction
  2. Theoretical Background
  3. Experiment
  4. Results and discussion
  5. Conclusion
  REFERENCES
  Appendix: Perception and Production Test Items
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Flege, "the relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories" 249-289, 1991

2 Archibald, "the Acquisition of Metrical Parameters" 1993a

3 Siegel,Dorothy, "Topics in English Morphology" 1974

4 Janet Robert Johnson, "The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals" 529-555, 1992

5 "The learnability of metrical parameters by adult speakers of Spanish International Review of Applied Linguistics 31" 129-142, 1993b

6 "The acquisition of stress" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 81-110, 1995

7 "The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: lexical storage versus computation of stress" 35 : 167-181, 1997

8 Sheldon, "The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English evidence that speech production can precede speech perception" 3 243-261, 1982

9 Jun, "The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy" 15 (15): 189-226, 1998

10 and Morris Halle, "The Sound Pattern of English" (am) : 1968

11 No, Gyeonghee, "Stress placement and phonological competence of L2 learners" 53 (53): 3-19, 1998

12 Mairs, "Stress assignment in interlanguage phonology An analysis of the stress system of Spanish speakers learning English Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge University Press 260-284, 1989

13 Tarone,Elaine, "Some influence on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology" 18 : 139-152, 1980

14 "Second Language Phonology" Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1998

15 Llisterri, "Relationships between speech production and speech perception in a second language" 4 : 92-99, 1995

16 Beckman, "Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony" 14 : 1-46, 1997

17 Erdmann, "Patterns of stress-transfer in English and German International Review of Applied Linguistics 11" 229-241, 1973

18 Major, "Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of English" 18 : 69-90, 1996

19 Gnanadesikan, "Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 73-108, 2004

20 Lado,Robert, "Linguistics across cultures" University of Michigan Press 1957

21 Davis, "Knowledge of the English non-verb stress difference by native and nonnative speakers" 36 : 445-460, 1997

22 Guion, "Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and lateEnglish-Korean bilinguals" 27 : 503-533, 2005

23 Paul, "From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology The Structure of Phonological Representation" 131-76, 1982

24 Guion, Susan G, "Factors affecting stress placement for English non-words include syllable structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words" 46 : 403-427, 2003

25 Hayes,Bruce, "Extrametricality and English stress" 13 : 227-276, 1982

26 Lacabex, "English vowel reduction by untrained Spanish learners: perception and production" Paper presented at PTLC 2005

27 Guion, "Early and late Spanish-Englishbilinguals acquisition of English word stress patterns" 7 : 207-226, 2004

28 Pater, "Bridging the gap between receptive and productive development with minimally violable constraints" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 219-244, 2004

29 Brown,Adam, "Approaches to Pronunciation Teaching" Phoenix ELT 1995

30 Brire,Emil, "An investigation of phonological interference" 42 : 769-796, 1966

31 Halle, "An Essay on Stress" MIT Press 1987

32 Lee, Borim, "Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals" 28 : 487-513, 2006

33 Derwing, "Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility" 19 : 1-16, 1997

34 Depoux, "A robust method to study stress deafness" 110 : 1606-1618, 2001

35 Kager,Ren, "A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch" Foris 1989