RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Comparative Analysis of the Film and Novel Versions of Lily Bart in The House of Mirth

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104227963

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This essay explores how Terence Davies’s The House of Mirth (2000) decodes femininity through encoding Edith Wharton’s character Lily Bart in The House of Mirth (1905). Applying the notion of “the feminine soul,” which Carl Jung named anima ta...

      This essay explores how Terence Davies’s The House of Mirth (2000) decodes femininity through encoding Edith Wharton’s character Lily Bart in The House of Mirth (1905). Applying the notion of “the feminine soul,” which Carl Jung named anima taken from the Latin, “soul,” this essay aims to show how Davies’s filmic representation twists the novel’s thematic concerns by miscoding the unpopular but powerful truth that Wharton expressed in Lily’s innate power of femininity through her quest for soul. The film follows the major plot line, but it fails to represent the psychological task of the redemption of the femininity that Lily experiences. The film presents Lily as Wharton originally intended: a heroine who “fails” in her traditional role. Wharton refused to have Lily fulfill the role of the traditional novels’ protagonist who is brave, decisive, strong, and accomplished. Wharton set up Lily to fail and to suffer, blocking her at every point in her efforts to realize the social ambitions for which she strives. Wharton, however, made it clear that Lily does not want a conventional notion of success, and it is her very “failure” in the social game that makes Lily a heroine.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Johnston, "Women’s Cinema as Counter-Cinema" Feminist Film Theory 31-40,

      2 Johnson, "We: Understanding the Psychology of Romantic Love" 1985

      3 Mulvey, "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema" Feminist Film Theory 58-69,

      4 Meltzer, "Unconscious" 1995

      5 Jung, C. G, "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology" 1943

      6 Haskell, "The Woman’s Film" Feminist Film Theory 20-30,

      7 Macpherson, C. B, "The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke" 1964

      8 Armstrong, "The Imaginary Puritan: Literature: Intellectual labor, and the Origins of Personal Life" 1992

      9 Wharton, "The House of Mirth" 1-348, 1996

      10 Hancock, "The Girl Within: Touchstone for Women’s Identity" To Be a Woman 55-63,

      1 Johnston, "Women’s Cinema as Counter-Cinema" Feminist Film Theory 31-40,

      2 Johnson, "We: Understanding the Psychology of Romantic Love" 1985

      3 Mulvey, "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema" Feminist Film Theory 58-69,

      4 Meltzer, "Unconscious" 1995

      5 Jung, C. G, "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology" 1943

      6 Haskell, "The Woman’s Film" Feminist Film Theory 20-30,

      7 Macpherson, C. B, "The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke" 1964

      8 Armstrong, "The Imaginary Puritan: Literature: Intellectual labor, and the Origins of Personal Life" 1992

      9 Wharton, "The House of Mirth" 1-348, 1996

      10 Hancock, "The Girl Within: Touchstone for Women’s Identity" To Be a Woman 55-63,

      11 Whitmont, "The Future of the Feminine" To Be a Woman 258-267,

      12 Robert Carroll, "The Bible: Authorized King James Version" 1997

      13 Eisler, "Social Transformation and the Feminine: From Domination to Partnership" 27-37, 1990

      14 Beck, "Self and Soul: Exploring the Boundary Between Psychotherapy and Spiritual Formation" 31 : 25-33, 2003

      15 Zweig, Connie., "Renewing the World: The Feminine and the Future" To Be a Woman 241-243,

      16 Zweig, "Refathering Ourselves: Healing Our Relationships with Men and the Masculine" To Be a Woman 119-123,

      17 Hillman, "Peaks and Vale: The Soul/Spirit Distinction as Basis for the Differences Between Psychotherapy and Spiritual Discipline" 54-74, 1979

      18 De Lauretis, "Oedipus Interruptus" 83-96, 1999

      19 Zizek, "Looking Awry" 1991

      20 Thronham, "Introduction" Feminist Film Theory 53-57,

      21 Hunt, "In the Laps of Mothers" To Be a Woman 64-75,

      22 Davies, "Gillian Anderson, Eric Stoltz, and Dan Aykroyd" 2000

      23 Stein, "From the Liberation of Women to the Liberation of the Feminine" To Be a Woman 38-48,

      24 Lyall, "Film: In a Grim House Far From Her Usual Haunts"

      25 Gates, "Film: A World in a Raised Eyebrow, but How to Film It?”"

      26 Holden, "Film Review: The Not So Discreet Evil of the 1905 Upper Crust"

      27 Goodwyn, "Edith Wharton: Traveller in the Land of Letters" 1990

      28 Connell, "Edith Wharton Joins the Working Classes: The House of Mirth and the New York City Working Girls’ Clubs" 26 : 557-604, 1997

      29 Roy, "Developing the Animus As a Step toward the New Feminine Consciousness" To Be a Woman 138-149,

      30 Neumann, "Depth Psychology and a New Ethic" 1969

      31 Jung, C. G, "Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self" 1959

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-08-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of Literature And Film -> The Korean Association Of Literature and Film KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.26 0.491 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼