RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      On the Ethics of Neuroenhancements and the Use of Race Theory in Biomedical Ethics.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16616731

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Drawing from normative ethics and analytic philosophy of race, this dissertation focuses on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of emerging biotechnologies and novel clinical practices in relation to potentially vulnerable populations....

      Drawing from normative ethics and analytic philosophy of race, this dissertation focuses on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of emerging biotechnologies and novel clinical practices in relation to potentially vulnerable populations. The first two chapters challenge presumptive duties in favor of moral bioenhancements (MBs). Here, MBs are understood as medical interventions that alter human moral cognition – e.g., the use of non-invasive brain stimulation to mitigate aggressive behavior. In Chapter 1, I argue that there is no universal moral obligation to utilize MBs, because the mass utilization of MBs may undermine the moral dispositions they seek to promote through unwarranted differential treatment between enhanced individuals and unenhanced individuals. Chapter 2 zooms in to focus on the obligations owed to and by individuals with psychiatric disorders. I argue that when an individual with a psychiatric disorder can act autonomously and make informed decisions, and when there are viable alternatives to MBs for the prevention of harm, the person with a psychiatric disorder is not obligated to utilize MBs. The second pair of chapters demonstrate how race theory from the analytic philosophy tradition can and should inform discourse in medical ethics and public health policy. In Chapter 3, I use a virtue theoretic framework to construct a decision tree to determine when, if ever, it is morally permissible to use a biological racial classification in medicine. In Chapter 4, I offer a modified version of Jorge L.A. Garcia’s volitional account of racism (VAR) and argue that my modified account is a superior alternative to competing theories of racism when considered in a healthcare context because of its accuracy and comprehensiveness. Though seemingly disparate topics, each chapter aims to promote the just and benevolent treatment of all humans contending with life, death, and health – so, everyone.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼