RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      『불꽃』의 서사학적 재조명 = A Study on the Narratological of Reinvestigation of Blaze

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19646156

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This thesis has an aim to make the essence of humanism to which post-war novel points clear by reading Blaze again. To achieve the aim of this study, first, humanism manifested in Blaze was examined closely by the way of narratology. Approach to Blaze by the way of narratology made us recognize that the reciprocal actions between mankind and circumstances were lack in the story transmitted by the narrator. The logics of the black and white was schematized by dichotomy from the character. So the characters of the world in the story were not able to be tied and gone inside organically.
      In addition to it, it was clear that the recognition of the narration by the narrator who transmitted the story out of the world of the story was poor, too. The characters' recollection and discord of panorama descriptions make the credibility of Blaze weak.
      In short, the fact that characters in this work slumps to one without recognition of reality and to the describer without recognition of description has something to do with the writer, Seonu Whi's recognition of reality. So humanism in Blaze can not be anticipated. It is because the heroic schematization of one sided anti-communism goes against humanism
      번역하기

      This thesis has an aim to make the essence of humanism to which post-war novel points clear by reading Blaze again. To achieve the aim of this study, first, humanism manifested in Blaze was examined closely by the way of narratology. Approach to Blaze...

      This thesis has an aim to make the essence of humanism to which post-war novel points clear by reading Blaze again. To achieve the aim of this study, first, humanism manifested in Blaze was examined closely by the way of narratology. Approach to Blaze by the way of narratology made us recognize that the reciprocal actions between mankind and circumstances were lack in the story transmitted by the narrator. The logics of the black and white was schematized by dichotomy from the character. So the characters of the world in the story were not able to be tied and gone inside organically.
      In addition to it, it was clear that the recognition of the narration by the narrator who transmitted the story out of the world of the story was poor, too. The characters' recollection and discord of panorama descriptions make the credibility of Blaze weak.
      In short, the fact that characters in this work slumps to one without recognition of reality and to the describer without recognition of description has something to do with the writer, Seonu Whi's recognition of reality. So humanism in Blaze can not be anticipated. It is because the heroic schematization of one sided anti-communism goes against humanism

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.51 0.5 0.879 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼