RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      The effect of foreign pressure on liberal policy autonomy: the case of South Korea’s screen quota system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104727870

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzes the major trade talks on films between South Korea and the US since the mid-1980s. It starts from the puzzle that South Korea could successfully maintain its screen quotas until it decided to cut them by half in 2006. The study arg...

      This study analyzes the major trade talks on films between South Korea and the US since the mid-1980s. It starts from the puzzle that South Korea could successfully maintain its screen quotas until it decided to cut them by half in 2006. The study argues that South Korean chief negotiators have used the US pressure to cut screen quotas as leverage in bilateral talks. This proves the point that heightened foreign pressure can enhance the policy autonomy of domestic chief negotiators, by consequence if not by design. Amid the US pressures to scrap the screen quotas, interministry frictions arose among the Ministry of Strategy and Finance (formerly the Ministry of Finance and Economy), the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism (formerly the Ministry of Culture and Tourism), and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (formerly the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade). While bureaucrats from the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism have tenaciously adhered to a preservation of the screen quotas, those from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have continuously cast doubt on this protectionist policy. On the other hand, bureaucrats from the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, far from the other two ministries’ consistent preferences, have altered their actual policy preferences with respect to the screen quotas in the same period. A key goal of this study is to test the following statement: the greater the US pressure to cut the screen quotas became, the wider the range of policy autonomy South Korean chief negotiators would exercise.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hammond, T. H, "Who controls the bureaucracy? Presidential power, congressional dominance, legal constraints, and bureaucratic autonomy in a model of multiinstitutional policy-making" 12 : 119-166, 1996

      2 Gerring, J, "What is a case study and what is it good for" 98 (98): 341-354, 2004

      3 Collier, D, "Understanding process tracing" 44 (44): 823-830, 2011

      4 Aggarwal, V. K, "Undermining the WTO : The case against open sectoralism" Analysis from the East-West Center 1-6, 2001

      5 Chosun Ilbo, "USTR pushes screen quota cut"

      6 Schoppa, L. J, "Two-level games and bargaining outcomes: Why Gaiatsu succeeds in Japan in some cases but not others" 47 : 353-386, 1993

      7 Milner, H, "Trading places: Industries for free trade" 40 (40): 350-376, 1988

      8 Verhoest, K, "The study of organisational autonomy : A conceptual overview" 24 (24): 101-118, 2004

      9 Mulgan, A. G, "The role of foreign pressure (gaiatsu) in Japan’s agricultural trade liberalization" 10 (10): 165-209, 1997

      10 Kim, J. S, "The memory of screen quota"

      1 Hammond, T. H, "Who controls the bureaucracy? Presidential power, congressional dominance, legal constraints, and bureaucratic autonomy in a model of multiinstitutional policy-making" 12 : 119-166, 1996

      2 Gerring, J, "What is a case study and what is it good for" 98 (98): 341-354, 2004

      3 Collier, D, "Understanding process tracing" 44 (44): 823-830, 2011

      4 Aggarwal, V. K, "Undermining the WTO : The case against open sectoralism" Analysis from the East-West Center 1-6, 2001

      5 Chosun Ilbo, "USTR pushes screen quota cut"

      6 Schoppa, L. J, "Two-level games and bargaining outcomes: Why Gaiatsu succeeds in Japan in some cases but not others" 47 : 353-386, 1993

      7 Milner, H, "Trading places: Industries for free trade" 40 (40): 350-376, 1988

      8 Verhoest, K, "The study of organisational autonomy : A conceptual overview" 24 (24): 101-118, 2004

      9 Mulgan, A. G, "The role of foreign pressure (gaiatsu) in Japan’s agricultural trade liberalization" 10 (10): 165-209, 1997

      10 Kim, J. S, "The memory of screen quota"

      11 Carpenter, D. P, "The forging of democratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies 1862–1928" Princeton University Press 2001

      12 Pempel, T. J, "Structural Gaiatsu: International finance and political change in Japan" 32 (32): 907-932, 1999

      13 Choi, W. M, "Screen quota and cultural diversity: Debates in Korea-US FTA talks and convention on cultural diversity" 2 (2): 267-286, 2007

      14 Tansey, O, "Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling" 40 (40): 765-772, 2007

      15 Yesilkagit, K, "Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy" 8 : 137-153, 2003

      16 Kim, D. R, "Political control and bureaucratic autonomy revisited: A multi-institutional analysis of OSHA enforcement" 18 (18): 33-55, 2008

      17 Chosun Ilbo, "No FTA talks until Seoul resumes beef imports: US"

      18 Miyaoka, I, "More than one way to save an elephant: Foreign pressure and the Japanese policy process" 10 (10): 167-179, 2011

      19 Koo, M. G, "Linking domestic decision-making and international bargaining results: Beef and automobile negotiations between South Korea and the United States" 13 (13): 65-93, 2013

      20 Chosun Ilbo, "Korea must choose between FTA and screen quota: US ambassador"

      21 Schoppa, L. J, "Japan and the world" Yale CEAS Occasional Publications 71-99, 2008

      22 Arahata, K, "How did external pressures change Japan’s protectionist farm policies from the Uruguay round to TPP? A surplus transformation curve (STC) analysis" 2011

      23 Welch, E. W, "Effects of global pressures on public bureaucracy: Modeling a new theoretical framework" 33 (33): 371-402, 2001

      24 Putnam, R. D, "Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games" 42 (42): 427-460, 1988

      25 Jin, D. Y, "Cultural politics in Korea’s contemporary films under neoliberal globalization" 28 (28): 15-23, 2006

      26 Aberbach, J. D, "Conducting and coding elite interviews" 35 (35): 673-676, 2002

      27 Koo, M. G, "Competitive regionalism: FTA diffusion in the Pacific Rim" Palgrave 181-197, 2009

      28 Christensen, J, "Bureaucratic autonomy as a political asset" 1999

      29 Chosun Ilbo, "AMCHAM chief urges Korea to embrace free trade"

      30 Lee, T. K, "A structural change of film industry and validity of screen quota" KERI 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.28
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.27 0.381 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼