RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Contemporary Culture of NCAA Men’s Hoops: The Social and Athletic Experiences of Men’s Collegiate Basketball Student-Athletes.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17249691

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      NCAA Men’s Basketball student-athletes experienced heightened levels of public and private scrutiny (Satterfield et al., 2010), mental health disorders (Chang et al., 2020; Watson, 2006), and stereotyping (Haslerig, 2017). The purpose of this ethnography was to discover, illuminate, and understand the means and methods in which these young men navigated athletic and social experiences faced in their unique environment, as well as to investigate these student-athletes general sense of well-being. While the contemporary culture of men’s collegiate basketball served as a backdrop for these student-athletes, the tradition of positive psychology, specifically, Wong (2010)’s Existential Positive Psychology provided a framework for me to appropriately explore and focus the study on the experiences and outlook of these young men. As the researcher, I immersed myself within the walls of a collegiate basketball program in an effort to collect and observe their experiences while describing and presenting a breadth of different participants’ understandings concerning the student-athlete experience as well as challenges within the contemporary culture of high-major collegiate basketball (Bhattacharya, 2017). Questions I hoped to answer included how men’s basketball collegiate student-athletes manage, navigate, and cope with the athletic and social experiences of being part of an elite Division I program. The study also explored how the contemporary men’s basketball student-athlete navigated Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) and the transfer portal in today’s collegiate landscape. Contemporary research is prevalent throughout the academy, especially regarding collegiate student-athletes, their well-being, and mental health (Castadelli-Maia et al., 2019; Hilliard et al., 2020; Prior et al., 2022; Simons & Bird, 2022; Stevens et al., 2024; Weber et al., 2023). However, while most research on collegiate student-athletes, football and other Olympic sports garnered the most attention, there was little to no attention given to men’s basketball. There existed scholarship related to minority student-athletes on college campuses (Kroshus et al., 2023). However, there remained a noticeable opportunity regarding qualitative research related specifically to the highly visible men’s collegiate basketball student-athlete. Over the course of this ethnography, I utilized methods of data collection that included daily active participant and environment observations as well as regular and consistent informal group and individual conversations and interviews. Findings from the study explored the social experiences of 1) coach impact, 2) transitions, including the transfer portal, 3) name, image and likeness, and 4) athletic expectations. Findings from the participants also discovered the social experiences of 1) expectations, including pressure, stigma and social media, 2) players social network, and 3) sacrifice. The implications of this study should inform university and athletic administrative collaboration and athlete-focused program development implementation in order to constructively impact men’s basketball student-athlete’s well-being. Findings from this study may also influence and inform student-athletes and their networks as they navigate the dynamic landscape of high-major collegiate basketball. It is my feeling that student-athletes, athletic staff and higher education administration, as well as coaching professionals are the audiences who need this information.
      번역하기

      NCAA Men’s Basketball student-athletes experienced heightened levels of public and private scrutiny (Satterfield et al., 2010), mental health disorders (Chang et al., 2020; Watson, 2006), and stereotyping (Haslerig, 2017). The purpose of this ethno...

      NCAA Men’s Basketball student-athletes experienced heightened levels of public and private scrutiny (Satterfield et al., 2010), mental health disorders (Chang et al., 2020; Watson, 2006), and stereotyping (Haslerig, 2017). The purpose of this ethnography was to discover, illuminate, and understand the means and methods in which these young men navigated athletic and social experiences faced in their unique environment, as well as to investigate these student-athletes general sense of well-being. While the contemporary culture of men’s collegiate basketball served as a backdrop for these student-athletes, the tradition of positive psychology, specifically, Wong (2010)’s Existential Positive Psychology provided a framework for me to appropriately explore and focus the study on the experiences and outlook of these young men. As the researcher, I immersed myself within the walls of a collegiate basketball program in an effort to collect and observe their experiences while describing and presenting a breadth of different participants’ understandings concerning the student-athlete experience as well as challenges within the contemporary culture of high-major collegiate basketball (Bhattacharya, 2017). Questions I hoped to answer included how men’s basketball collegiate student-athletes manage, navigate, and cope with the athletic and social experiences of being part of an elite Division I program. The study also explored how the contemporary men’s basketball student-athlete navigated Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) and the transfer portal in today’s collegiate landscape. Contemporary research is prevalent throughout the academy, especially regarding collegiate student-athletes, their well-being, and mental health (Castadelli-Maia et al., 2019; Hilliard et al., 2020; Prior et al., 2022; Simons & Bird, 2022; Stevens et al., 2024; Weber et al., 2023). However, while most research on collegiate student-athletes, football and other Olympic sports garnered the most attention, there was little to no attention given to men’s basketball. There existed scholarship related to minority student-athletes on college campuses (Kroshus et al., 2023). However, there remained a noticeable opportunity regarding qualitative research related specifically to the highly visible men’s collegiate basketball student-athlete. Over the course of this ethnography, I utilized methods of data collection that included daily active participant and environment observations as well as regular and consistent informal group and individual conversations and interviews. Findings from the study explored the social experiences of 1) coach impact, 2) transitions, including the transfer portal, 3) name, image and likeness, and 4) athletic expectations. Findings from the participants also discovered the social experiences of 1) expectations, including pressure, stigma and social media, 2) players social network, and 3) sacrifice. The implications of this study should inform university and athletic administrative collaboration and athlete-focused program development implementation in order to constructively impact men’s basketball student-athlete’s well-being. Findings from this study may also influence and inform student-athletes and their networks as they navigate the dynamic landscape of high-major collegiate basketball. It is my feeling that student-athletes, athletic staff and higher education administration, as well as coaching professionals are the audiences who need this information.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼