중국인 학습자의 한국어 재귀사 '자기' 습득 = Acquisition of Korean reflexive caki by Chinese-speaking learners.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigated the acquisition of the Korean reflexive ‘caki’ by Chinese learners of Korean using a picture-sentence verification task. Korean and Chinese reflexivesare different from the English reflexive ‘-self’ in that long distance binding interpretation is allowed (e.g., Maryi thinks that Susanj likes herselfi/j), whereas it is not in English (e.g., Maryi thinks that Susanj likes herself*i/j). However, the Korean reflexive ‘caki’ is different from the Chinese reflexive ‘ziji’ in terms of its preferred interpretation: long distance binding interpretation is more preferred to local binding in Korean, whereas it is the opposite in Chinese. This study focused on how Chinese learners of Korean understand ‘caki’ in Korean compared to Korean native speakers. The results of an experiment based on a picture-sentence verification task with 31 learners (13 intermediate and 18 advanced) and 30 nativecontrols showed that learners accepted local binding interpretation about 70% of the time regardless of their level of general proficiency, whereas native speakers accepted it only 50% of the time. The results indicate the influence of L1 transfer. Other possible influential factors were also discussed such as length of learning and length of residence. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Cyber Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정해권, "한국어 피동문 처리에서의 통사 구조와 빈도의 영향 - 그림-문장 검증 과제를 통한 행동 반응 연구 -" 언어연구소 (58) : 403-426, 2013

2 오경숙, "한국어 재귀사 교육을 위한 문법 내용 연구 - '자기'를 중심으로 -" 이중언어학회 (65) : 131-152, 2016

3 이선영, "한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 처리 기제 -행동 반응 시간을 바탕으로-" 언어연구소 (74) : 229-248, 2017

4 엄홍준, "한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 속성" 한국언어학회 39 (39): 899-919, 2014

5 허세문, "한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근" 사단법인 한국언어학회 (70) : 141-178, 2014

6 박중우, "한국어 {자기}와 중국어 {自己}의 대조 연구" 언어과학회 (76) : 107-130, 2016

7 제효봉, "중국인 학습자의 한국어 재귀표현 사용 양상 연구 - ‘자기’, ‘자신’, ‘자기자신’을 중심으로 -" 국어교육학회(since1969) (48) : 257-286, 2011

8 이선영, "중국인 학습자의 한국어 격조사 처리 연구 : 그림-문장 검증 과제를 통하여" 이중언어학회 (52) : 317-345, 2013

9 박진호, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 대명사 체계의 특징" 국어학회 (50) : 115-147, 2007

10 강범모, "문법과 언어 사용" 31 : 165-204, 1998

11 정해권, "명사류 위계와 한국어 재귀 대명사 : 강조와 언식적 표지의 통시적 발달" 언어연구소 (69) : 189-210, 2015

12 Kum-Jeong Joo, "Who is Caki?: Experimental studies regarding the person feature of the Korean reflexive caki" 언어정보연구소 26 : 385-410, 2015

13 Kemmer, S., "The middle voice" John Benjamins Publishing 1993

14 Clements, G., "The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse" 2 : 141-177, 1975

15 김인석, "The L2 Acquisition of the Korean Reflexive Anaphor Caki by English-speaking College Students within the Framework of Universal Grammar" 7 : 43-72, 1994

16 Liu, Z., "The Cognitive Process of Chinese Reflexive Processing" 37 (37): 1-27, 2009

17 이선영, "The Acquisition of Korean Reflexive Caki by Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners" 한국언어학회 37 (37): 383-400, 2012

18 White, L., "Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar" Cambridge University Press 2003

19 Faltz, L., "Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax" Garland 1985

20 Pica, P., "On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle" 17 (17): 483-499, 1987

21 이금영, "On the Aspects of Reflexive Binding by Chinese and English Learners of Korean" 한국중원언어학회 (40) : 213-237, 2016

22 Huang, C-T. J., "Long-distance reflexives" Brill 141-195, 2001

23 Huang, C-T. J., "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1982

24 Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" Foris 1981

25 김지혜, "Interpretations of Korean Reflexive Binding by Late L2 learners of Korean with English and Chinese L1" 한국언어정보학회 14 (14): 67-91, 2010

26 Yuan, B., "Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers" 14 (14): 324-340, 1998

27 Kim, J. H., "Binding interpretations of anaphors by Korean heritage speakers" 16 (16): 3-35, 2009