RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Figural Margin to the Hegelian Representation  :  The Sun, Flowers, and Signature in Derrida's Glas

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A35492592

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In Glas, Derrida constructs the two columns of philosophy and literature to show how the Hegelian speculative column encounters Genet's more literary one that remains as the total Other to the dialectics itself. The figuration, which is conventionally characteristic of literature, is one of the most important issues that punctuates Glas from the onset. Hegel's column takes the issues of the non-figure and the non-violent figure in the first two stages of natural religion, and Genet's produces a counter-discourse that questions and transforms the very terms of the figuration. In his analysis, Derrida does not simply inverse or subvert the Hegelian dialectical opposition but displaces and locates it in the non-dialectical figure. He tries to interrupt the movement toward Absolute Knowledge by offering the figure not only in Genet's column but also within Hegel's column itself, The dialectics between the two columns is always already haunted by the figure of litertature that can neither contain nor exclude but remains at its margin.
    번역하기

    In Glas, Derrida constructs the two columns of philosophy and literature to show how the Hegelian speculative column encounters Genet's more literary one that remains as the total Other to the dialectics itself. The figuration, which is conventionally...

    In Glas, Derrida constructs the two columns of philosophy and literature to show how the Hegelian speculative column encounters Genet's more literary one that remains as the total Other to the dialectics itself. The figuration, which is conventionally characteristic of literature, is one of the most important issues that punctuates Glas from the onset. Hegel's column takes the issues of the non-figure and the non-violent figure in the first two stages of natural religion, and Genet's produces a counter-discourse that questions and transforms the very terms of the figuration. In his analysis, Derrida does not simply inverse or subvert the Hegelian dialectical opposition but displaces and locates it in the non-dialectical figure. He tries to interrupt the movement toward Absolute Knowledge by offering the figure not only in Genet's column but also within Hegel's column itself, The dialectics between the two columns is always already haunted by the figure of litertature that can neither contain nor exclude but remains at its margin.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • In Glas, Derrida constructs the two columns of philosophy and literature to show how the Hegelian speculative column encounters Genet's more literary one that remains as the total Other to the dialectics itself. The figuration, which is conventionally characteristic of literature, is one of the most important issues that punctuates Glas from the onset. Hegel's column takes the issues of the non-figure and the non-violent figure in the first two stages of natural religion, and Genet's produces a counter-discourse that questions and transforms the very terms of the figuration. In his analysis, Derrida does not simply inverse or subvert the Hegelian dialectical opposition but displaces and locates it in the non-dialectical figure. He tries to interrupt the movement toward Absolute Knowledge by offering the figure not only in Genet's column but also within Hegel's column itself, The dialectics between the two columns is always already haunted by the figure of litertature that can neither contain nor exclude but remains at its margin.
    • In Glas, Derrida constructs the two columns of philosophy and literature to show how the Hegelian speculative column encounters Genet's more literary one that remains as the total Other to the dialectics itself. The figuration, which is conventionally characteristic of literature, is one of the most important issues that punctuates Glas from the onset. Hegel's column takes the issues of the non-figure and the non-violent figure in the first two stages of natural religion, and Genet's produces a counter-discourse that questions and transforms the very terms of the figuration. In his analysis, Derrida does not simply inverse or subvert the Hegelian dialectical opposition but displaces and locates it in the non-dialectical figure. He tries to interrupt the movement toward Absolute Knowledge by offering the figure not only in Genet's column but also within Hegel's column itself, The dialectics between the two columns is always already haunted by the figure of litertature that can neither contain nor exclude but remains at its margin.
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "_______. ?Reading With Another Ear Derrida?s Glas In English.? New Orleans Review 15.3" 198818-29.

    2 "U of Nebraska P" Jacques. Glas. Trans. J. P. Leavey and R. Rand. Lincoln 1986.

    3 Claudette. ?Herbarium, "The Discourse of Flowers.? Diacritics 18.4" 68-81, 1988

    4 Gasch?, "Rodolphe. Inventions of Difference" 1994.

    5 _______. ?White Mythology, "Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy.? Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago U of Chicago P" 1972.207-71.

    6 Todd, "Jane Marie. ?Autobiography and the Case of the Signature" 1-19, 1986

    7 Marsh, "James L. ?The Play of Difference/Diff?rance in Hegel and Derrida.? The Owl of Minerva 21.2" 145-53, 1990

    8 Hegel, "G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford" 1979.

    1 "_______. ?Reading With Another Ear Derrida?s Glas In English.? New Orleans Review 15.3" 198818-29.

    2 "U of Nebraska P" Jacques. Glas. Trans. J. P. Leavey and R. Rand. Lincoln 1986.

    3 Claudette. ?Herbarium, "The Discourse of Flowers.? Diacritics 18.4" 68-81, 1988

    4 Gasch?, "Rodolphe. Inventions of Difference" 1994.

    5 _______. ?White Mythology, "Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy.? Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago U of Chicago P" 1972.207-71.

    6 Todd, "Jane Marie. ?Autobiography and the Case of the Signature" 1-19, 1986

    7 Marsh, "James L. ?The Play of Difference/Diff?rance in Hegel and Derrida.? The Owl of Minerva 21.2" 145-53, 1990

    8 Hegel, "G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford" 1979.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature -> The New Korean Journal of English Language & Literature KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-04-21 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The New Korean Association of English Language and Literature KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.17 0.17 0.18
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.19 0.17 0.441 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼