RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      關於韓·美·日大學與中國相關學系的敎育硏究現況 = A Survey of the Currency in the Departments of Universities in Korea, America and Japan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104525754

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The paper is to analyze and compare the currency of the education and research of chinarelated science through the titles of department and the major fields of faculties in the Chinese departments of Korea, America and Japan. The three countries have all had the tradition of valuing the literature, culture and philosophy of china comparatively. However, in case of Korea, as china has recently enjoyed the economic development and the exchange programs between China and Korea has increased, the tendency to value the general Chinese sciences including her language and culture is reflected in the titles of departments. In America, the Chinese language, culture and civilization can be found to be reflected in the title of departments. As for Japan, the titles of department shows the Chinese literature or language and literature, noticeably with the department of Chinese philosophy in major universities. Through the comparative analysis of the faculties' researching fields, Korea has makes much of the Chinese language and literature and Japan places an emphasis on the Chinese language and literature and philosophy, while America sets much value on the Chinese language, literature and culture. The ground for America's value of the Chinese culture can be found in the great difference between the Eastern and Western culture.
      번역하기

      The paper is to analyze and compare the currency of the education and research of chinarelated science through the titles of department and the major fields of faculties in the Chinese departments of Korea, America and Japan. The three countries have ...

      The paper is to analyze and compare the currency of the education and research of chinarelated science through the titles of department and the major fields of faculties in the Chinese departments of Korea, America and Japan. The three countries have all had the tradition of valuing the literature, culture and philosophy of china comparatively. However, in case of Korea, as china has recently enjoyed the economic development and the exchange programs between China and Korea has increased, the tendency to value the general Chinese sciences including her language and culture is reflected in the titles of departments. In America, the Chinese language, culture and civilization can be found to be reflected in the title of departments. As for Japan, the titles of department shows the Chinese literature or language and literature, noticeably with the department of Chinese philosophy in major universities. Through the comparative analysis of the faculties' researching fields, Korea has makes much of the Chinese language and literature and Japan places an emphasis on the Chinese language and literature and philosophy, while America sets much value on the Chinese language, literature and culture. The ground for America's value of the Chinese culture can be found in the great difference between the Eastern and Western culture.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 李章佑, "하버드 大學의 中國語文學 硏究" 39 : 2002.6

      2 권석환, "韓國의 中國語文學 敎育 硏究의 自體評價와 展望" 第25集 : 2002.12

      3 李鐘振, "韓國의 中國語 敎育現況과 課題" 第42集 : 1999

      4 鄭錫元, "全國大學 中國關聯學科 ( 專攻 ) 의 敎科科程分析을 通한 問題點과 그 對策" 41집 : 2000

      5 李康在, "中國語文學 硏究 敎育者의 現況과 需要 變化의 樣相" 第40 集 : 2003.11

      6 "http://www.yale.edu/eall/"

      7 "http://www.stanford.edu/dept/asianlang"

      8 "http://www.princeton.edu/~eastasia/"

      9 "http://www.lsa.umich.edu/asian/"

      10 "http://www.indiana.edu/~chinlang/"

      1 李章佑, "하버드 大學의 中國語文學 硏究" 39 : 2002.6

      2 권석환, "韓國의 中國語文學 敎育 硏究의 自體評價와 展望" 第25集 : 2002.12

      3 李鐘振, "韓國의 中國語 敎育現況과 課題" 第42集 : 1999

      4 鄭錫元, "全國大學 中國關聯學科 ( 專攻 ) 의 敎科科程分析을 通한 問題點과 그 對策" 41집 : 2000

      5 李康在, "中國語文學 硏究 敎育者의 現況과 需要 變化의 樣相" 第40 集 : 2003.11

      6 "http://www.yale.edu/eall/"

      7 "http://www.stanford.edu/dept/asianlang"

      8 "http://www.princeton.edu/~eastasia/"

      9 "http://www.lsa.umich.edu/asian/"

      10 "http://www.indiana.edu/~chinlang/"

      11 "http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~ealc/"

      12 "http://www.eastasian.ucsb.edu/"

      13 "http://www.ealc.uiuc.edu/"

      14 "http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ealac"

      15 "http://www.alc.ucla.edu/"

      16 "http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/easian/"

      17 "http://lrc.cornell.edu/asian"

      18 "http://ealc.uchicago.edu/"

      19 "http://ealc.berkeley.edu"

      20 "http://depts.washington.edu/asianll/"

      21 "http://deall.osu.edu/"

      22 "http:// www.tufs.ac.jp/"

      23 "http:// www.tohoku.ac.jp/"

      24 "http:// www.osaka?u.ac.jp/"

      25 "http:// www.l.u?tokyo.ac.jp/"

      26 "http:// www.kyushu.ac.jp/"

      27 "http:// www.kyoto?u.ac.jp/"

      28 "http:// www.flet.keio.ac.jp/"

      29 "http:// www. waseda.ac.jp/"

      30 Jack Gourman, "Gourman Report of Undergraduate Program" Random House Inc 1998

      31 김광조, "<와싱턴 大學 亞洲語文學과 紹介>" 1983

      32 "2006 Edition American's Best Graduate Schools" 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.24 0.507 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼