RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      잡음 종류와 잡음 제거방식에 따른 영상의 윤곽선 검출 비교 = Comparison of Edge Detection of Images with Various Types of Noise and Denoising Methods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108565717

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, we show comparison results of edge detection of images that have additive gaussian noise or salt and pepper noise by using various techniques of noise removal such as filtering, morphology and deep learning based ones. In particular, this present work provides comparison results of noise removal by using gaussian filter, open and close operations of morphology and auto-encoder model followed by carrying out edge detection. Robert cross, Sobel, Prewitt and Canny detectors are used for edge detection of the images with noise removal. Experimental results show that noise removal results are different with characteristics of noise and techniques applied for noise removal. In addition, deep learning based technique, auto-encoder does not always shows superior results of noise removal, particularly in the case of existence of salt-pepper noise. In the experiments, gaussian noise or salt-pepper noise is used and peak signal noise ratio (PSNR) is used for quantitative comparison and the results of edge detection is qualitatively compared from visual perspective.
      번역하기

      In this paper, we show comparison results of edge detection of images that have additive gaussian noise or salt and pepper noise by using various techniques of noise removal such as filtering, morphology and deep learning based ones. In particular, th...

      In this paper, we show comparison results of edge detection of images that have additive gaussian noise or salt and pepper noise by using various techniques of noise removal such as filtering, morphology and deep learning based ones. In particular, this present work provides comparison results of noise removal by using gaussian filter, open and close operations of morphology and auto-encoder model followed by carrying out edge detection. Robert cross, Sobel, Prewitt and Canny detectors are used for edge detection of the images with noise removal. Experimental results show that noise removal results are different with characteristics of noise and techniques applied for noise removal. In addition, deep learning based technique, auto-encoder does not always shows superior results of noise removal, particularly in the case of existence of salt-pepper noise. In the experiments, gaussian noise or salt-pepper noise is used and peak signal noise ratio (PSNR) is used for quantitative comparison and the results of edge detection is qualitatively compared from visual perspective.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼