RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Chŏng Yag-yong’s 'One and Only Mind’: in Comparison to B. Lonergan’s Cognitive Process

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103768083

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper focuses on the fact that Tasan Chŏng Yag-yong represents ‘mind’ with ‘ling(靈)’ and then explicates the reason by applying Bernard Lonergan’s cognitive process. Lonergan argued that human achieves the ultimate value and meaning ...

      This paper focuses on the fact that Tasan Chŏng Yag-yong represents ‘mind’ with ‘ling(靈)’ and then explicates the reason by applying Bernard Lonergan’s cognitive process. Lonergan argued that human achieves the ultimate value and meaning through the cognitive processes of experiencing – understanding – judging – deciding / choosing. In so doing Lonergan developed the cognitional theory to elucidate human consciousness. Lonergan’s cognitional theory is developed based on cognitive acts and its content, four cognitive processes immanent within one owns consciousness, and other conscious act that objectify the one’s own conscious acts.
      To apply Lonergan’s cognitional theory on analyzing Tasan’s concept of ‘ling’ helps us to understand that Tasan had profound interest in the structure of mind. As his understanding of it had developed, empty ling (虛靈) - the great constitution(大體) - ling constitution(靈體)’ that appear in his text correspond to the clarification process of his understanding of ‘ling.’From the notion of ‘mind constitution as empty ling (心體虛靈)’ in the Lecture on the Mean (中庸講義 1789, 1814), Tasan’s understanding of ‘mind’ can be seen generally. In ‘the great constitution’ of his Old and New Commentaries of Analects (論語古今註, 1813), he critically deliberates the relation between judgment of value and physical temperaments. In Deep Examination of the Classic of Mind (心經密驗 1815), as the understanding of value judgment transforms into the matter of value practice, the concept of ‘ling’ had been formulated to include preference(嗜好, which is nature 性 in Tasan’s philosophy) toward value, value discernment (權衡, weighing), choosing and practicing values (行事, carrying out events). The concept of ‘ling’ had been standardized in Reply to Yi Yeo-hong (答李汝弘 1816), and Critique of Namloe Hwang Jong-hŭi (南雷黃宗羲序 1827) and in those had ‘the one and only mind’ been mentioned. This paper thus proposes that it can be considered as a capability of consciousness.
      The concept of ‘ling,’ that followed a discovery of the capability of consciousness and its three attributes, has shown the mechanism of consciousness that knows and applies value. Furthermore the universality of the concept of ‘ling’ can be recognized in correspondence with Lonergan’s cognitive process. Most of all the implication of the concept of ‘ling’ is the discovery of the conscious subject that perceives and practices the value. The reason that we could find modern thoughts such as subject, reason, and rationality in Tasan’s thinking is due to his rigorous inquiries into the notion of ‘ling.’

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Chŏng Yak‐yong, "Yŏyudang chŏnsŏ 與猶堂全書 (The Complete Work of Yŏyudang). The following volumes mentioned in the article are included in this book: A Summary Opinion on Mencius 孟子要義; Old and New Commentaries of Analects 論語古今註; Self‐chosen Aphorism on the Mean 中庸自箴; Addition to the Lecture on the Mean 中庸講義補; Deep Examination of the Classic of Mind 心經密驗; Review on the Book of Mae 梅氏書平; Self‐inscribed Epitaph 自撰墓誌銘; Public Opinion on the Great Learning 大學公議; Four Notes on Mourning Rituals 喪禮四箋; Introduction to the Study of the Book of Change 易學緖言"

      2 Lonergan, Bernard J. F., "Works of Bernard Lonergan : Collection, vol.42" Universityof Toronto Press 1993

      3 Keum, Jang‐tae, "Theory of Mind in Choseon Neo‐Confucianism: Debate between Theory of Mind‐Heart and Theory of Soul" Seoul National University Press 2002

      4 Chang, Sŭng‐gu., "Theory of Mind among the scholars of the Realist School of Confucianism during the late Chosŏn period, In Essays of Korean Philosophy 26" Institution for the history of Korean Philosophy 2009

      5 Keum, Jang‐tae, "Tasan’s concept of Mind and Matteo Ricci's Theory of Soul. in Religion and Culture 8" Chongyomunche Yŏn’guso of Seoul National University 2002

      6 Chang, Pok‐tong., "Tasan’s Anthropology from the perspective of Realist School of Confucianism" Chŏnnam University Press 2002

      7 Yi, Ŭr‐ho., "Study on Dasan`s Confucian Classics" Seoul : Eulyoo Publishing Co 1973

      8 Yao, Hsin‐chung, "RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedias of Confucianism, vol.1‐2" Routledge 2003

      9 Flanagan, Joseph, "Quest for Self‐Knowledge: An Essay in Lonergan’s Philosophy" University of Toronto Press 1997

      10 Keum, Jang‐tae., "Mind and Nature: Tasan’s understanding of Mencius" Seoul National University Press 2005

      1 Chŏng Yak‐yong, "Yŏyudang chŏnsŏ 與猶堂全書 (The Complete Work of Yŏyudang). The following volumes mentioned in the article are included in this book: A Summary Opinion on Mencius 孟子要義; Old and New Commentaries of Analects 論語古今註; Self‐chosen Aphorism on the Mean 中庸自箴; Addition to the Lecture on the Mean 中庸講義補; Deep Examination of the Classic of Mind 心經密驗; Review on the Book of Mae 梅氏書平; Self‐inscribed Epitaph 自撰墓誌銘; Public Opinion on the Great Learning 大學公議; Four Notes on Mourning Rituals 喪禮四箋; Introduction to the Study of the Book of Change 易學緖言"

      2 Lonergan, Bernard J. F., "Works of Bernard Lonergan : Collection, vol.42" Universityof Toronto Press 1993

      3 Keum, Jang‐tae, "Theory of Mind in Choseon Neo‐Confucianism: Debate between Theory of Mind‐Heart and Theory of Soul" Seoul National University Press 2002

      4 Chang, Sŭng‐gu., "Theory of Mind among the scholars of the Realist School of Confucianism during the late Chosŏn period, In Essays of Korean Philosophy 26" Institution for the history of Korean Philosophy 2009

      5 Keum, Jang‐tae, "Tasan’s concept of Mind and Matteo Ricci's Theory of Soul. in Religion and Culture 8" Chongyomunche Yŏn’guso of Seoul National University 2002

      6 Chang, Pok‐tong., "Tasan’s Anthropology from the perspective of Realist School of Confucianism" Chŏnnam University Press 2002

      7 Yi, Ŭr‐ho., "Study on Dasan`s Confucian Classics" Seoul : Eulyoo Publishing Co 1973

      8 Yao, Hsin‐chung, "RoutledgeCurzon Encyclopedias of Confucianism, vol.1‐2" Routledge 2003

      9 Flanagan, Joseph, "Quest for Self‐Knowledge: An Essay in Lonergan’s Philosophy" University of Toronto Press 1997

      10 Keum, Jang‐tae., "Mind and Nature: Tasan’s understanding of Mencius" Seoul National University Press 2005

      11 Lonergan, Bernard J. F, "Method in Theology" University of Toronto Press 1990

      12 Lonergan, Bernard J. F, "Insight: A Study of Human Understanding" Harper & Row 1978

      13 Han, Hyŏng‐jo., "Fronm Zhuxi to Chŏng Yag‐yong" Segyesa 1996

      14 Keum, Jang‐tae., "Critical biography about Tasan: An intellectual that loved people" Chisik kwa Kyoyang 2011

      15 Chung, So‐Yi, "Chŏng Yag‐yong’s Theory of Human Nature as Moral Inclination" 147 : 2009

      16 Kang, Jae‐ŏn, "Chŏng Tasan’s View of the Occidental Science and Religion" Minŭmsa 1990

      17 Chŏng, Il‐gyun., "A study on Tasan’s Understanding of the Four Books" Ilchisa 2000

      18 Chung, So‐Yi, "A Study on the transformation of Chŏng Yag‐yong’s theory of Mind‐Heart" 33 : 2009

      19 Yi, Chi‐hyŏng., "A Study on Tasan’s Confucian Classics" Taehaksa 1996

      20 Yi, Sook‐hee., "A Study on Chŏng Yakyong’s Religious Consciousness through the Concept of “Yongche(靈體)” and “Haengsa(行事): In the Perspective of B. Lonergan’s Cognitional Theory" Sogang University 2011

      21 Im, Pu‐yŏn, "A Study on Chŏng Yag‐yong’s Theory of Cultivation" Seoul National University 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 國際版<儒敎文化硏究> -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-06-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute of Confucian Cultural Studies -> Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.04 0.351 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼