RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조직변화에 대한 구성원 저항의 다차원적 접근 = A Study on the Multi-Dimensional Approach of Employee Resistance to Organizational Change

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76440530

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

        조직변화에 대한 구성원 저항과 관련한 선행연구에서 변화에 대한 구성원들의 심리적 정서와 행동이 반드시 일치하지 않을 수 있기 때문에 조직변화에 대한 저항의 다차원적 접근...

        조직변화에 대한 구성원 저항과 관련한 선행연구에서 변화에 대한 구성원들의 심리적 정서와 행동이 반드시 일치하지 않을 수 있기 때문에 조직변화에 대한 저항의 다차원적 접근이 필요함을 제시하였다. 즉 변화에 대한 저항은 노골적으로 드러내놓고 저항하는 경우와 드러나지 않게 교묘하게 감추어진 형태로 나타날 수 있다. 이러한 선행연구를 바탕으로 본 연구에서는 저항을 심리적, 행동적 저항의 2가지 요인으로 파악하고 조직변화에 대한 저항을 유발하는 원인들을 고용안정감, 변화에 관한 정보 및 경영자 신뢰 풍토로 구분하여 이들이 각각 심리적, 행동적 저항과 어떠한 관련성을 가지는지를 실증적으로 밝히고자 하였다. 그리고 저항에 따른 결과로써 구성원들의 심리적, 행동적 저항이 조직몰입과 어떠한 연관성을 갖는가를 검증하였다. 실증분석을 위해 조직변화를 추진하고 있는 국내 12개 기업을 대상으로 분석한 결과, 첫째 고용안정감은 구성원의 심리적 저항과 행동적 저항에 모두 부(-)적인 영향을 미치며, 둘째, 변화 과정에서 제공되는 변화 정보는 심리적 저항에 부정적 영향을 미치나, 행동적 저항에는 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 파악되었다. 셋째, 변화 과정에서 근로자 -경영자간 신뢰 풍토는 심리적, 행동적 저항과의 관계에 모두 유의한 관련성을 확인할 수 없었다. 마지막으로, 구성원의 심리적, 행동적 저항이 높을수록 조직몰입 모두 부정적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

        The study on employee resistance to organizational change literature noted that resistance should be classified into psychological resistance and behavioral resistance within the multi-dimensional approach. Based on the prior research, thi...

        The study on employee resistance to organizational change literature noted that resistance should be classified into psychological resistance and behavioral resistance within the multi-dimensional approach. Based on the prior research, this paper examines empirically context traits(job security, change-related information, and trust climate) as antecedents that affect on those resistances and to examine how both psychological and behavioral resistance impact on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior.<BR>  Previous research on resistance to organizational change suggested that resistance to change in organizations requires multi-dimensional approach because employees’ emotions and behaviors in response to change do not necessarily coincide. In other words, resistance to change can be made either openly or subtly. Based on the prior research, resistance should be classified into psychological resistance and behavioral resistance within the multi-dimensional approach, and this paper examines empirically context traits(job security, change-related information, and trust climate) as antecedents that affect those resistances and to examine how both psychological and behavioral resistance impact on organizational commitment as consequences.<BR>  Researchers and businessmen have attempted to define and reunify the concept of resistance to organizational change based on the assertion that organizational change efforts fail mainly because of employee resistance. However, they have not shown how employee resistance affects the success or failure of various change attempts (George & Jones, 2001; Piderit, 2000).<BR>  First, most previous research examined resistance to organizational change from a single- dimensional perspective. Some researchers focused on employees’ psychological state during the change process (Labianca, Gray, & Brass, 2000), while others defined resistance with emphasis on employees’ behavior (Brower & Abolafia, 1995). Most researchers investigated resistance to change in organizations from one of the two perspectives. From a theoretical view, however, employee reactions to change include cognitive, emotional and behavioral dimensions (Breckler, 1984; Piderit, 2000).<BR>  In short, resistance can be conceptualized as an emotional state or a behavior. As each state is an important component of employee response to change in organizations, defining resistance with emphasis on either of the two perspectives seems less than complete. In reality, understanding employee resistance to organizational change from the both perspectives will help understand employee response to change in depth.<BR>  Thus, this paper attempted to define each state of employee resistance to change in organizations based on the fact that employees’ psychological and behavioral reactions to organizational change can be different. For instance, during the change process, employees can have discontent or other psychological resistance, but the resistance can be explicitly expressed and lead to behavioral resistance. In addition, as psychology, behavior and cognition of organizational change do not necessarily coincide, resistance can usually accompany conflicting emotions. In this regard, this paper put an emphasis on multi-dimensions of resistance, examine the relations between each dimension and factors that cause employee resistance during the organizational change process and empirically identify how the outcomes of resistance affect organizational commitment.<BR>  For an empirical analysis, this paper administered surveys to 12 Korean companies which were implementing organizational change, and this paper obtained the following findings:<BR>  First, job security was found to have a significant negative relationship with an employee’s psychological and behavioral resistance. It was found that, among factors that af

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 〈초록〉
        Ⅰ. 문제제기 및 연구목적
        Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설 도출
        Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 변수측정
        Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
        Ⅴ. 토의 및 결론
        참고문헌
        ABSTRACT
      • 〈초록〉
        Ⅰ. 문제제기 및 연구목적
        Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설 도출
        Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 변수측정
        Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
        Ⅴ. 토의 및 결론
        참고문헌
        ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권중생, "조직혁신에 대한 구성원의 방어적 행동" 한국산업경영학회 15 (15): 177-206, 2000

      2 김진희, "제도 내재화와 조직 냉소주의가 조직몰입과혁신지향활동에 미치는 효과" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 825-853, 2007

      3 김진희, "제도 내재화와 조직 냉소주의가 조직몰입과 혁신지향 활동에 미치는 효과" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 825-853, 2007

      4 이군희, "사회과학연구방법론" 법문사 2005

      5 송석훈, "경영혁신에 관한 불만 및 직무소외와 조직유효성의 영향 관계" 한국산업경영학회 14 (14): 105-134, 1999

      6 지성구, "개인성향, 혁신저항, 그리고 혁신성과의 관계" 대한경영학회 18 (18): 2107-2132, 2005

      7 Goltz, S. M., "Using the operant and strategic contingencies models of power to understand resistance to change" 22 (22): 3-22, 2002

      8 Maurer,R., "Using resistance to build support for change" 19 : 56-64, 1996

      9 George, J. M., "Towards a process model of individual change in organization" 54 : 419-444, 2001

      10 Milliken,F.J., "Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment" 12 : 133-143, 1987

      1 권중생, "조직혁신에 대한 구성원의 방어적 행동" 한국산업경영학회 15 (15): 177-206, 2000

      2 김진희, "제도 내재화와 조직 냉소주의가 조직몰입과혁신지향활동에 미치는 효과" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 825-853, 2007

      3 김진희, "제도 내재화와 조직 냉소주의가 조직몰입과 혁신지향 활동에 미치는 효과" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 825-853, 2007

      4 이군희, "사회과학연구방법론" 법문사 2005

      5 송석훈, "경영혁신에 관한 불만 및 직무소외와 조직유효성의 영향 관계" 한국산업경영학회 14 (14): 105-134, 1999

      6 지성구, "개인성향, 혁신저항, 그리고 혁신성과의 관계" 대한경영학회 18 (18): 2107-2132, 2005

      7 Goltz, S. M., "Using the operant and strategic contingencies models of power to understand resistance to change" 22 (22): 3-22, 2002

      8 Maurer,R., "Using resistance to build support for change" 19 : 56-64, 1996

      9 George, J. M., "Towards a process model of individual change in organization" 54 : 419-444, 2001

      10 Milliken,F.J., "Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment" 12 : 133-143, 1987

      11 Brower,R.S., "The structural embeddedness of resistance among public managers" 20 : 149-166, 1995

      12 Ji, S-G, "The relationship between individual disposition & employee resistance and innovation performance" 18 (18): 2107-2132, 2005

      13 Eagly, A. H., "The psychology of attitudes" Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1998

      14 McMurry,R.N., "The problem of resistance to change in industry" 31 : 589-598, 1947

      15 Gomez, C., "The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment" 26 (26): 53-69, 2001

      16 Dyck, B., "The formation of breakaway organizations: Observations and a process model" 44 : 92-822, 1999

      17 Song, S-H, "The effects of employee resistance to management innovation & job neglect on organizational effectiveness" 14 (14): 105-134, 1999

      18 Dastmalchian, A., "The climate of workplace relations" Routledge 1991

      19 Munduate, L., "Supervisor power bases, cooperative behavior and organizational commitment" 7 (7): 163-177, 1998

      20 Prasad, P., "Stretching the iron cage: The constitution of implications of routine workplace resistance" 11 (11): 387-403, 2000

      21 Zaltman, G., "Strategies for planned change" Wiley 1977

      22 Lee.G.H, "Social science research methodology" Bubmoon Publishing Co. 2005

      23 Miller, K. I., "Social information and employee anxiety about organizational" 11 : 365-386, 1985

      24 Piderit, S. K., "Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence" 25 (25): 537-554, 2000

      25 Waddell, D., "Resistance: A constructive tool for change management" 36 (36): 543-548, 1998

      26 Bovey, W. H., "Resistance to organizational change: The role of defense mechanisms" 17 (17): 534-548, 2001

      27 Zander, A., "Resistance to change: Its analysis and prevention" 15 (15): 9-11, 1950

      28 Oreg, S., "Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure" 88 (88): 680-693, 2003

      29 Oldham, G. R., "Relations between situational factors and the comparative referents used by employees" 29 (29): 599-608, 1986

      30 Wanberg, C. R., "Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace" 88 (88): 132-142, 2000

      31 Deery, S. J., "Predicting organizational and union commitment: The effect of industrial relations climate" 32 (32): 581-597, 1994

      32 Chawla, A., "Predicting openness and commitment to change" 25 (25): 485-498, 2004

      33 Oreg, S., "Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change" 15 (15): 73-101, 2006

      34 Vince, R., "Paradox, defence and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change" 17 : 1-21, 1996

      35 Coah, L., "Overcoming resistance to change" 1 (1): 512-532, 1948

      36 Dawson,P., "Organizational change: A process approach" Paul Chapman Publishing 1994

      37 Van de Ven, A. H., "Measuring and assessing organizations" Wiley 1980

      38 Callahan, J. L., "Masking the need for cultural change: The effects of emotion structuration" 23 (23): 281-297, 2002

      39 Tichy,N.M., "Managing strategic change: Technical, political and cultural dynamics" Wiley 1983

      40 Judge, T. A., "Managerial coping with organizational change" 84 (84): 101-122, 1999

      41 Kotter,J.P, "Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail" 4 : 59-67, 1995

      42 Cropanzano, R., "Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (2nd ed.)" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2001

      43 Greenhalgh, L., "Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity" 9 (9): 438-448, 1984

      44 Robbins, T. L., "Intra-and inter-justice relationships: Assessing the direction" 53 (53): 1329-1355, 2000

      45 Ashford,S.J., "Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions" 24 : 19-36, 1988

      46 Rusbult, C. E., "Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction" 31 : 599-627, 1988

      47 Taylor, S. E., "Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health" 103 (103): 193-210, 1988

      48 Burke, R. J., "Hospital restructuring and nursing staff well-being: The role of perceived hospital and union support" 14 (14): 93-115, 2001

      49 Meyer, J. P., "Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. 2002. Affective, continuance and normative commitment to organization: A meta analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences" 61 (61): 20-52, 2002

      50 Drummond,H., "Go and say,we are shutting:Ju Jitsu as a metaphor for analyzing resistance.Human Relations,51:741-759" 51 : 741-759, 1998

      51 Becker, T. E., "Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making" 35 (35): 232-244, 1992

      52 Watson, D., "Extroversions and its positive emotional core" 4 : 767-793, 1997

      53 Saunders, D. M., "Employee voice to supervisors" 3 : 241-259, 1992

      54 Greenberg, J., "Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts" 75 (75): 561-568, 1990

      55 Crino, M. D., "Employee sabotage: A random or preventable phenomenon" 6 (6): 311-330, 1994

      56 Gardner, D. G., "Employee focus of attention and reactions to organizational change" 23 (23): 351-370, 1987

      57 Kwon, J., "Employee defensive behavior on organizational innovation" 15 (15): 177-206, 2000

      58 Breckler,S.J., "Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude" 47 : 1191-1205, 1984

      59 Jaros, S. J., "Effects of continuance, affective and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models" 36 (36): 951-995, 1993

      60 Armenakis, A. A., "Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness" 15 (15): 169-183, 2002

      61 Schweiger, D. M., "Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment" 34 (34): 110-135, 1991

      62 Kotter, J. P., "Choosing strategies for change" 57 : 106-114, 1979

      63 Trade-Leigh, K. E., "Case study: Identifying resistance in managing change" 15 (15): 138-155, 2002

      64 Fishbein M., "Belief, attitude, intention and behavior : An introduction to theory and research" Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 1975

      65 Miller, V. D., "Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change" 22 : 59-80, 1994

      66 Greenberg, J., "Advances in organizational justice" Stanford University Press 2001

      67 Allen, N. J., "A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment" 1 (1): 61-89, 1991

      68 Labianca, G., "A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment" 11 : 235-257, 2000

      69 Rosenblatt, Z., "A gender-based framework of the experience of job insecurity and its effects on work attitudes" 8 (8): 197-217, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
      2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼