Whole-body CT in Polytrauma Patients: The Effect of Arm Position on Abdominal Image Quality When Using a Human Phantom

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

For a considerable number of emergency computed tomography (CT) scans, patients are unable to position their arms above their head due to traumatic injuries. The arms-down position has been shown to reduce image quality with beam-hardening artifacts in the dorsal regions of the liver, spleen, and kidneys, rendering these images non-diagnostic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of arm position on the image quality in patients undergoing whole-body CT. We acquired CT scans with various acquisition parameters at voltages of 80, 120, and 140 kVp and an increasing tube current from 200 to 400 mAs in 50 mAs increments. The image noise and the contrast assessment were considered for quantitative analyses of the CT images. The image noise (IN), the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the coefficient of variation (COV) were evaluated. Quantitative analyses of the experiments were performed with CT scans representative of five different arm positions. Results of the CT scans acquired at 120 kVp and 250 mAs showed high image quality in patients with both arms raised above the head (SNR: 12.4, CNR: 10.9, and COV: 8.1) and both arms flexed at the elbows on the chest (SNR: 11.5, CNR: 10.2, and COV: 8.8) while the image quality significantly decreased with both arms in the down position (SNR: 9.1, CNR: 7.6, and COV: 11). Both arms raised, one arm raised, and both arms flexed improved the image quality compared to arms in the down position by reducing beam-hardening and streak artifacts caused by the arms being at the side of body. This study provides optimal methods for achieving higher image quality and lower noise in abdominal CT for trauma patients.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 T. Ptak, 8 : 250-, 2001

2 L. M. Benneker, 13 : 349-, 2007

3 C. Karlo, 18 : 285-, 2011

4 H. Hoppe, 13 : 123-, 2006

5 M. Brink, 249 : 661-, 2008

6 E. Fanucci, 13 : 251-, 2007

7 J. E. Ngaile, 148 : 189-, 2012

8 J. Bayer, 70 : 900-, 2011

9 T. Denis, 249 : 413-, 2008

10 M. K. Kalra, 11 : 267-, 2005

11 C. Tanaka, 27 : 40-, 2006

12 M. J. Siegel, 233 : 515-, 2004

13 T. Ptak, 229 : 902-, 2003

14 U. Linsenmaier, 12 : 1728-, 2002

15 D. Nguyen, 192 : 3-, 2009