행정문화변동연구의 방법론적 고찰 = The methodological study for changing administrative culture

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The process of the transformation of administrative culture can be explained by the view of functionalist and structuralist. For conventional structuralist, the formation of administrative culture is decided by social structure. As functionalists have argued, the function of human agency is critical for changing the administrative culture. For instance, mass media, bureaucrat behaviour, ideological functions of government, parties and group have led to the process of the political socialization for changing administrative culture. The structural explanation and analysis is based on Marxist ideas, while the functional analysis may be understood through Weberian ideas. However, conventional dichotomy between structuralist and functionalist will be problematic. The changed process of the administrative culture can be understood as the complementary approach of structure and agency. Gidden's theory, in contrast to the exclusive ideas of Marx and Weber, avoids the dualism of structure and agency. The adoption of the structuration theory as the interaction's methodology between structure and agent will be necessary to analyze the transformation of Korean administrative culture.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

행정문화의 변동과정은 기능주의자와 구조주의자들에 의해 설명되어 질수 있는데 구조와 기능을 구분하는 이분법적인 견해를 통해 행정문화의 변화를 분석하는 것은 방법론상의 오류로 간주될 수 있다. 행정문화의 변화과정은 구조의 역할과 행위자들의 기능의 서로 상반되는 접근법보다는 상호 보완적인 접근 방식으로 고찰될 수 있다. 구조화 이론은 구조와 행위자의 상호적인 작용으로서 행정문화변동의 관찰을 위한 새로운 이론화의 방향의 모색이다. 맑스(Marx)와 베버(Weber)의 방법론의 이분법적인 논의에 반대하는 기든스(Giddens)의 구조화(structuration) 이론은 구조와 기능을 구분하는 이분법적인 개념에 이의를 제기한다. 행정문화의 변동과정은 기능적인 베버의 개념과 구조적인 맑스의 이론을 포함하는 기든스의 구조화 이론의 방법론에 의해 조명해 보고자 한다. 행정문화변동의 방법론에서 기능과 구조의 역할에 대한 이분법적인 개념보다는 상호보완적인 접근은 행정문화의 변화를 분석하는데 유용할 것이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국의 행정문화" 고려대학교 출판부 1982

2 Antonio, "the Meta-Theoretic Foundations of the Weber-Marx Dialogue edited by Antonio University Press of Kansas" 20-40, 1985

3 Oakes, "the Case of Max Weber" 589-615, 1982

4 "Weber on and against Marx edited by Antonio University Press of Kansas" 167-188, 1985

5 "Theory and Method in Comparative Research" 731-749, 1983

6 Frederickson, "The University of Alabama Press" 1980

7 "The Structuralist Critique of Weber's Sociology" 1-15, 1977

8 "The Sociology of Social Change State University of New York Press" 1993

9 Kocka, "The Social Science between Dogmatism and Decisionism A Comparison of Karl Marx and Max Weber edited by Antonio University Press of Kansas" 134-166, 1985

10 Brook, "The Shaping of Capitalism in Eastern Asia University of Michigan Press" 1997

11 "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism translated by Parsons" 1930

12 "The Prospects of Public Organization" 101-113, 1977

13 Peters, "The Politics of Bureaucracy" 1995

14 Giddens,Anthony, "The Constitution of Society" University of California Press 1986

15 Hood, "The Art of the State" 1998

16 Jun,Jong S, "Public Administration:Design and Problem Solving" Macmillan 1986

17 Beer, "Patterns of Government The Major Political Systems of Europe edited by S" Random House 1958

18 "Methodology of the Social Science" Free Press 1949

19 "Methodology of the Social Science" Free Press 1949

20 "Essays on the Sociology off Fate" 1981

21 "Essays in Sociology translated and edited by Gerth" Oxford University Press 1948

22 Cambridge, "Encounters With Classical and Contemporary Social Thought" Polity Press 1995

23 Eckstein, "Culturalist Theory of Political Change" 789-804, 1988

24 Berkeley, "Central Problems in Social Theory Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis University of California Press" 1994

25 "Bureaucracy in a Democratic Society" Syracuse University Press 1965

26 Barzelay,Michael, "Breaking Through Bureaucracy:A New Vision for Managing in Government" University of California Press 1992

27 "Asian Power and Politics:The Cultural Dimensions of Authority" Havard University Press 1985

28 Harmon,Michael M, "Action Theory for Public Administration" Longman 1981