RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      대한제국기의 국가 상징 제정과 경운궁

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      During the Daehan Empire when Gyeongungung Palace was the center of the national politics, many national symbols were invented and institutionalized. The national symbols of the time did not just remain within the world view of the Chinese civilization/barbarism which took China as the center of the world but they were gradually changed relevant to the world view of International Law based on the interactions among many nations. At that time, many devices representing the changed status of the ruler of Joseon from the king to the emperor were developed and institutionalized. The most prominent example is the construction of Wongudan( 丘壇) where the sacrifice for heaven and the coronation ceremony of the Korean emperor were performed. What is more, in order to represent the newly changed status of Gyeongungung as a main residence for the emperor, new buildings such as Junghwhajeon Hall were constructed and the symbol of sovereignty was also changed from phoenix to twin dragons. While in Geunjeongjeon Hall of Gyeongbokgung Palace, the main residence of Joseon dynasty, a pattern of phoenix had been inscribed as a symbol for sovereignty, however, twin dragons came to be sculptured on the King’s path of the stone steps outside Junghwhajeon and on the ceiling inside the building, which are the symbol only allowed for the emperor. The representation of royal seals(御寶) also changed from the shape of a turtle to that of a dragon, which changes were nevertheless bound to the world view of Chinese civilization/barbarism. At the same time, Joseon began to make diplomatic ties with other countries such as US, UK and Germany and started to feel the need to make national symbols relevant to the relations based on International Law. Therefore, national symbols such as a national flag were invented. The national flag was firstly made in 1883, which was later on used for the visits of diplomatic missions, diplomatic documents and passports representing the Daehan Empire both within Korean peninsula and oversea. The national flag was more frequently employed from the late 1890’s for the march of the Emperor Gojong and Court Banquet within the palace replacing the flag of dragons, the former symbol of sovereignty. Moreover, the national flags were hung all around the city in the festive days such as the Emperor’s Birthday. This frequent use of the national flag as representation of the nation would lead to the formation of a new idea on the nation and the state. The juxtaposition of the traditional and the Western in the institutionalization of national symbols for sovereignty was a strategy of the Daehan Empire to deal with the changes within and outside Korean peninsula.
      번역하기

      During the Daehan Empire when Gyeongungung Palace was the center of the national politics, many national symbols were invented and institutionalized. The national symbols of the time did not just remain within the world view of the Chinese civilizatio...

      During the Daehan Empire when Gyeongungung Palace was the center of the national politics, many national symbols were invented and institutionalized. The national symbols of the time did not just remain within the world view of the Chinese civilization/barbarism which took China as the center of the world but they were gradually changed relevant to the world view of International Law based on the interactions among many nations. At that time, many devices representing the changed status of the ruler of Joseon from the king to the emperor were developed and institutionalized. The most prominent example is the construction of Wongudan( 丘壇) where the sacrifice for heaven and the coronation ceremony of the Korean emperor were performed. What is more, in order to represent the newly changed status of Gyeongungung as a main residence for the emperor, new buildings such as Junghwhajeon Hall were constructed and the symbol of sovereignty was also changed from phoenix to twin dragons. While in Geunjeongjeon Hall of Gyeongbokgung Palace, the main residence of Joseon dynasty, a pattern of phoenix had been inscribed as a symbol for sovereignty, however, twin dragons came to be sculptured on the King’s path of the stone steps outside Junghwhajeon and on the ceiling inside the building, which are the symbol only allowed for the emperor. The representation of royal seals(御寶) also changed from the shape of a turtle to that of a dragon, which changes were nevertheless bound to the world view of Chinese civilization/barbarism. At the same time, Joseon began to make diplomatic ties with other countries such as US, UK and Germany and started to feel the need to make national symbols relevant to the relations based on International Law. Therefore, national symbols such as a national flag were invented. The national flag was firstly made in 1883, which was later on used for the visits of diplomatic missions, diplomatic documents and passports representing the Daehan Empire both within Korean peninsula and oversea. The national flag was more frequently employed from the late 1890’s for the march of the Emperor Gojong and Court Banquet within the palace replacing the flag of dragons, the former symbol of sovereignty. Moreover, the national flags were hung all around the city in the festive days such as the Emperor’s Birthday. This frequent use of the national flag as representation of the nation would lead to the formation of a new idea on the nation and the state. The juxtaposition of the traditional and the Western in the institutionalization of national symbols for sovereignty was a strategy of the Daehan Empire to deal with the changes within and outside Korean peninsula.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 머리말
      • II. 국가상징의 제정과 체계 정립
      • 1. 개항과 국기의 제정
      • 2. 국가 상징 체계의 정립
      • III. 대한제국기의 국기 사용
      • I. 머리말
      • II. 국가상징의 제정과 체계 정립
      • 1. 개항과 국기의 제정
      • 2. 국가 상징 체계의 정립
      • III. 대한제국기의 국기 사용
      • 1. 황제의 거둥 및 황실의 진연에 나타나는 태극기
      • 2. 기념일의 제정과 국기 게양의 확산
      • IV. 경운궁의 전각과 대한제국기 기념물의 상징 표현
      • 1. 경운궁 전각에 표현된 통치권의 상징
      • 2. 기념물에 표현된 황실 문장
      • V. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 국사편찬위원회, "프랑스외무부문서2 -조선Ⅰ·1888" 2003

      2 劉敦楨저, "중국고대건축사" 도서출판 세진사 1995

      3 서인화, "조선시대진연진찬진하병풍" 국립국악원 2000

      4 명세나, "조선시대오봉병(五峰屛) 연구" 이화여대 2007

      5 한철호, "우리나라 최초의 국기(‘박영효 태극기’ 1882)와 통리교섭통상사무아문 제작 국기(1884)의 원형 발견과 그 역사적 의의" 한국독립운동사연구소 (31) : 125-187, 2008

      6 서울특별시사편찬위원회, "서울의문화재" 서울특별시 2003

      7 "독립신문"

      8 이순우, "덕수궁 돈덕전(惇德殿)의 건립내력에 관한 조사자료"

      9 이강칠, "대한제국시대훈장제도" 백산자료원 1999

      10 박현정, "대한제국기 오얏꽃문양 연구" 서울대학교 2002

      1 국사편찬위원회, "프랑스외무부문서2 -조선Ⅰ·1888" 2003

      2 劉敦楨저, "중국고대건축사" 도서출판 세진사 1995

      3 서인화, "조선시대진연진찬진하병풍" 국립국악원 2000

      4 명세나, "조선시대오봉병(五峰屛) 연구" 이화여대 2007

      5 한철호, "우리나라 최초의 국기(‘박영효 태극기’ 1882)와 통리교섭통상사무아문 제작 국기(1884)의 원형 발견과 그 역사적 의의" 한국독립운동사연구소 (31) : 125-187, 2008

      6 서울특별시사편찬위원회, "서울의문화재" 서울특별시 2003

      7 "독립신문"

      8 이순우, "덕수궁 돈덕전(惇德殿)의 건립내력에 관한 조사자료"

      9 이강칠, "대한제국시대훈장제도" 백산자료원 1999

      10 박현정, "대한제국기 오얏꽃문양 연구" 서울대학교 2002

      11 이윤상, "대한제국기 국가와 국왕의 위상제고사업" 진단학회 (95) : 81-112, 2003

      12 목수현, "근대국가의 ‘국기(國旗)’라는 시각문화 - 개항과 대한제국기 태극기를 중심으로" 미술사학연구회 (27) : 309-344, 2006

      13 李潤相, "고종 즉위 40년 및 망육순 기념행사와 기념물" 29 (29): 2003

      14 王大有, "龍鳳文化原流" 동문선 1994

      15 楊新, "龍的藝術" 常務印書館香港分館·故宮博物院紫禁城出版社 1988

      16 "高宗純宗實錄"

      17 문화재청, "集玉齋修理調査報告書" 2005

      18 "皇城新聞"

      19 "每日申報"

      20 "東萊監理各面署報告書(奎18147)"

      21 김지영, "朝鮮後期국왕 行次에 대한 연구 : 儀軌班次圖와 擧動記錄을 중심으로" 서울大學校 2005

      22 "明成皇后國葬都監儀軌"

      23 문화재관리국, "昌德宮仁政殿實測調査報告書" 1998

      24 "慶運宮重建都監儀軌"

      25 정유나, "慶運宮(현덕수궁) 諸殿閣의 내외부 채색에 관한 연구" (7) : 1996

      26 서울특별시·한국건축문화연구소, "慶熙宮崇政殿發掘調査報告書" 1990

      27 小田省吾, "德壽宮史" 李王職 1938

      28 강성원, "德壽宮 石造殿의 원형 추정과 기술사적 의의" 대한건축학회 24 (24): 141-148, 2008

      29 "官報"

      30 "學部來去文(奎17798)"

      31 "奏本"

      32 목수현, "大韓帝國期 國家 視覺 象徵의 淵源과 變遷" 한국미술연구소 (27) : 289-321, 2008

      33 "外衙門草記(奎19487)"

      34 "右侍御廳節目(奎9846)"

      35 문화재청, "勤政殿修理工事및實測調査報告書" 2003

      36 史仲文主編, "中國藝術史" 河北人民出版社 2006

      37 樓廣西, "中國傳統建築文化" 中國旅游出版社 2008

      38 "中和殿營建都監儀軌"

      39 문화재청, "中和殿實測·修理調査報告書" 2001

      40 이성미, "The screen of the Five peaks of the Chosun Dynasty. in: 조선왕실의 미술문화" 대원사 2005

      41 프랑스국립극동연구원, "Souvnir de Seoul, 서울의추억한불1886-1905" 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서울학연구 -> 서울학연구 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL () KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.63 0.63 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.61 0.62 1.483 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼