RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Innovation and Competition = The True Innovativeness of Innovation and Distance to Frontier

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100230146

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the literature on innovation and competition, consideration of the ‘innovativeness’ of innovation has been neglected. This paper investigates the relationship between innovation and competition conditional on the innovativeness of innovation and the distance to frontier. We measure the innovativeness of innovation by analyzing whether it is a new-to-the-market innovation or a new-to-the-firm innovation. Further, we develop a new measure of firms’ technological level using firms’ main objective of innovation. Using a dataset from surveys of Korean manufacturing firms from 2002 to 2004, this paper finds that the relationship between competition and innovation is conditional on both the quality of innovation and distance to frontier. The results are: (1) frontiers are more likely to innovate than technological laggard firms, (2) competition has an inverted-U shape relation with new to the market innovation, while there is no such relation with new to the firm only innovation, (3) the inverted-U shape relation between competition and innovation is driven by frontiers, not followers or laggards, and (4) new to the market innovation and R&D expenditure show a similar pattern of an inverted-U shape relation with competition, while new to the firm only innovation and patents exhibit a similar pattern of no relation with competition.
    번역하기

    In the literature on innovation and competition, consideration of the ‘innovativeness’ of innovation has been neglected. This paper investigates the relationship between innovation and competition conditional on the innovativeness of innovation an...

    In the literature on innovation and competition, consideration of the ‘innovativeness’ of innovation has been neglected. This paper investigates the relationship between innovation and competition conditional on the innovativeness of innovation and the distance to frontier. We measure the innovativeness of innovation by analyzing whether it is a new-to-the-market innovation or a new-to-the-firm innovation. Further, we develop a new measure of firms’ technological level using firms’ main objective of innovation. Using a dataset from surveys of Korean manufacturing firms from 2002 to 2004, this paper finds that the relationship between competition and innovation is conditional on both the quality of innovation and distance to frontier. The results are: (1) frontiers are more likely to innovate than technological laggard firms, (2) competition has an inverted-U shape relation with new to the market innovation, while there is no such relation with new to the firm only innovation, (3) the inverted-U shape relation between competition and innovation is driven by frontiers, not followers or laggards, and (4) new to the market innovation and R&D expenditure show a similar pattern of an inverted-U shape relation with competition, while new to the firm only innovation and patents exhibit a similar pattern of no relation with competition.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. DATA
    • 3. MODEL
    • 4. RESULTS
    • 5. CONCLUSION
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. DATA
    • 3. MODEL
    • 4. RESULTS
    • 5. CONCLUSION
    • REFERENCES
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Lipsey, R., "What Does Total Factor Productivity Measure?" International Productivity Monitor 1 : 31 ~ 40, 2000

    2 Dasgupta, P., "Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D" Bell Journal of Economics 11 (1) : 1 ~ 28, 1980

    3 Arrow, K, "The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity" Princeton University Press, 1962

    4 Kleinknecht, A, "The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators" Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11 (2) : 109 ~ 121, 2002

    5 Mairesse, J., "The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data" 2004

    6 Porter, M, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" Macmillan, 1990

    7 Crepon, B., "Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level" Papiers d’Economie Mathématique et Applications 15, 1998

    8 Brouwer, E., "Measuring the Unmeasurable: A Country’s Non-R&D Expenditure on Product and Service Innovation" Research Policy 25 (8) : 1235 ~ 1242, 1997

    9 Scherer, F, "Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance" Houghton Mifflin, 1980

    10 Cohen, W., "Handbook of Industrial Organization" Elsevier Science Publishers, 1989

    1 Lipsey, R., "What Does Total Factor Productivity Measure?" International Productivity Monitor 1 : 31 ~ 40, 2000

    2 Dasgupta, P., "Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D" Bell Journal of Economics 11 (1) : 1 ~ 28, 1980

    3 Arrow, K, "The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity" Princeton University Press, 1962

    4 Kleinknecht, A, "The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators" Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11 (2) : 109 ~ 121, 2002

    5 Mairesse, J., "The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data" 2004

    6 Porter, M, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" Macmillan, 1990

    7 Crepon, B., "Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level" Papiers d’Economie Mathématique et Applications 15, 1998

    8 Brouwer, E., "Measuring the Unmeasurable: A Country’s Non-R&D Expenditure on Product and Service Innovation" Research Policy 25 (8) : 1235 ~ 1242, 1997

    9 Scherer, F, "Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance" Houghton Mifflin, 1980

    10 Cohen, W., "Handbook of Industrial Organization" Elsevier Science Publishers, 1989

    11 Cohen, W., "Handbook of Economics of Innovation" North Holland Elsevier : 129 ~ 213, 2010

    12 Acemoglu, D., "Distance to Frontier, Selection and Economic Growth" Journal of the European Economic Association 4 (1) : 37 ~ 74, 2006

    13 Coad, A., "Distance to Frontier and Appropriate Business Strategy" LEM Papers Series 13, 2008

    14 한진희, "Direction of Causality in Innovation-Exporting Linkage: Evidence from Microdata on Korean Manufacturing" Korea and the World Economy 12 (2) : 367 ~ 398, 2011

    15 Amable, B, "Competition, Innovation and Distance to Frontier" 2008

    16 Alder, S., "Competition and Innovation: Does the Distance to the Technology Frontier Matter?" 2010

    17 Aghion, P., "Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship" The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2) : 701 ~ 728, 2005

    18 Gilbert, R., "Competition and Innovation" Journal of Industrial Organization Education 1 (1) : 1 ~ 23, 2006

    19 Levin, R, "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development" Brookings Papers of Economic Activity 18 (3) : 783 ~ 831, 1987

    20 Szymanski, D, "An Analysis of the Market Share-Profitability Relationship" The Journal of Marketing 57 (4) : 1 ~ 18, 1993

    21 Aghion, P., "A Primer on Innovation and Growth" Bruegel Policy Brief 2006 (6), 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼