Early and Midterm Outcome of Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: On-Pump versus Off-Pump Bypass

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still associated with increased morbidity and mortality as compared to the first-time operation. Further, the application of the off-pump technique to redo CABG is limited due to technical difficulties. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze early and midterm results after redo CABG and compare the outcome of redo on-pump and off-pump CABG. Methods: From June 1996 to October 2011, elective redo CABG was performed in 32 patients. Mean age was 64.8 years (on pump 64.3 years vs. off pump 65.5 years; p=0.658), and 21 patients were male. Among these patients, 14 (43.8%) underwent on-pump CABG, and 18 (56.2%) underwent off-pump CABG. Results: Internal thoracic artery was used in 22 patients (68.8%), and total arterial revascularization was achieved in 17 patients (53.1%). The average number of distal anastomoses was 2.13, and the rate of incomplete revascularization was 43.8%. The rate of total arterial revascularization was higher in the off-pump group (14.3% vs. 83.3%, p＜0.001), and the use of saphenous vein graft was more in the on-pump group (78.6% vs. 16.7%, p＜0.001). Overall hospital mortality was 3.1% (n=1) and was comparable in both groups (on pump 7.1% vs. off pump 0%; p=0.249). Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (64.2%), and the rate of complications was high in the on-pump group without statistical significance (64.2% vs. 33.3%, p=0.082). The mean follow-up duration was 5.4 years, and overall survival at 10 years was 86.0%±10.5%. There was no significant difference in the 10-year survival rate between the two groups (79.6% vs.
100%, p=0.225). Conclusion: Redo CABG can be safely performed with acceptable mortality. Redo off-pump coronary artery bypass is feasible with low mortality and morbidity, comparable target vessel bypass grafting, and long-term survival. The off-pump technique might be considered a safe option for redo CABG in high-risk patients.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Vander Salm TJ, "What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization?: answers from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)" 39 : 565-572, 2002

2 BARI Investigators, "The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial" 49 : 1600-1606, 2007

3 Yau TM, "The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations" 120 : 156-163, 2000

4 Mishra YK, "Ten-year experience with single-vessel and multivessel reoperative off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting" 135 : 527-532, 2008

5 Teodori G, "Reoperative coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass" 15 : 303-308, 2000

6 Di Mauro M, "Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes" 79 : 81-87, 2005

7 Masroor S, "Redo-OPCAB via left thoracotomy using symmetry aortic connector system: a report of two cases" 19 : 51-53, 2004

8 Schutz A, "Re-OPCAB vs. Re CABG for myocardial revascularization" 49 : 144-148, 2001

9 Vohra HA, "Propensity score analysis of early and late outcome after redo off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting" 33 : 209-214, 2008

10 Mack MJ, "Off-pump surgery and alternatives to standard operation in redo coronary surgery" 19 : 313-319, 2004

11 Trehan N, "Off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting" 70 : 1026-1029, 2000

12 Cosgrove DM, "Is coronary reoperation without the pump an advantage?" 55 : 329-, 1993

13 Czerny M, "Coronary reoperations:recurrence of angina and clinical outcome with and without cardiopulmonary bypass" 75 : 847-852, 2003

14 Tugtekin SM, "Coronary reoperation with and without cardiopulmonary bypass" 95 : 93-98, 2006

15 Valgimigli M, "Complete myocardial revascularization: between myth and reality" 26 : 1809-1810, 2005

16 Sisillo E, "Comparison of on pump and off pump coronary surgery: risk factors for neurological outcome" 31 : 1076-1080, 2007

17 Stamou SC, "Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass" 69 : 1383-1387, 2000