RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고객만족경영 지속성의 핵심 운영요인과 성과에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101905064

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Successful achievement of Customer Satisfaction Management (CSM) requires development of the operating systems to sustain maintenance and activate through analyzing key success operating factors. This study examines a sustainable CSM which draws key operating factors from MB (Malcolm Baldrige) model and investigates their affects on firms` internal and external performance. Consequently, the findings are as follows: First, Customer Satisfaction Management operating system affects on sustainability of CSM, process performance and customer performance. CS leadership, customer oriented HRM (Human Resource Management), CSM evaluation system and team-work are required to achieve successful Customer Satisfaction Management. Second, sustainability of CSM affects on customer performance via process performance, sustainability index consists of two factors, CSM driving activity and CSM activity level. CSM driving activity contains mid-managers commitment, CSM team`s activity, process improvement activities, and CSM consistency. CSM activity level, formative index, contains firm`s reinforcement level of customer satisfaction, subcontractor`s education level, real time feedback of VOC (Voice of Customer). Third, process performance affects on customer performance. Process performance which contains customer`s waiting time reduction, short business time, brief decision making process, cost reduction through process improvement, process reengineering for customer needs and service environment improvement provides better service than competitors to customer. Finally, four factors of CSM operating system (CS leadership, customer oriented HRM, CSM evaluation system and team-work) also affect on customer performance.
      번역하기

      Successful achievement of Customer Satisfaction Management (CSM) requires development of the operating systems to sustain maintenance and activate through analyzing key success operating factors. This study examines a sustainable CSM which draws key o...

      Successful achievement of Customer Satisfaction Management (CSM) requires development of the operating systems to sustain maintenance and activate through analyzing key success operating factors. This study examines a sustainable CSM which draws key operating factors from MB (Malcolm Baldrige) model and investigates their affects on firms` internal and external performance. Consequently, the findings are as follows: First, Customer Satisfaction Management operating system affects on sustainability of CSM, process performance and customer performance. CS leadership, customer oriented HRM (Human Resource Management), CSM evaluation system and team-work are required to achieve successful Customer Satisfaction Management. Second, sustainability of CSM affects on customer performance via process performance, sustainability index consists of two factors, CSM driving activity and CSM activity level. CSM driving activity contains mid-managers commitment, CSM team`s activity, process improvement activities, and CSM consistency. CSM activity level, formative index, contains firm`s reinforcement level of customer satisfaction, subcontractor`s education level, real time feedback of VOC (Voice of Customer). Third, process performance affects on customer performance. Process performance which contains customer`s waiting time reduction, short business time, brief decision making process, cost reduction through process improvement, process reengineering for customer needs and service environment improvement provides better service than competitors to customer. Finally, four factors of CSM operating system (CS leadership, customer oriented HRM, CSM evaluation system and team-work) also affect on customer performance.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 라선아, "한국기업의 서비스 품질 평가제도 변천과정" 서울대학교출판부 2006

      2 김창호, "팀 조직의 활동이 지식경영 활동 및 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적인 분석" 한국지식경영학회 6 (6): 91-107, 2005

      3 유시정, "서비스기업의 조직내 리더십과 팔로워십이 임파워먼트, 직무태도 및 서비스품질에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국서비스경영학회 9 (9): 103-129, 2008

      4 서창적, "상생 파트너십을 통한 Customer Service 향상 - 현대백화점의 CS 업무혁신 Festival을 중심으로 -" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 1-30, 2010

      5 안영진, "삼성전자서비스-서비스 혁신 리더" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 115-133, 2010

      6 안영진, "말콤볼드리지 성공 법칙" 김영사 2005

      7 신완선, "말콤볼드리지 MB 모델 워크북" 고즈윈 2009

      8 김용하, "금호고속의 고객행복경영" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 95-114, 2010

      9 유한주, "국가품질상 경영시스템" 한국표준협회 2008

      10 김계수, "고객지향적인 서비스운영활동이 고객만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국품질경영학회 29 (29): 76-92, 2001

      1 라선아, "한국기업의 서비스 품질 평가제도 변천과정" 서울대학교출판부 2006

      2 김창호, "팀 조직의 활동이 지식경영 활동 및 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적인 분석" 한국지식경영학회 6 (6): 91-107, 2005

      3 유시정, "서비스기업의 조직내 리더십과 팔로워십이 임파워먼트, 직무태도 및 서비스품질에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국서비스경영학회 9 (9): 103-129, 2008

      4 서창적, "상생 파트너십을 통한 Customer Service 향상 - 현대백화점의 CS 업무혁신 Festival을 중심으로 -" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 1-30, 2010

      5 안영진, "삼성전자서비스-서비스 혁신 리더" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 115-133, 2010

      6 안영진, "말콤볼드리지 성공 법칙" 김영사 2005

      7 신완선, "말콤볼드리지 MB 모델 워크북" 고즈윈 2009

      8 김용하, "금호고속의 고객행복경영" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 95-114, 2010

      9 유한주, "국가품질상 경영시스템" 한국표준협회 2008

      10 김계수, "고객지향적인 서비스운영활동이 고객만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국품질경영학회 29 (29): 76-92, 2001

      11 조광행, "고객만족경영 왜 실패할까?" 들녘미디어 2000

      12 김준호, "고객만족경영" 무역경영사 2008

      13 김희탁, "고객 서비스의 전략적 활용: 서울삼성병원의 사례" 한국서비스경영학회 11 (11): 57-72, 2010

      14 Curkovic, S., "Validating the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Framework through Structural Equation Modeling" 38 (38): 765-791, 2000

      15 Wetzels, M., "Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration" 33 (33): 177-195, 2009

      16 Ojha, A. K., "Total Quality Management: How Can We Make the Implementation Effective?" 25 (25): 19-29, 2000

      17 Reed, R., "Total Quality Management and Sustainable Competitive Advantage" 5 (5): 5-26, 2000

      18 Ugboro, I. O., "Top Management Leadership, Employee Empowerment, Job Satisfaction, and Customer Satisfaction in TQM Organizations : An Empirical Study" 5 : 247-272, 2000

      19 Choi, T. Y, "The TQM Paradox: Relations among TQM Practices, Plant Performance, and Customer Satisfaction" 17 (17): 59-75, 1998

      20 Ahire, S. L., "The Impact of Design Management and Process Management on Quality: An Empirical Investigation" 18 : 549-575, 2000

      21 Nilsson, L., "The Impact if Quality Practices on Customer Satisfaction and Business Results : Product versus Service Organizations" 6 (6): 5-27, 2001

      22 Lin, W. B., "The Exploration of Customer Satisfaction Model From a Comprehensive Perspective" 33 : 110-121, 2007

      23 Johnson M. D., "The Evolution and Future of National Customer Satisfaction Index Models" 22 : 217-245, 2001

      24 Badri, M. A., "The Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence Framework. Empirical Test and Validation" 23 (23): 1118-1157, 2006

      25 정승환, "TQM활동이 업무수행 지원에 대한 종업원 만족도 및 경영성과에 미치는 영향- 의료산업을 중심으로 -" 한국서비스경영학회 6 (6): 57-85, 2005

      26 Maria Leticia S. V., "TQM and Firms Performance : An EFQM Excellence Model Research Based Survey" 2 (2): 21-41, 2007

      27 Petter, S., "Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research" 31 (31): 623-656, 2007

      28 Hansmann, K. W, "SmartPLS Manual"

      29 Metters, R., "Service Management-Academic Issues and Scholarly Reflections from Operations Management Researchers" 38 (38): 195-213, 2007

      30 Hsu, S. H., "Robustness Testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for Measuring Customer Satisfaction" 17 (17): 355-371, 2006

      31 Jha, V. S., "Relevance of Total Quality Management or Business Excellence Strategy Implementation for Enterprise Resource Planning - A Conceptual Study" 347-576, 2007

      32 Heizer, J., "Operations Management, 9th ed" Prentice Hall 2008

      33 Hair, Jr., J. F, "Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed" Pearson Education, Inc 2010

      34 Dean Jr., J. W., "Management Theory and Total Quality : Improving Research and Practice through Theory Development" 19 (19): 392-418, 1994

      35 정규석, "MBNQA상에 내포된 지속적 개선, 혁신과 학습 개념" 한국품질경영학회 35 (35): 73-80, 2007

      36 Jeffers, P. I., "Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction between IT and Non-IT Resources" 39 (39): 703-734, 2008

      37 Madanmohan, T. R., "Incremental Technical Innovation and Their Determinants" 9 (9): 481-510, 2005

      38 Flynn, B. B., "Further Evidence on the Validity of the Theoretical Models Underlying the Baldrige Criteria" 19 : 617-652, 2001

      39 Diamantopoulos, A, "Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development : A Comparison and Empirical Illustration" 17 : 263-282, 2006

      40 Sila, I, "Examining the Effects of Contextual Factors on TQM and Performance through the Lens of Organizational Theories: An Empirical Study" 25 (25): 83-109, 2007

      41 Hendricks, K. B., "Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms that Have Won Quality Awards" 43 (43): 1258-1274, 1997

      42 Lillrank, P, "Continuous Improvement: Exploring Alternative Organizational Designs" 12 (12): 41-55, 2001

      43 Jayaram, J., "Contingency Relationships of Firm Size, TQM Duration, Unionization, and Industry Context on TQM Implementation - A Focus on Total Effects" 28 (28): 345-356, 2010

      44 Tenenhaus, M., "Component-Based Structural Equation Modelling" 19 (19): 871-886, 2008

      45 Khandwalla N. P., "Competencies for Senior Manager Roles" 29 (29): 11-24, 2004

      46 Lemak, D. J., "Commitment to Total Quality Management: Is There Relationship with Firm Performance?" 2 : 67-86, 1997

      47 Sila, I., "An Investigation of the Total Quality Management Survey Based Research Published Between 1989 and 2000" 19 (19): 902-970, 2002

      48 Meyer, S. M., "An Empirical Test of the Casual Relationships in the Baldrige Health Care Pilot Criteria" 19 : 403-425, 2001

      49 Wilson, D. D., "An Empirical Investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Causal Model" 31 (31): 361-390, 2000

      50 Huang, Y. S, "An Empirical Investigation of Total Quality Mangement: A Taiwanese Case" 14 (14): 172-181, 2002

      51 Bou-LIusar, J. C., "An Empirical Assessment of the EFQM Excellence Model: Evaluation as a TQM Framework Relative to the MBNQA Model" 27 : 1-22, 2009

      52 Pannirselvam, G. P, "A Study of the Relationships Between the Baldrige Categories" 18 (18): 14-34, 2001

      53 Gefen, D., "A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Notated Example" 16 : 91-109, 2005

      54 Puffer, S. M, "A Framework for Leadership in a TQM Context" 1 (1): 109-130, 1996

      55 Haenlein, M., "A Beginner's Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis" 3 (3): 283-297, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-10-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Jounal of Korea Service Management Society -> Journal of Korea Service Management Society KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.89
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.91 0.96 1.149 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼