RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      경찰의 개인정보 수집·이용에 대한 법치국가적 통제의 필요성 – 수사 목적의 개인정보 처리를 중심으로 – = Regulations on the Collection and Use of Personal Information by Police

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108955783

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The police collect and use personal informations in a wide variety of ways, not only for criminal investigation, but also for the performance of duties of the police officer(Article 2 of Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers). Today, the right to self-determination of personal information is firmly recognized as a fundamental right in the Constitution, and the collection and use of personal information without the consent of the information subject in the course of performing police duties corresponds to the exercise of police power that limits the right to self-determination of personal information. However, in the current legal system, the specific authority rules governing the processing of personal information, such as the collection and use of personal information by the police, are not clearly established. This paper critically examines the problem that there is virtually no rule-of-law control system over the collection and use of personal information by the police, and so proposes a method to control the police's collection and use of personal informations.
      First, the view that interprets Article 2 of Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers and Article 15 (1) of the Personal Information Protection Act as a general provision of authority for the collection of personal information by the police is not justified, because that opinion nullifies the control system based on the ‘rule of law’ principles over the exercise of police power. In addition, Article 199 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act may not be legitimate legal grounds for an investigative agency to request the provision of personal information from other agencies.
      Therefore, fundamental reform is absolutely necessary. The purpose of collecting personal information should be clearly and specifically established, and the scope, requirements, and procedures for collecting personal information necessary to achieve the police purpose should be clearly defined according to the principle of proportionality. In addition, in relation to the collection of personal information without warrant for the purpose of investigation by Article 18 (2) 7 of the Personal Information Protection Act, we must control the risk of abuse through applying the warrant principle. And more stringent requirements and procedures should be established for the collection of sensitive informations.
      번역하기

      The police collect and use personal informations in a wide variety of ways, not only for criminal investigation, but also for the performance of duties of the police officer(Article 2 of Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers). Today, the...

      The police collect and use personal informations in a wide variety of ways, not only for criminal investigation, but also for the performance of duties of the police officer(Article 2 of Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers). Today, the right to self-determination of personal information is firmly recognized as a fundamental right in the Constitution, and the collection and use of personal information without the consent of the information subject in the course of performing police duties corresponds to the exercise of police power that limits the right to self-determination of personal information. However, in the current legal system, the specific authority rules governing the processing of personal information, such as the collection and use of personal information by the police, are not clearly established. This paper critically examines the problem that there is virtually no rule-of-law control system over the collection and use of personal information by the police, and so proposes a method to control the police's collection and use of personal informations.
      First, the view that interprets Article 2 of Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers and Article 15 (1) of the Personal Information Protection Act as a general provision of authority for the collection of personal information by the police is not justified, because that opinion nullifies the control system based on the ‘rule of law’ principles over the exercise of police power. In addition, Article 199 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act may not be legitimate legal grounds for an investigative agency to request the provision of personal information from other agencies.
      Therefore, fundamental reform is absolutely necessary. The purpose of collecting personal information should be clearly and specifically established, and the scope, requirements, and procedures for collecting personal information necessary to achieve the police purpose should be clearly defined according to the principle of proportionality. In addition, in relation to the collection of personal information without warrant for the purpose of investigation by Article 18 (2) 7 of the Personal Information Protection Act, we must control the risk of abuse through applying the warrant principle. And more stringent requirements and procedures should be established for the collection of sensitive informations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼