광개토대왕비문 연구의 몇 가지 문제에 대하여 = 부여의 통치구조와 광개토대왕의 대외 정벌에 관하여

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The tombstone of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To is very important for interpretation of Eastern Asia at around A.D.400. It is true that a great deal of researches on this has been done since the tombstone was introduced for the first time up to present. The direction of the result of the research has been decided according to the profits of the nationalities of the researchers. Especially, Japan and Korea showed tremendous interests on this because they thought according to the interpretations described on the relationships between the two countries on the tombstone will determine the dominion of hegemony at around A.D.400 in Eastern Asia.
However, in this writing, I have put aside this point of an argument and emphasized purely on fresh historical investigation about the facts which were appeared on the tombstone. As a result, the two words, 'Chun-Je' and 'Hwang-Chun' which appear at the beginning of an inscription do not mean God but Royal Palace of Buyeo at that time instead. I think this interpretation will give us a chance to have a new idea about Buyeo different from what we used to think of.
This article is concerned about foreign conquest of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To, one of our prides of Han-Min-Jok. On Middle School Korean History textbooks and on General Introduction of Korean History, the conquered area by the Great King Kwang-Gae-To was written as 64 fortresses and 1400 villages. This was written based on the result of researches had been done in the past. But what I have found out was much more than this :- 128 fortresses, 3 counties and 2800 villages. The formers are obvious errors. Therefore, our academic society must correct these errors as soon as possible.
The writer has presented a few fresh ideas. I think these should be proven by the verification of my school fellows.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 문제 제기
• Ⅲ. 맺음말
• 〈참고문헌〉
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 朴眞奭, "호태왕비와 고대조일관계연구" 연변대학출판사 1993

2 박진석, "북경에서 새로 발견된 일부 호태왕비탁본의 採拓年代 고증" 圓光大 宗敎問題硏究所 25 : 2001

3 延敏洙, "광개토대왕비문에 보이는 대외관계—고구려의 남방경영과국제관계론—" 新書苑 10 : 1995

4 徐德源, "高句麗好太王碑鑿立之原委與性質重探 In: 高句麗渤海硏究集成 3" 哈爾濱出版社 1997

5 武田幸男, "高句麗史と東アジア —廣開土王碑硏究序說—" 岩波書店 1989

6 朴性鳳, "高句麗 金石文의 연구현황과 과제－廣開土好太王碑와 中原高句麗碑를 중심으로－" 78 : 1997

7 崔孟植, "高句麗 廣開土王碑文에 대한 解讀一考<1> In: 先史와 古代 10" 1998

8 손환일, "高句麗 廣開土大王碑 隸書가 新羅 書體에 미친 영향" 고구려발해학회 13 : 2-, 2002

9 國史編纂委員會, "韓國古代金石文資料集 Ⅰ" 國史編纂委員會 1995

10 權悳永, "韓國古代金石文綜合索引" 학연문화사 2002

11 韓國古代社會硏究所, "譯註 韓國古代金石文 Ⅰ" 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院 1992

12 武田幸男, "水谷舊藏精拓本の實狀を求めて" 日本東京大學大學院人文社會系硏究科·文學部朝鮮文化硏究室 7 : 2000

13 李進熙, "廣開土王陵碑의 探求" 일조각 1982

14 李亨求, "廣開土王陵碑 碑文의 특징. In: 韓國史 市民講座 3" 일조각 1988

15 李亨求, "廣開土王陵碑 硏究—所謂 辛卯年記事와 庚子年記事를 中心으로—" 국사편찬위원회 45 : 1993

16 星野良作, "廣開土王碑硏究の軌跡" 吉川弘文館 1991

17 池炳穆, "廣開土王碑文의 體裁와 文章 In: 廣開土王碑文의 新硏究" 서라벌군사연구소 1999

18 朴燦圭, "廣開土王碑文의 神話記事의 分析 In: 廣開土王碑文의 新硏究" 慶州 서라벌군사연구소 1999

19 李道學, "廣開土王碑文에 보이는 地名比定의 재검토 In: 廣開土王碑文의 新硏究" 慶州 서라벌군사연구소 1999

20 白崎昭一郞, "廣開土王碑文の硏究" 吉川弘文館 1993

21 李鍾學, "廣開土王碑文の眞實—軍事史學的硏究方法による辛卯年記事の檢討—" 1630

22 武田幸男, "廣開土王碑原石拓本集成" 東京大出版會 1988

23 東京都目黑區敎育委員會, "廣開土王碑と古代日本" 學生社 1993

24 雄渾社, "廣開土王碑 硏究" 역민사 1985

25 高句麗硏究會, "廣開土好太王碑 硏究 100年" 학연문화사 1996

26 文化財硏究所, "廣開土大王陵碑拓本圖錄 (國內所藏)" 國立文化財硏究所 1996

27 李亨求, "廣開土大王陵碑新硏究" 同和出版公社 1986

28 徐榮洙, "廣開土大王陵碑文의 征服記事 再檢討(上)" 역사학회 96 : 1982

29 이순구, "廣開土大王陵碑 硏究의 現況과 展望 —최근 10년을 중심으로—. In: 한국 인문과학의 현황과 쟁점" 한국정신문화연구원 1998

30 韓國篆刻學硏究會, "廣開土大王碑"

31 耿鐵華, "好太王碑論考" 吉林文史出版社 1994

32 藤田友治, "好太王碑論爭の解明 —改ざん說を否定する—" 新泉社 1986

33 王健群, "好太王碑硏究" 吉林人民出版社 1984

34 寺田隆信, "好太王碑探訪記" 日本放送出版協會 1985

35 李進熙, "好太王碑の謎" 日本古代史を書きかえる—, 講談社 1985