Indications and interpretation of esophageal function testing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Esophageal symptoms are common, and can arise from mucosal, motor, functional, and neoplastic processes, among others. Judicious use of diagnostic testing can help define the etiology of symptoms and can direct management. Endoscopy, esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM), ambulatory pH or pH‐impedance manometry, and barium radiography are commonly used for esophageal function testing; functional lumen imaging probe is an emerging option. Recent consensus guidelines have provided direction in using test findings toward defining mechanisms of esophageal symptoms. The Chicago Classification describes hierarchical steps in diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. The Lyon Consensus characterizes conclusive evidence on esophageal testing for a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and establishes a motor classification of GERD. Taking these recent advances into consideration, our discussion focuses primarily on the indications, technique, equipment, and interpretation of esophageal HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms, and describes indications for alternative esophageal tests.
Esophageal symptoms are common, and can arise from mucosal, motor, functional, and neoplastic processes, among others. This review focuses primarily on the indications, technique, equipment, and interpretation of esophageal high‐resolution manometry (HRM) and ambulatory reflux monitoring in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms, and describes indications for alternative esophageal tests. This image demonstrates a reflux episode on pH impedance monitoring, followed by the patient's recording of a heartburn event.