RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      한국인 하악골 전돌증 환자의 악교정수술을 위한 ENaP(Esthetic NaP)선의 유효성에 관한 연구 = EFFICACY OF ENaP(ESTHETIC NaP)-LINE FOR ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY OF KOREAN MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102531391

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As the most of dentofacial deformity patients indicated to orthognathic surgery have strong desire for esthetic improvement as well as functional improvement, ideal esthetic evaluation should be made at surgical prediction. Lateral cephalographs ha...

      As the most of dentofacial deformity patients indicated to orthognathic surgery have strong desire for
      esthetic improvement as well as functional improvement, ideal esthetic evaluation should be made at surgical
      prediction.
      Lateral cephalographs has been commonly used for surgical prediction, however, remarkable discrepancy
      between esthetic viewpoint by simple looking and analysis on lateral cephalographs often found on evaluation
      of sagittal position of the upper and lower jaws especially in cases of mandibular prognathism of Koreans. In
      these cases, we have been employed Esthetic NaP(ENaP)-line for corrective evaluation and ideal surgical prediction
      on lateral cephalographs, but the efficacy of ENaP-line has not been evaluated.
      This is a study on efficacy of ENaP-line for orthognathic surgery of Korean mandibular prognathism. 170 Korean
      patients who had been diagnosed as mandibular prognathism and planned for orthognathic surgery at Department of
      Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University during last 10 years are studied. The obtained
      results are as followings; among 170 patients of mandibular prognathism, 132 patients(77.6%) had not discrepancy
      in evaluation of sagittal position of the maxilla between cephalometric and esthetic evaluation(they are classified as
      Group I), however, 38 patients(22.4%) had definite discrepancy(they are classified as Group II). ENaP-line was
      employed in all cephalometric analysis of Group II. The proportions of male and female were similar in both Groups.
      Sixteen vertical reference lines perpendicular to 16 horizontal reference lines were obtained as followings;
      Each of the representative degree of ∠SN/AFH, ∠SN/CFH and ∠AFH/CFH obtained at Group I was applied to SN
      plane, AFH plane and CFH plane of Group II each other, and so 16 horizontal reference lines could be obtained
      individually according to each of the applied degree to each plane. And then their reliability to coincide with
      ENaP-line of Group II was evaluated. A vertical reference line perpendicular to a horizontal line made by
      application of the representative degree of ∠AFH/CFH in Group I to AFH line in Group II had the most highest
      coincidence with ENaP-line of Group II, however, its agreement was 42% in male and 47% in female.
      From this results, the rest of them should be determined their corrective jaw position definitely depend on

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.15 0.15 0.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.14 0.597 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼