RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      정책 이성 비판 = A Critique of Policy Reason

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100037679

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In general, policy scientists' foremost interest is at policy. They want to make the policy better and to solve some problem by virtue of the policy. They usually conduct their research with some implicit faith on their reason; their thought and their language. This study wants to examine about the credibility of human thinking and language as the inevitable foundation of policy making. Do the thinking and language work well enough as the core tools to make policy which can impose huge burden to taxpayers? If human mind and language have fatal limits, building a nice policy may be a hard to reach goal. Human thought about social phenomenon can’t be a pure one which is protected from subjective experiences and prejudicial ideas. Hermeneutic thinking is a central process which is performed on the ground of personal experiences. Furthermore, as people usually have little ideas about how their hidden consciousness works, they are also ignorant about the fact that their inconspicuous sediment knowledge affects unwittingly to their understanding of policy situation. Consequently, they mistake frequently that they understand the situation objectively and correctly. Language is another factor to makes policy researcher confuse subjective fabricated words with objective facts. Their language might be on holiday. Unlike physical world, there are no concrete objects that can be pointed as a referent source of the meaning of a word. Instead, policy researchers give the meaning to their word by virtue of their ability to build the meaning intentionally by indexical manner (Garfinkel) within language game. To make matters worse, policy scientists, who have little knowledge of the hidden work of their consciousness, tend to take these abstract words as the concrete ones (the fallacy of misplaced concreteness). Policy analysis can be a writing of novel dressed with gorgeous artificial words.
      번역하기

      In general, policy scientists' foremost interest is at policy. They want to make the policy better and to solve some problem by virtue of the policy. They usually conduct their research with some implicit faith on their reason; their thought and their...

      In general, policy scientists' foremost interest is at policy. They want to make the policy better and to solve some problem by virtue of the policy. They usually conduct their research with some implicit faith on their reason; their thought and their language. This study wants to examine about the credibility of human thinking and language as the inevitable foundation of policy making. Do the thinking and language work well enough as the core tools to make policy which can impose huge burden to taxpayers? If human mind and language have fatal limits, building a nice policy may be a hard to reach goal. Human thought about social phenomenon can’t be a pure one which is protected from subjective experiences and prejudicial ideas. Hermeneutic thinking is a central process which is performed on the ground of personal experiences. Furthermore, as people usually have little ideas about how their hidden consciousness works, they are also ignorant about the fact that their inconspicuous sediment knowledge affects unwittingly to their understanding of policy situation. Consequently, they mistake frequently that they understand the situation objectively and correctly. Language is another factor to makes policy researcher confuse subjective fabricated words with objective facts. Their language might be on holiday. Unlike physical world, there are no concrete objects that can be pointed as a referent source of the meaning of a word. Instead, policy researchers give the meaning to their word by virtue of their ability to build the meaning intentionally by indexical manner (Garfinkel) within language game. To make matters worse, policy scientists, who have little knowledge of the hidden work of their consciousness, tend to take these abstract words as the concrete ones (the fallacy of misplaced concreteness). Policy analysis can be a writing of novel dressed with gorgeous artificial words.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박승억, "후설과 하이데거" 김영사 2007

      2 김진, "현상학과 해석학" 울산대학교출판부 2005

      3 이남인, "현상학과 해석학" 서울대학교출판문화원 2013

      4 Munitz, Milton K., "현대분석철학(Contemporary Analytic Philosophy)" 서광사 1981

      5 목진휴, "한국의 정책연구 지향에 관한 실증분석: Lasswell의 정책 패러다임을 중심으로" 한국정책학회 14 (14): 131-154, 2005

      6 Weber, Max, "프로테스탄트 윤리와 자본주의 정신" 문예출판사 1988

      7 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "철학탐구" 동서문화사 2008

      8 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, "진리와 방법2: 철학적 해석학의 기본적 특징들" 문학동네 2012

      9 James, William, "종교적 경험의 다양성" 한길그레이트북스 1902

      10 최종원, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 2003

      1 박승억, "후설과 하이데거" 김영사 2007

      2 김진, "현상학과 해석학" 울산대학교출판부 2005

      3 이남인, "현상학과 해석학" 서울대학교출판문화원 2013

      4 Munitz, Milton K., "현대분석철학(Contemporary Analytic Philosophy)" 서광사 1981

      5 목진휴, "한국의 정책연구 지향에 관한 실증분석: Lasswell의 정책 패러다임을 중심으로" 한국정책학회 14 (14): 131-154, 2005

      6 Weber, Max, "프로테스탄트 윤리와 자본주의 정신" 문예출판사 1988

      7 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "철학탐구" 동서문화사 2008

      8 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, "진리와 방법2: 철학적 해석학의 기본적 특징들" 문학동네 2012

      9 James, William, "종교적 경험의 다양성" 한길그레이트북스 1902

      10 최종원, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 2003

      11 강근복, "정책분석론" 대영문화사 2002

      12 Dunn. William N, "정책분석론" 법문사 1996

      13 김현권, "일반언어학강의" 지만지 2012

      14 Habermas, Jurgen, "의사소통행위이론1: 행위합리성과 사회합리화" 나남 2011

      15 Carr, E. H. ., "역사란 무엇인가" 까치 1998

      16 에드문트후설, "순수현상학과 현상학적 철학의 이념들" 한길사 2009

      17 Kahneman, Daniel, "생각에 관한 생각(Thinking Fast and Slow)" 김영사 2012

      18 Tocquville, Alexis, de, "미국의 민주주의" 한길사 1997

      19 은재호, "문제정의(problem definition)가 정책변동에미치는 영향 : 프랑스 AIDS 정책을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 41 (41): 243-264, 2007

      20 Lakoff, George, "몸의 철학: 신체화된 마음의서구 사상에 대한 도전(Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought)" 박이정 2005

      21 Varela, Francisco J., "몸의 인지과학" 김영사 2013

      22 Lapsley, Daniel K, "도덕심리학" 중앙적성출판사 2000

      23 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "논리철학논고" 동서문화사 2008

      24 Kuhn, Thomas, "과학혁명의 구조" 까치 1962

      25 카르납, "과학 철학 입문" 서광사 1993

      26 Bloor, David, "Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions" Routledge 1997

      27 Stern, David D., "Wittgensgtein on Mind and Language" Oxford University Press 1995

      28 Read, Rupert, "There is No Such Thing As a Social Science" Ashgate 2008

      29 Schutz, Alfred, "The Structures of the Life-World. 1" Northwestern University Press 1973

      30 Plous, Scott, "The Psychology of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination: An Overview"

      31 Descartes, Rene, "The Principle of Philosophy" Kessinger Legacy Reprints 1644

      32 Smith, David Woodruff, "The Oxford Handbook Of The History Of Analytic Philosophy" Oxford University Press 2013

      33 Mills, Jon, "The Ontology Of Prejudice" 1997

      34 Held, Klaus, "The New Husserl: A Critical Reader" Indiana University Press 2003

      35 Popper, Karl, "The Myth of the Framework" Routledge 1994

      36 Piaget, Jean, "The Moral Judgment of the Child" Free Press 1932

      37 Faber, Marvin, "The Foundation of Phenomenology: Edmunend Husserl and the Quest for a Rigorous Science of Philosophy" Aldine Transaction 1962

      38 Anscombe, G. E. M., "The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe. VolⅢ. Ethics, Religion and Politics" 1981

      39 Gutting, Gary, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 2013

      40 Goldman, Alvin, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 2010

      41 Malpas, Jeff, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 2013

      42 Bohman, James, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 2013

      43 Wheeler, Michael, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 2013

      44 Schutz, Alfred, "Some Leading Concept of Phenomenology" 9 : 1944

      45 Spector, Malcolm, "Social Problems: A Re-Formulation" 21 : 1973

      46 Blumer, Herber, "Social Problems as Collective Behavior" (18) : 1971

      47 Ackoff, Russell, "Russell Ackoff: A Lifetime of Systems Thinking" (115) : 1999

      48 Putnam, Hilary, "Reason, Truth and History" Cambridge University Press 1981

      49 Bax, Chantal, "Reading On Certainty Through the Lens of Cavell:Scepticism, Dogmatism and the Groundlessness of our Believing" 2013

      50 Anscombe, G. E. M. ., "On Promising and Its Justice. and Whether It Needs be Respected in Foro Interno" 3 (3): 61-83, 1969

      51 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "On Certanity" Blackwell 1969

      52 Ravaisson, Félix, "Of Habit" Continuum 2008

      53 Held, Richard, "Movement-Produced Stimulation in the Development of Visually Guided Behavior" 56 (56): 872-876, 1963

      54 Searle, John R., "Mind: A Brief Introduction" Oxford University Press 2007

      55 Searle, John R. ., "Mind, Language, and Society : Philosophy in the Real World" Basic Books 1998

      56 Dreyfus, Hubert L., "Mind over Machine" The Free Press 1986

      57 Follesdal, Dagfinn, "Mind and Meaning" Philosophical Studies 94-, 1994

      58 Searle, John R., "Making The Social World" Oxford Univ. Press 2010

      59 Husserl, Edmund, "Logical Investigation. Vol. 1" Humanity Books 2000

      60 Sokolowski, Robert, "Introduction to Phenomenology" Cambridge University Press 2000

      61 Robinson, Dave, "Introducing Empiricism" Icon Books 2004

      62 Harney, Maurita J, "Intentionality, Sense and the Mind" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1983

      63 Austin, J. L., "How To Do Things With Words" Oxford University Press 1962

      64 Dreyfus, Hubert L., "Holism and Hermeneutics" 34 : 1980

      65 Ramberg, Bjørn, "Hermeneutics" Wikipedia 2005

      66 Laverty, Susann M. ., "Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology:A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations" 2 (2): 2003

      67 Blattner, William, "Heidegger's Being and Time: A Reader's Guide" Continum International Publishing Group 2009

      68 Braver, Lee, "Groundless Grounds: A Study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger" The MIT Press 2012

      69 Heritage, John, "Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology" Polity Press 1984

      70 Cowart, Monica, "Embodied Cognition"

      71 Schutz, Alfred, "Common-sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action" 14 : 1-, 1953

      72 Schutz, Alfred, "Collected Papers1: The Problem of Social Reality" Martinus Nijhoff 1962

      73 Heidegger, Martin, "Being and Time" Harper & Row. Publishers 1962

      74 Steinbock, Anthony J. ., "Analyses Conerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

      75 Husserl, Edmund, "Analyses Conerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

      76 Gergen, Kenneth J., "An Invitation to Social Construction" SAGE 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼