아서 단토의 미술종말론과 그 근거로서 팝아트의 두 가지 함의

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, I try to analyze Danto’s 'End of Art' and to elucidate Pop Art’s significance in his theory. Danto claims that the advent of Pop Art gives rise to a structural change in visual art. First, Its advent shows us that we can't identify an artwork only by means of sensible property. Second, It shows us that anything can become an artwork only after the 1960’s.
Danto claims that to discern an artwork from the mere thing, we need to know a representational property which is perceptually unavailable. Also he claims that its awareness brings about the end of art. An artwork possesses a representational property which an object which is perceptually indiscernible from the work of art does not possess. Its sense brings about the change of belief systems on art in the West.
His claim that art has ended is not a logical conclusion derived from his philosophical premises, but an empirical claim drawn from the change of belief systems on art in the West. His claim that the narrative which started from Renaissance has ended is not an arbitrary narrative which he fabricates, but based upon the objective structure of art scenes in the West.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 미술의 종말과 그 이후의 미술 : 무엇이든지 미술이 될 수 있는 시기
• 2. 팝아트가 지닌 첫번째 함의 : 지각적 식별 불가능성과 ‘의미의 구현’
• 3. 팝아트가 지닌 두번째 함의 : 미술에 대한 믿음체계의 변화와 내러티브의 종말
• 4. 다원주의 미술의 시대 : 배타적인 미술의 종말과 미술의 역할의 변화
• 참고문헌
• Abstract