RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Research Needs in Librarianship

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104111129

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Library and information research is often directed towards either the management of resources (e.g., the economics of resource management), their storage and retrieval (e.g., much information retrieval research), and the users of these resources (the ...

      Library and information research is often directed towards either the management of resources (e.g., the economics of resource management), their storage and retrieval (e.g., much information retrieval research), and the users of these resources (the whole area of information behaviour. However, the question that is less often asked is, “What research do librarians want to have carried out to help them in their work?” Clearly, some of the topics just mentioned will fall into the priority areas, but what do librarians actually perceive will be of use to them. There is a notion that a research-practice gap exists in the field and perhaps the reason for that is that researchers do not ask the practioners what research will be of value to them. To find an answer to this question on a global basis would, of course, be impossible – at least impossible without the level of funding that would be difficult to obtain from any source. However, it is possible to carry out research on a national level that could prove useful both to practitioners and to the library and information research community. This was the aim of a project, supported by the Svensk Biblioteksförening (Swedish Library Association), which was carried out in 2008/2009. Ideas on potential research projects were collected from librarians themselves, from discussion group archives and from the professional journals in a number of countries. These ideas were then grouped thematically and formed the basis of two rounds of a Delphi process to solicit the opinions of a panel of librarians in different sectors, recommended by their peers as ‘expert’ in their field. The Delphi process was concluded with a workshop involving a subset of the panel. This paper will report on the results of the investigation, which attracted a great deal of interest within the profession in Sweden, and will also reflect on issues that were ranked lowly in the investigation. For example, not a great deal of priority was given to topics relating to the development and use of technology: why was this? And would the same result be found in other countries? One major area of research interest was into the future of libraries and a topic of relevance here, especially for academic and research libraries, is the changing information behaviour of researchers: what, now, do researchers want of libraries? Clearly, technology is playing a role here, but digitized resources and the World Wide Web may not be the answer to every researcher’s need. Research into libraries and research for libraries ought to figure largely in the profession’s view of its aims, objectives and visions of the future: but for it to do so requires a recognition that the work will not be done unless researchers and practitioners come together to determine how to approach the future.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Dalkey, N. C., "The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion" The RAND Corporation 1969

      2 Research Information Network, "Patterns of information use and exchange: case studies of researchers in the life sciences" Research Information Network

      3 Thomson, C., "Overcoming the research-practice gap. in : Nursing research secrets: questions and answers reveal the secrets to successful research and publication" Hanley & Belfus 15-24, 2003

      4 Robinson, V.M.J., "Methodology and the research-practice gap" 27 (27): 17-26, 1998

      5 Blick, A. R., "Information science research versus the practitioner" Elsevier 1983

      6 Research Information Network, "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0" Research Information Network 2010

      7 Haddow, G., "Communication of research to practice: closing the gap" 26 (26): 29-43, 2004

      8 Research Information Network, "Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings" Research Information Network 2009

      9 General Teaching Council of England, "CPD leader resource. Diamond nine activity" General Teaching Council of England

      10 Carnine, D., "Bridging the research-to-practice gap" 63 (63): 513-521, 1997

      1 Dalkey, N. C., "The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion" The RAND Corporation 1969

      2 Research Information Network, "Patterns of information use and exchange: case studies of researchers in the life sciences" Research Information Network

      3 Thomson, C., "Overcoming the research-practice gap. in : Nursing research secrets: questions and answers reveal the secrets to successful research and publication" Hanley & Belfus 15-24, 2003

      4 Robinson, V.M.J., "Methodology and the research-practice gap" 27 (27): 17-26, 1998

      5 Blick, A. R., "Information science research versus the practitioner" Elsevier 1983

      6 Research Information Network, "If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0" Research Information Network 2010

      7 Haddow, G., "Communication of research to practice: closing the gap" 26 (26): 29-43, 2004

      8 Research Information Network, "Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings" Research Information Network 2009

      9 General Teaching Council of England, "CPD leader resource. Diamond nine activity" General Teaching Council of England

      10 Carnine, D., "Bridging the research-to-practice gap" 63 (63): 513-521, 1997

      11 Maceviciute, E., Wilson, T.D. Lalloo, I., "A Delphi study of research needs for Swedish librarians.” Science for the professions Report, no. 5"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.67 0.952 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼