구사론주 세친(Vasubandhu) 緣起觀의 연속과 불연속 = The Continuity and Discontinuity of Vasubandhu's View of Dependent Origination -With special reference to the interpretation of "saṃskārapratyayaṃ vijñānam" in Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (AKBh) and Pratītyasam

국문 초록 (Abstract)

세친은 『구사론』단계에서부터 십이지연기의 식을 結生識으로 이해하는 유부의 입장을 비판한다. 『구사론』에서 세친은 12지연기의식을 유부처럼 결생식(의식)으로 보지 않고 업행(업의 행위)이 추동하는 힘 때문에 촉발되는 六識의 흐름(vijñānasantati)으로 본다. 여기서 세친이 말하는 '육식의 흐름'은 전생을 떠나 중유를 매개 로 다음 생까지 연결되는識相續이기 때문에 중유단계의 결생식을 포괄하는 것이다.
세친의 이러한 견해는 또한 식의 흐름을 조건으로 현세의 명색에서부터 새로운 생명의 잉태가 시작된다고 본다(식연명색)는 점에서 이미 결생식에서부터 현생이 시작되었다고 보는 유부와 대립한다. 이 경우 식은 유부에서처럼 새로운 생명의 탄생(결생)이 아니라 탄생 직전까지의 업상속을 유지하는 '매개자 혹은 원인' 역할로 이해된다. 식의 역할이 '새로운 생과의 결합'(결생)이라는 연기의 결과적 측면에서 새로운 생으로의 연결적 매개자로 변한 것이다.
이는 12지연기에서의 식의 역 할과 관련하여 중요한 것을 시사한다. 유부 입장에서 1 2지연기로 표현되는 생사윤회 과정의 주요 매개체는 오온이다. 오온이 윤회하는 것이다. 따라서 식지의 식은 다만 이 유전과정의 오온의 상태 즉, 결생은(관용적으로 결생식)을 나타낸다. 반면 구사론주 세친의 종국적인 입장은 윤회의 매개를 오온의 상속(흐름)이 아니라 육식의 상속으로 본다. 세친의 『연기경석』은 "과거업에 의해 훈습된 식"이라는 개념을 통해 기존의 육식설을 이론적으로 한층 강화한다. 본고는 세친의 識說이 『구사론』과 『연기경석 』을 통해 어떤식으로 진화해 나가는지를 세친 사상의 '점진적 발전 모델'에 의거해 설명한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The doctrine of Dependent Origination (pratītyāsamutpāda) has generally been accepted as one of the central teachings of the Buddha since the inception of Buddhism. The earliest form of Dependent Origination is embodied in the twelve links of dependent origination. Over the course of time, however, an interpretation of the specific workings of each link of the causal chain varied depending on the Buddhist school. Sarvāstivādins came to understand the causal chain as symbolizing the causal sequence of three-time periods (past, present and future) that sentient beings undergo, impelled by their actions (karma). That is to say, they viewed the twelve links of dependent origination as an endless process of causation through which sentient beings, consisting of five aggregates, die, get reborn, grow, and die again. What plays an important role in this process is, in their perspective, the five aggregates which constitute a human being.
Within this interpretative scheme of the chain of Dependent Origination, each link such as ignorance (avidyā) was no longer literally considered as ignorance per se, but as a symbolic representative of the five aggregates that go through the recycle process. This Sarvāstivāda interpretation of Dependent Origination is specifically called 'the theory of a state (avasthā) [of five aggregates]', which means that it is after all the five aggregates which undergo the twelve causal chains of dependent origination. In this respect, the Sarvāstivādadins interpreted 'conditioned by karmic activities (saṃskāra), consciousness (vijñāna) arises', as representing that 'conditioned by a given state or stage of five aggregates, the main feature of which is karmic activities in the rebirth process, there arises another given state of five aggregates which feature consciousness.' This kind of understanding was led to as a result of this five aggregates-centered interpretation of Dependent Origination.
In the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (AKBh), Vasubandhu provides two irreconcilable accounts of the causal chain; one is the standard Sarvāstivāda interpretation as outlined above and the other is a Sautrāntika critique of it. In the Sautrāntika (scripturalist) view, the theory of Dependent Origination does not represent developmental states or stages of a rebirth process that the five aggregates go through, as Sarvāstivādins argue. For them, the meaning of each link of the chain should not be interpreted as symbolic, but as literal. Thus, the above example should be reinterpreted as 'conditioned by karmic activities, [the stream of] consciousness arises [thus effected]', which emphasizes the actual role of each link in the causal chain. Thus Sautrāntika understanding further developed in Vasubandhu's post-AKBh Yogācāra-leaning texts such as the Pratītyasamutpādavyākhyā (PSVy), which resulted in his eventual interpretation of Dependent Origination as the transformation process of ālayavijñāna (storehouse consciousness).
What this essay aims to explore is how Vasubandu's view of Dependent Origination changes through his major texts such as AKBh and PSVy; more specifically, it focuses on the interpretation of the phrase ' conditioned by karmic activities, consciousness arises' (saṃskārapratyayaṃ vijñānam) and shows how Vasubandhu developed a consciousness-based interpretative scheme of Depedent Origination over time. Thereby it attempts to shed some new light on the transformative character of Vasubandhu's ideologies epitomized in his AKBh and post-AKBh texts. This will help us clear up some of the mischaracterizations of Vasubandhu, either as an originally Mahāyāna Yogācārin as argued by some of the modern scholars, or as a sudden or dramatic convert to Mahāyāna as depicted by Param

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약문
• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말: 世親思想을 바라보는 시각들
• Ⅱ. 『구사론』에 나타난 有部分位緣起說
• Ⅲ. 구사론주 세친의 분위연기설 비판
• Ⅳ. 『緣起經釋』(PSVy) 에서의 세친의 識支해석
• Ⅴ. 나가는 말: 識개념을 통해 본 세친 사상의 연속과불연속
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박창환, "한국 부파ㆍ아비달마 불교학의 연구성과와 과제" 한국불교학회 68 : 37-87, 2013

2 권오민, "연기법이 불타 자내증이라는 경증 검토-불타 깨달음은 연기법인가?(1)" 보조사상연구원 (27) : 411-448, 2007

3 권오민, "상좌 슈리라타와 경량부" 씨아알 2012

4 권오민, "사성제와 12연기: 불타 깨달음은 연기법인가?(II)" 한국불교학회 (47) : 7-50, 2007

5 박창환, "마음과 철학: 불교편" 서울대 출판부 2013

6 박창환, "구사론주(kośakāra) 세친(Vasubandhu)의 현상주의적 언어철학" 동아시아불교문화학회 (14) : 25-77, 2013

7 박창환, "구사론주(kośakāra) 세친(Vasubandhu)과 『능가경』(Laṅkāvatārasūtra)" 인도철학회 (32) : 251-293, 2011

8 박창환, "구사론주(Kośakāra)세친(Vasubandhu)의 번뇌론" 중앙승가대학교 (4) : 2012

9 박창환, "구사논주 세친의 극미(paramāṇu) 실체론 비판과 그 인식론적 함의" 불교문화연구소 (8) : 221-292, 2010

10 Xuánzàng., "阿毘達磨順正理論 (*Nyāyānusāra ). Sa9ghabhadra"

11 Hsüan-tsang., "阿毘達磨法蘊足論 (Dharmaskandha ). Śāriputra (Skt.), Mahāmaudgalyāyana (Ch.)"

12 Hsüan-tsang., "阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論 (*Vibhāṣā )"

13 室寺義仁, "阿毘達磨倶舎論』における’utsūtra’" 日本印度學佛敎學硏究會 54 (54): 2006

14 Xuánzàng 玄奘, "阿毘達磨俱舍論 (Abhidharmakośabhāṣya ). Vasubandhu"

15 Xuánzàng., "緣起經 (Pratītyasamutpādasūtra )"

16 加藤純章, "経量部の研究" 春秋社

17 Xuánzàng., "瑜伽師地論 (Yogācārabhūmiśāstra ). Maiteya"

18 福 田琢, "法蘊足論の 十二支緣起說" 1989

19 박창환, "法稱(Dharmakīrti)의 감각지각(indriyapratyakṣa)론은 과연 經量部적인가? __上座 슈리라타(Ṡrīlāta)의 감각지각 불신론과 이에 대한 世親의 절충론을 통해 본 경량부 前5識說의 전개 과정__" 인도철학회 (27) : 5-51, 2009

20 室寺義仁, "成業論" 1985

21 眞諦 Paramārtha., "婆藪槃豆法師傳"

22 宇井伯壽, "印度哲學研究第二卷" 岩波書店 1965

23 松田和信, "分別縁起初勝法門経（ĀVVS—経量部世親の縁起説）" 1982

24 室寺義仁, "倶舎論『』成業論『』縁起経釈』" 1986

25 楠本信道, "俱舎論における世親の緣起観" 平楽寺書店 2007

26 Pǔguāng 普光, "俱舍論記"

27 松田和信, "世親"縁起経釈(PSVy)"におけるアーラヤ識の定義" 日本印度學佛敎學硏究會 31 (31): 1982

28 室寺義仁, "ヴァスバンドゥによるアーラヤ識概念の受容とその応用" 28 : 1993

29 안성두, "「瑜伽師地論」의 緣起說― 識支를 중심으로 ―" 불교학연구회 (5) : 9-246, 2002

30 原田和宗, "〈経量部の「単層の」識の流れ〉という概念への疑問 (I)" インド哲学研究会 1 : 1996

31 Schmithausen, Lambert, "Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy. Vol. 4a and 4b" 1987

32 Kritzer, Robert, "Ākṣepahetu and Abhinirvṛttihetu : Among the Ten hetus and in Interpretations of the Pratītyasamutpāda Formula" 42 (42): 28-33, 1994

33 "Y ogācārabhūmi (YBh )"

34 Kritzer, Robert, "Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 44" Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien 1999

35 Park, Changhwan, "Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde" Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien

36 松田和信, "Vyākhyāyuktiの二諦説—Vasubandhu 研究ノート(2)" 日本印度學佛敎學硏究會 33 (33): 1985

37 Lévi, Sylvain., "Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi: Deux Traités de Vasubandhu:Viṃśatikā et Triṃśikā" Libairie Ancienne Honoré Champion 1925

38 Sylvain Lévi, "Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi : Deux Traités de Vasubandhu:Viṃśatikā et Triṃśikā" Libairie Ancienne Honoré Champion 1925

39 "Vasubandhu’s Pratītyasamutpādavyakhyā (PSVy )"

40 Mejor, Marek, "Vasubandhu‘s Abhidharmakośa and the Commentaries Presented in the Tanjur , Alt- und Neu-Indische Studien" Franz Steiner Verlag 1991

41 Park, Changhwan, "Vasubandhu, the Kośakāra‘s Yogācāra Realism in the Vyākhyāyukti" 2013

42 松田和信, "Vasubandhu 研究ノート(1)" 日本印度學佛敎學硏究會 32 (32): 1984

43 Kritzer, Robert, "Vasubandhu on saṃskārapratyayaṃ vijñānam" 16 (16): 24-55, 1993

44 Bhattacharya, Vidhushekhara, "The Yogācārabhūmi of ācārya Asa9ga . Part 1" University of Calcutta 1957

45 Harvey, Peter, "The Selfless Mind" Curzon Press 1995

46 Park, Changhwan, "The Sautrāntika Theory of Seeds (bīja ) Revisited" UC Berkeley 2007

47 Park, Changhwan, "The Foundation for Yoga Practitioners : The Yogācārabhūmi and Its Adaptation in India, East Asia, and Tibet" Harvard Oriental Series 2013

48 Buescher, Hartmut, "The Foundation for Yoga Practitioners" 2013

49 Rhys Davids, T.W., "The Dīghanikāya . 3 vols. 1889-1910" The Pali Text Society 1977

50 N.H. Samtati, "The Arthaviniścaya-Sūtra and its Commentary (Nibandhana)" Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Instituet 1971

51 Kritzer, Robert, "Studia Philologica Buddhica Monograph Series XVIII" The International Institute for Buddhist Studies 2005

52 Wogihara Unrai, "Sphuṭārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā : The Work of Yaśomitra" The Publishing Association of theA bhidharmakośavyākhyā 1932

53 Collins, Steven, "Selfless Person: Imagery and Thought in Theravāda Buddhism" Cambridge University Press 1980

54 Schmithausen, Lambert, "Sautrāntika-Voraussetzungen in Viṃśatikā und Triṃśikā" 11 : 109-136, 1967

55 Kritzer, Robert, "Rūpa and the antarābhava" 28 (28): 235-272, 2000

56 Cox, Collett, "Researches in Indian and Buddhist Philosophy" Motilal Banarsidass 119-141, 1993

57 Frauwallner, Erich, "On the Date of the Buddhist Master of the Law. Vol. III" Serie Orientale 1956

58 Mejor, Marek, "On Vasubandhu’s Pratītyasamutpādavyākhyā"

59 Muroji Yoshihito G., "Institut für Kultur und Geschichte Indiens und Tibets an der Universität Hamburg" Franz Steiner Verlag 1993

60 "Guṇamati’s Pratītyasamutpādavyakhyāṭīkā (PSVyṬ )"

61 Kritzer, Robert, "General Introduction [to the issue of the Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies entitled The Sautrāntikas ]" 26 (26): 201-224, 2003

62 TripāṬhī, Chandrabhāl, "Fünfundzwanzig Sūtras des Nidāna-saṃyukta" Akademie Verlag 1962

63 Dietz, Siglinde, "Fragmente des Dharmaskandha : Ein Abhidharma-Text in Sanskrit aus Gilgit" 1984

64 Kalupahana, David J., "Causality : The Central Philosophy of Buddhism" The University Press of Hawaii 1975

65 Tatia, Nathmal, "Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣyam" Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute 1976

66 松田和信, "Abhidharmasamuccaya における十二支縁起の解釈" 1 : 1983

67 Pradhan, P., "Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam of Vasubandhu" Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute 1975

68 Dwārikādās Śāstrī, "Abhidharmakośa & Bhāṣya of Ācārya Vasubandhu with Sphutārthā Commentary of Ācārya Yaśomitra" Bauddha Bharati 1987

69 Padmanabh S. Jaini, "Abhidharmadīpa with Vibhāṣā-prabhāvṛtti" Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute 1977

70 Cox, Collett, "Abhidharma and Indian Thought: Essays in Honor of Professor Doctor Junsho Kato on His Sixtieth Birthday" Shunju-sha 31-47, 2000

71 Pradhan, P., "Abhidharma Samuccaya of Asanga" Visva-Bharati Santiniketan 1950

72 "A bhidharmakośabhāṣya (AKBh )"