RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to develop a scientific creativity task which science-gifted elementary students can conduct on a field trip to a botanical garden, and to analyze the results from conducting the task. For this, 38 science- gifted fifth-graders from the Science-Gifted Education Center, located at the Office of Education, participated in a field trip to a botanical garden, as a part of their program. Prior to the program, researchers developed a scientific creativity task for outdoor education program, along with science education specialists and teachers. The tasks were to observe plants, and to create something new and useful, or, in other words, scientifically creative, based on the plants’ characteristics. The students could submit at most three ideas. Also, they assessed their own ideas, and selected an idea that they thought was the most creative. The results were analyzed by using the scientific creativity formula. The main findings from this study are as follows. First, it was found that the scientific creativity formula had an upward bias in assessing originality. Second, the students tended to assess the usefulness of their own ideas more generously. Third, the correlation between self-assessment results and scores from the scientific creativity formula for originality was r=.43. Fourth, in formula-based assessments, the correlation between originality scores and usefulness scores was relatively high, at r=.56. Fifth, the correlation between a student’s scientific creativity score and the number of his or her ideas was very low, at r=.23. Sixth, when the ideas chosen as the most creative by students were compared with the ideas that had the highest scores in formula-based assessments, it was shown that 8 out of 19 students (42.1%) did not choose the idea that appeared to be the most creative when graded by the formula. This study is concluded by discussing the lessons from the scientific creativity task analysis for primary science education and gifted education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김민주, "초등과학영재학생의 발표에 대한 인식 및 발표의 자발성과 과학창의성의 관계 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 38 (38): 331-344, 2019

2 김민주, "초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성에 대한 자기 평가, 동료 평가의 비교 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 38 (38): 439-452, 2019

3 김민주, "초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성과 다중지능의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 -" 한국초등과학교육학회 39 (39): 369-381, 2020

4 김현주, "초등과학영재학생의 과학지식과 과학창의성의 관계- 생명 영역을 중심으로 -" 한국초등과학교육학회 39 (39): 382-398, 2020

5 이재무, "체육영재, 학업영재, 일반 초등학생의 다중지능, 정서지능 특성비교" 한국체육과학회 19 (19): 609-622, 2010

6 조연순, "창의적 문제 해결력 신장을 위한중학교 과학 교육과정 개발" 20 (20): 329-343, 2000

7 한기순, "창의성의 영역 한정성과 영역 보편성에 관한 분석과 탐구" 10 (10): 47-69, 2000

8 김명숙, "창의성의 영역 특수성과 영역 일반성의 절충적 대안 탐색: 창의적 잠재력과 창의적 수행을 중심으로" 한국교육심리학회 19 (19): 1139-1158, 2005

9 김영채, "창의력의 영역 보편성과 특수성: 쟁점과 TTCT 창의력 검사의 분석" 대한사고개발학회 8 (8): 1-29, 2012

10 최인수, "유아용 창의성 측정도구에 관한 고찰" 20 (20): 139-166, 2000