RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Effects of Corporate Ownership and Governance Structures on Cash Holdings and Performance of Chinese Firms

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106228930

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study empirically examines the impact of corporate ownership and governance structures on cash holding of Chinese firms as well as how differently the firms use cash reserves depending on their ownership and governance structures. We also examine the impact on business performance.
      We find that the corporate ownership and governance structures affect the cash-holding tendency of Chinese firms. Firms with higher largest shareholders' equity ownership and smaller board size held more cash reserves. By contrast, firms with diffuse ownership structure and larger board size might have less efficient monitoring and decision-making mechanism, and therefore waste resources for inefficient capital expenditure and R&D expenditure. Therefore, the latter firms have less cash reserves.
      In addition, the difference in cash usage affects firm performance, and firms with lower largest shareholders' ownership and larger board size show lower ratio of operating profit to sales. However, firms with higher largest shareholders' ownership and smaller board size show better corporate performance.
      Lastly, the ownership and governance structures also affect the dividend policy, and firms with higher largest shareholders' ownership are likely to pay more dividends since they have more cash reserves. Those with lower largest shareholders' ownership do not distribute internal cash reserves to shareholders. These results imply that firms with lower largest shareholders' ownership and diffuse ownership structure have more serious agency problem between shareholders and managers. Therefore, more efficient and stronger monitoring mechanism should be established.
      As for the board size, smaller board of directors seems to be more efficient, and outside directors do not play a relevant role since they do not affect the cash-holding tendency. Chinese firms' outside directors might be less independent, and the function of board of directors should be strengthened.
      번역하기

      This study empirically examines the impact of corporate ownership and governance structures on cash holding of Chinese firms as well as how differently the firms use cash reserves depending on their ownership and governance structures. We also examine...

      This study empirically examines the impact of corporate ownership and governance structures on cash holding of Chinese firms as well as how differently the firms use cash reserves depending on their ownership and governance structures. We also examine the impact on business performance.
      We find that the corporate ownership and governance structures affect the cash-holding tendency of Chinese firms. Firms with higher largest shareholders' equity ownership and smaller board size held more cash reserves. By contrast, firms with diffuse ownership structure and larger board size might have less efficient monitoring and decision-making mechanism, and therefore waste resources for inefficient capital expenditure and R&D expenditure. Therefore, the latter firms have less cash reserves.
      In addition, the difference in cash usage affects firm performance, and firms with lower largest shareholders' ownership and larger board size show lower ratio of operating profit to sales. However, firms with higher largest shareholders' ownership and smaller board size show better corporate performance.
      Lastly, the ownership and governance structures also affect the dividend policy, and firms with higher largest shareholders' ownership are likely to pay more dividends since they have more cash reserves. Those with lower largest shareholders' ownership do not distribute internal cash reserves to shareholders. These results imply that firms with lower largest shareholders' ownership and diffuse ownership structure have more serious agency problem between shareholders and managers. Therefore, more efficient and stronger monitoring mechanism should be established.
      As for the board size, smaller board of directors seems to be more efficient, and outside directors do not play a relevant role since they do not affect the cash-holding tendency. Chinese firms' outside directors might be less independent, and the function of board of directors should be strengthened.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김동순, "중국기업의 경영자보상이 미래 기업성과에 미치는 영향" 한국국제경영학회 28 (28): 77-106, 2017

      2 박춘화, "중국기업 최고경영자팀의 특성이 국제 인수합병 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국국제경영학회 30 (30): 1-22, 2019

      3 김지수, "중국 국유기업과 비국유기업에 대한 투자의 현금흐름 민감도 차이분석" 한국국제경영학회 21 (21): 1-30, 2010

      4 Easterbrook, F., "Two Agency Cost Explanations of Dividends" 74 : 650-659, 1984

      5 Baumol, W. J., "The Transactions Demand for Money: An Inventory Theoretic Approach" 66 : 545-556, 1952

      6 Demsetz, H., "The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences" 93 : 1155-1177, 1985

      7 Opler, T., "The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings" 52 : 3-46, 1999

      8 Muth, M., "Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A Contingency Approach" 6 (6): 5-28, 1998

      9 Fama, E., "Separation of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm" 375-393, 1983

      10 Ma, L, "Review of the Board’s Intervention in the Company’s Strategic Literature Based on the Perspective of Multivariate Theory" 10 (10): 2013

      1 김동순, "중국기업의 경영자보상이 미래 기업성과에 미치는 영향" 한국국제경영학회 28 (28): 77-106, 2017

      2 박춘화, "중국기업 최고경영자팀의 특성이 국제 인수합병 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국국제경영학회 30 (30): 1-22, 2019

      3 김지수, "중국 국유기업과 비국유기업에 대한 투자의 현금흐름 민감도 차이분석" 한국국제경영학회 21 (21): 1-30, 2010

      4 Easterbrook, F., "Two Agency Cost Explanations of Dividends" 74 : 650-659, 1984

      5 Baumol, W. J., "The Transactions Demand for Money: An Inventory Theoretic Approach" 66 : 545-556, 1952

      6 Demsetz, H., "The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences" 93 : 1155-1177, 1985

      7 Opler, T., "The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings" 52 : 3-46, 1999

      8 Muth, M., "Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A Contingency Approach" 6 (6): 5-28, 1998

      9 Fama, E., "Separation of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm" 375-393, 1983

      10 Ma, L, "Review of the Board’s Intervention in the Company’s Strategic Literature Based on the Perspective of Multivariate Theory" 10 (10): 2013

      11 Comment, J., "Poison or Placebo : Evidence on the Deterrence and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures" 39 : 3-43, 1995

      12 Jensen, M. C., "Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives" 98 : 225-264, 1990

      13 Leech, D., "Ownership Structure, Control Type Classifications and the Performance of Large British Companies" 101 (101): 1418-1437, 1991

      14 Pinkowitz, L., "Multinationals and the High Cash Holdings Puzzle" Ohio State University Fisher College of Business working paper series 2012

      15 Stulz, R., "Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies" 26 : 3-27, 1990

      16 Shleifer, A., "Large Shareholders and Corporate Control" 94 : 461-488, 1986

      17 La Porta, R., "Investor Protection and Corporate Governance" 58 : 3-27, 2000

      18 Lins, K., "International Evidence on Cash Holdings and Expected Managerial Agency Problems" University of Utah 2004

      19 Dittmar, A., "International Corporate Governance and Corporate Cash Holdings" 38 : 111-133, 2003

      20 Yiling Piao, "International Aspects of Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Performance of Chinese Listed Firms: Moderating Effect of Organizational Slack" 한국국제경영학회 29 (29): 85-112, 2018

      21 Yermack, D., "Higher Market Valuation Companies with a Small Board of Directors" 40 : 185-212, 1996

      22 Liao, L., "Does Corporate Governance affects the Company’s Cash Holdings? Empirical Evidence from Chinses Listed Companies" 6 : 2009

      23 Li, C, "Does Board Characteristics Affect Company Performance?" 5 : 2004

      24 Pinkowitz, L., "Do Firms with Poor Protection of Investor Rights Hold More Cash?" Georgetown University 2004

      25 Dittmar, A., "Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings" 83 : 599-634, 2007

      26 Harford, J., "Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings in the U. S" 87 : 535-555, 2008

      27 Xin, Y., "Corporate Governance Mechanism and Excess Cash Holdings" Management World 2006

      28 Myers, S., "Corporate Financing Decisions when Firms Have Investment Information that Investors Do Not" 13 : 187-221, 1984

      29 Hoskisson, R. E., "Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance" 37 : 1207-1251, 1994

      30 Harford, J., "Corporate Cash Reserves and Acquisitions" 54 : 1969-1997, 1999

      31 Faleye, O., "Cash and Corporate Control" 59 : 2041-2060, 2004

      32 Li, G, "Analysis of Institutional Investors’ Dividend Screening Ability" 1 : 2009

      33 Hu, G., "Analysis of Corporate Ownership and Cash Holdings Level in Chinese Listed Companies" 4 : 39-44, 2006

      34 Jensen, M. C., "Agency Costs of the Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers" 76 : 323-329, 1986

      35 Shleifer, A., "A Survey of Corporate Governance" 52 : 737-783, 1997

      36 Lipton, M., "A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance" 48 : 59-77, 1992

      37 Miller, M. H., "A Model of Demand for Money by Firms" 80 : 413-435, 1966

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-07-21 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Academy of International Business KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.45 2.45 2.15
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.25 2.33 4.114 0.56
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼