RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      텍스트변형이 고등학생들의 읽기텍스트에 대한 흥미도 · 이해도 및 읽기이해에 미치는 영향 = The effect of text modification on high school students' interestingness comprehensibility, and reading comprehension

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study which partially replicated two previous studies (Choi, 2006a, 2006b) explored how the two types of text modification techniques (seductive detail augmentation & concrete elaboration) affect the interestingness, comprehensibility, and reading comprehension(main idea, inferential idea) of 204 second-year high school students, via a survey questionnaire, three types of reading passages(baseline, baseline+seductive details, concretized version of baseline), and multiple choice comprehension questions. Several pedagogically important findings are observed. First, both seductive detail augmentation and concrete elaboration failed to promote the participants' interestingness and their comprehensibility of the texts they read. Second, the participants' language proficiency levels appear to be a potent predictor of the degree of the participants' interestingness regarding the text. Third, seductive detail segments significantly interfered with main idea comprehension of the participants, whereas it showed no detrimental effect on inferential idea comprehension. Fourth, concrete elaboration may have the potential to facilitate inferential idea comprehension. Finally, no statistically significant interaction was found between text modification techniques and language proficiency levels(high, low) for the all dependent variables(interestingness, comprehensibility, main idea & inferential idea comprehension). Findings of the study have a direct bearing on EFL high school students, their English teachers, and textbook designers for EFL high school students.
      번역하기

      The present study which partially replicated two previous studies (Choi, 2006a, 2006b) explored how the two types of text modification techniques (seductive detail augmentation & concrete elaboration) affect the interestingness, comprehensibility, and...

      The present study which partially replicated two previous studies (Choi, 2006a, 2006b) explored how the two types of text modification techniques (seductive detail augmentation & concrete elaboration) affect the interestingness, comprehensibility, and reading comprehension(main idea, inferential idea) of 204 second-year high school students, via a survey questionnaire, three types of reading passages(baseline, baseline+seductive details, concretized version of baseline), and multiple choice comprehension questions. Several pedagogically important findings are observed. First, both seductive detail augmentation and concrete elaboration failed to promote the participants' interestingness and their comprehensibility of the texts they read. Second, the participants' language proficiency levels appear to be a potent predictor of the degree of the participants' interestingness regarding the text. Third, seductive detail segments significantly interfered with main idea comprehension of the participants, whereas it showed no detrimental effect on inferential idea comprehension. Fourth, concrete elaboration may have the potential to facilitate inferential idea comprehension. Finally, no statistically significant interaction was found between text modification techniques and language proficiency levels(high, low) for the all dependent variables(interestingness, comprehensibility, main idea & inferential idea comprehension). Findings of the study have a direct bearing on EFL high school students, their English teachers, and textbook designers for EFL high school students.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이흥수, "영어 교과서 개선 방안 연구" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 55-78, 2009

      2 최성묵, "매우 흥미있는 세부내용(seductive details)과 텍스트의 구체화(concrete elaboration)가 고등학교 2학년 학생들의 텍스트에 대한 이해와 흥미에 미치는 영향" 한국교육과정평가원 9 (9): 499-525, 2006

      3 Stevens,K.C., "he effect of background knowledge on the reading comprehension of ninth graders" 12 (12): 151-154, 1980

      4 Schraw, G., "Undoing the effect of seductive details: Integrating seductive details into the macropropositional textbase"

      5 Choi,S.M., "Two types of text-based situational interest evoking strategies: Seductive details and concrete elaboration and their effects on the 1st year high school students’ written text comprehension and interest"

      6 Oh,S., "Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification vs. elaboration" 35 (35): 69-96, 2001

      7 Dohn, N. B., "The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoophysilogy" 196-201, 2009

      8 Harp, S. F., "The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest" 89 (89): 92-102, 1997

      9 Goetz, E. T., "The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions?" 30 (30): 500-511, 1995

      10 Krashen,S., "The input hypothesis: Issues and implications" Longman 1985

      1 이흥수, "영어 교과서 개선 방안 연구" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 55-78, 2009

      2 최성묵, "매우 흥미있는 세부내용(seductive details)과 텍스트의 구체화(concrete elaboration)가 고등학교 2학년 학생들의 텍스트에 대한 이해와 흥미에 미치는 영향" 한국교육과정평가원 9 (9): 499-525, 2006

      3 Stevens,K.C., "he effect of background knowledge on the reading comprehension of ninth graders" 12 (12): 151-154, 1980

      4 Schraw, G., "Undoing the effect of seductive details: Integrating seductive details into the macropropositional textbase"

      5 Choi,S.M., "Two types of text-based situational interest evoking strategies: Seductive details and concrete elaboration and their effects on the 1st year high school students’ written text comprehension and interest"

      6 Oh,S., "Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification vs. elaboration" 35 (35): 69-96, 2001

      7 Dohn, N. B., "The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoophysilogy" 196-201, 2009

      8 Harp, S. F., "The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest" 89 (89): 92-102, 1997

      9 Goetz, E. T., "The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions?" 30 (30): 500-511, 1995

      10 Krashen,S., "The input hypothesis: Issues and implications" Longman 1985

      11 Hidi, S, "The four-phase model of interest development" 41 (41): 111-127, 2006

      12 Song,S.H., "The effect of interesting text on the reading comprehension of Korean college EFL students: A comparison of seductive details and interesting elaborations"

      13 Palmer,D., "Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson" 46 (46): 147-165, 2009

      14 Schraw, G., "Sources of situational interest" 27 (27): 1-17, 1995

      15 Schraw, G., "Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research" 13 (13): 23-52, 2001

      16 Kintsch,W., "Semantic memory: A tutorial. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 595-620, 1980

      17 Wade, S. E., "Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on strategies and recall" 28 (28): 93-114, 1993

      18 Rumelhart,D.E., "Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension" Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 38-58, 1980

      19 Beck, I., "Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility" 26 (26): 251-276, 1991

      20 Sadoski,M., "Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text" 13 (13): 263-281, 2001

      21 유제명, "Question Types of Korean EFL Textbooks in Both Sixth and Seventh National Curricula" 한국외국어교육학회 13 (13): 143-166, 2006

      22 Schraw,G., "Processing and recall differences among seductive details" 90 (90): 3-12, 1998

      23 Alexander, P. A., "Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessingg a model of domain learning" 87 (87): 559-575, 1995

      24 Schank,R.C., "Interestingness: Controlling inferences" 12 (12): 273-297, 1979

      25 Krapp, A., "Interest, learning, and development. In K. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development" Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 3-25, 1992

      26 Sadoski, M., "Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design" 85 (85): 291-304, 1993

      27 Paivio,A., "Imagery and verbal processes" New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston 1971

      28 Alexander, P. A., "How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest" 31 (31): 313-337, 1994

      29 Harp, S. F., "How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning" 90 (90): 414-434, 1998

      30 Beck, I., "Giving text a voice can improve students' understanding" 30 (30): 220-238, 1995

      31 권수옥, "Explicit Instruction Does Affect the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies for EFL Readers" 한국외국어교육학회 16 (16): 1-27, 2009

      32 Sadoski, M., "Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types" 92 (92): 85-95, 2000

      33 전은실, "Effects of text, task, and L2 reading ability on English reading strategy use" 한국외국어교육학회 13 (13): 23-50, 2006

      34 Garner, R., "Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children" 6 (6): 41-57, 1989

      35 Krapp,A., "Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations" 15 (15): 381-395, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.76 0.74 1.149 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼