1. CONTENTS<BR> (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR> Since 1990s Korea has introduced various fees for infrastructure installment. Such introduction is based on people"s consensus that urban development should...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76488238
2007
-
321
KCI등재후보
학술저널
119-133(15쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
1. CONTENTS<BR> (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR> Since 1990s Korea has introduced various fees for infrastructure installment. Such introduction is based on people"s consensus that urban development should...
1. CONTENTS<BR> (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR> Since 1990s Korea has introduced various fees for infrastructure installment. Such introduction is based on people"s consensus that urban development should proceed with adequate public facilities. However various fees for infrastructure installment in Korea still has lots of problems. This paper is to find out problems and policy recommendations. For that purpose, it first reviews related theories and overseas cases and draws frameworks to evaluate Korean institution. It examines critically Korean institution focusing on rational nexus principle.<BR> (2) RESEARCH METHOD<BR> Literature review, examination of relating laws<BR> (3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR> Implementation of various fees for infrastructure installment based on rational nexus principle enhances efficient resource allocation. However, Korean fees for infrastructure installment does not comply with the rational nexus principle. Calculation of such fees does not properly reflect marginal social costs created by urban developments. Revenue from them are often spent to even sites and infrastructure which are not related with the developments. No laws require capital improvement program. Unlike other countries, various fees for infrastructure are not integrated in Korea. Furthermore, local governments have very limited discretion in managing such fees.<BR> 2. RESEARCH RESULTS<BR> Korean fees for infrastructure needs much reform in the future. Various fees for infrastructure should be integrated on to the direction that local governments can manage with more discretion. Calculation and expenditure should be managed by rational nexus principle.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "우리나라 대도시 주변부 택지개발규제의 문제와 개선방안 연구 : 기반시설연동제를 중심으로" 2002
2 "성장관리의 이론과 실제" 동서문화사 2006
3 "사회간접자본 확충을 위한 지방정부의 재정수단 선택과 지역경제 효율성에 관한 실증 연구" 대한국토도시계획학회 39 (39): 2004
4 "부담금 운용 현황" 건설교통부 2004
5 "기반시설부담금의 실태분석 및 발전방안에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 2007
6 "기반시설부담금에 관한 법률 산정기준 마련을 위한 연구" 건설교통부 2006
7 "기반시설부담금 제도가 주택공급과 주택가격에 미치는 장기적인 영향에 관한 연구" 대한국토도시계획학회 40 (40): 2005
8 "http://www.wra.org/pdf/government/landuse/Impact_Fee_challenged.pdf"
9 "When should an impact fee be challenged?" 2007
10 "The search for efficient development patterns Florida Governor's Task Force on Urban Growth Patterns" James and Associates Van Horn-Grey Associates Inc Inc 1989
1 "우리나라 대도시 주변부 택지개발규제의 문제와 개선방안 연구 : 기반시설연동제를 중심으로" 2002
2 "성장관리의 이론과 실제" 동서문화사 2006
3 "사회간접자본 확충을 위한 지방정부의 재정수단 선택과 지역경제 효율성에 관한 실증 연구" 대한국토도시계획학회 39 (39): 2004
4 "부담금 운용 현황" 건설교통부 2004
5 "기반시설부담금의 실태분석 및 발전방안에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 2007
6 "기반시설부담금에 관한 법률 산정기준 마련을 위한 연구" 건설교통부 2006
7 "기반시설부담금 제도가 주택공급과 주택가격에 미치는 장기적인 영향에 관한 연구" 대한국토도시계획학회 40 (40): 2005
8 "http://www.wra.org/pdf/government/landuse/Impact_Fee_challenged.pdf"
9 "When should an impact fee be challenged?" 2007
10 "The search for efficient development patterns Florida Governor's Task Force on Urban Growth Patterns" James and Associates Van Horn-Grey Associates Inc Inc 1989
11 "The incidence of development impact fees and special ssessment" 51 (51): 1998
12 "The costs of alternative development patters a review of the literature" 1989
13 "Price implications of development exactions on existing housing stock" 1-12, 1989
14 "Infrastructure financing and urban development" 66 (66): 383-407, 1997
15 "Impact fee development for New Hampshire Communities" 1999
16 "Impact Assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development and Redevelopment Plan Report prepared for New jersey Office of State Planning" 1992
17 "Growth management principles and practices" American Planners Association 1995
18 "Growth controls and land values in an open city" 1990
19 "From sprawl to smart growth" American Bar Association 1999
20 "Fiscal impacts of local population growth" 1994
21 "Cost of community services snapshots A case study approach to local land use relationships" (rthampton) : 1994
22 "Cost of Service Study: Legal and Policy Study" City of Tucson 2003
23 "Community Development: Local Growth Issues-Federal Opportunity and Challenges" 2000
24 "An empirical examination of the effect of impact fees on the housing market" 1990
25 "2004년도 부담금 운용 종합 보고서" 기획예산처 2005
건축물 용도변경 추이와 사업체변화와의 관계 분석 - 서울지역을 중심으로
‘부동산학보’의 학회지를 연 3회에서 연 4회로 증간 발간키로 하였습니다.
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | |
2019-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
2018-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | (등재후보2차) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | (등재후보1차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 1.87 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.49 | 1.25 | 0.704 | 0.38 |