RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      The Role of Visual Communication in Community Participation on Developing A Climate Adaptation Plan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108571931

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background and objective: Community participation or participatory planning are two terms used interchangeably that aimto incorporate community residents' opinions in the planning process to get the maximum benefit. This approach aims togather stakeholders and engage them in a meaningful conversation to come to a decision representing the stake foreveryone involved. This study focuses on the impacts of photorealistic visualization on community participation in the U.S.
      Great Lakes Region through a 5-year long (2017-2022) climate adaptation planning project conducted in MarquetteCounty, Michigan, USA.
      Methods: Using the deliberation with analysis method of public participation, supported by visualizations, and followed bypost-project surveys, the study explores how visualizations can improve in disseminating knowledge, bridging the gap ofunderstanding among participants, enhancing engagement and delivering consistent approaches in the communitydecision-making process to come to a mutual ground of trust and common interest.
      Results: The study reveals that visualizations used at different phases of the community participation process increasedparticipants' interest and engagement during the meeting, provided them with the necessary knowledge regarding climatechange and its negative impact on health, and assisted them in decision-making and prioritizing design goals. The studyalso reveals that the visuals enhanced the project participants' engagement beyond the project's scope in future planningendeavors and increased their inclination towards climate and health adaptation planning.
      Conclusion: These findings will play a significant role in shaping the adaptive capacity in rural nonagricultural communitiesand strengthening the decision-making for similar areas dealing with climate change and its consequences.
      번역하기

      Background and objective: Community participation or participatory planning are two terms used interchangeably that aimto incorporate community residents' opinions in the planning process to get the maximum benefit. This approach aims togather stakeho...

      Background and objective: Community participation or participatory planning are two terms used interchangeably that aimto incorporate community residents' opinions in the planning process to get the maximum benefit. This approach aims togather stakeholders and engage them in a meaningful conversation to come to a decision representing the stake foreveryone involved. This study focuses on the impacts of photorealistic visualization on community participation in the U.S.
      Great Lakes Region through a 5-year long (2017-2022) climate adaptation planning project conducted in MarquetteCounty, Michigan, USA.
      Methods: Using the deliberation with analysis method of public participation, supported by visualizations, and followed bypost-project surveys, the study explores how visualizations can improve in disseminating knowledge, bridging the gap ofunderstanding among participants, enhancing engagement and delivering consistent approaches in the communitydecision-making process to come to a mutual ground of trust and common interest.
      Results: The study reveals that visualizations used at different phases of the community participation process increasedparticipants' interest and engagement during the meeting, provided them with the necessary knowledge regarding climatechange and its negative impact on health, and assisted them in decision-making and prioritizing design goals. The studyalso reveals that the visuals enhanced the project participants' engagement beyond the project's scope in future planningendeavors and increased their inclination towards climate and health adaptation planning.
      Conclusion: These findings will play a significant role in shaping the adaptive capacity in rural nonagricultural communitiesand strengthening the decision-making for similar areas dealing with climate change and its consequences.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 DeCock-Caspell, M., "Visualizations as a tool to increase community engagement in climate change adaptation decision-making" 6 (6): 240-251, 2021

      2 Al-Kodmany, K, "Visualization tools and methods for participatory planning and design" 8 (8): 1-37, 2001

      3 Al-Kodmany, K, "Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design : Process, implementation, and evaluation" 45 (45): 37-45, 1999

      4 Maginn, P. J, "Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration : The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography" 7 (7): 25-43, 2007

      5 Mapita, "Three types of community engagement-maptionnaire. maptionnaire | community engagement platform"

      6 Swart, R., "The problem of the future : Sustainability science and scenario analysis" 14 : 137-146, 2004

      7 Machler, L., "The evolution of communicative planning theory"

      8 Clark, W. C., "Sustainability science : The emerging research program" 100 (100): 8059-8061, 2003

      9 Arnold, J. L., "Rural climate resilience through builtenvironment interventions : Modified deliberation with analysis as a tool to address barriers to adaptive capacity. Regional Studies" 8 (8): 1-24, 2021

      10 Lane, M. B, "Public participation in planning : An intellectual history" 36 (36): 283-299, 2005

      1 DeCock-Caspell, M., "Visualizations as a tool to increase community engagement in climate change adaptation decision-making" 6 (6): 240-251, 2021

      2 Al-Kodmany, K, "Visualization tools and methods for participatory planning and design" 8 (8): 1-37, 2001

      3 Al-Kodmany, K, "Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design : Process, implementation, and evaluation" 45 (45): 37-45, 1999

      4 Maginn, P. J, "Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration : The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography" 7 (7): 25-43, 2007

      5 Mapita, "Three types of community engagement-maptionnaire. maptionnaire | community engagement platform"

      6 Swart, R., "The problem of the future : Sustainability science and scenario analysis" 14 : 137-146, 2004

      7 Machler, L., "The evolution of communicative planning theory"

      8 Clark, W. C., "Sustainability science : The emerging research program" 100 (100): 8059-8061, 2003

      9 Arnold, J. L., "Rural climate resilience through builtenvironment interventions : Modified deliberation with analysis as a tool to address barriers to adaptive capacity. Regional Studies" 8 (8): 1-24, 2021

      10 Lane, M. B, "Public participation in planning : An intellectual history" 36 (36): 283-299, 2005

      11 Josephine P. Reynolds, "Public Participation in Planning" Liverpool University Press 40 (40): 131-, 1969

      12 Innes, J. E., "Planning with complexity : An Introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy" Routledge 2010

      13 Healey, P, "Planning through debate : The communicative turn in planning theory" 63 (63): 143-162, 1992

      14 Innes, J. E, "Planning theory's emerging paradigm : Communicative action and interactive practice" 14 (14): 183-189, 1995

      15 Törnroth, S., "Participatory utopian sketching : A methodological framework for collaborative citizen(re)imagination of urban spatial futures" 139 : 102938-, 2022

      16 GLISA, "National Climate Assessment"

      17 Innes, J. E, "Information in communicative planning" 64 (64): 52-63, 1998

      18 Mattila, H, "Habermas revisited : Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory" 141 : 100431-, 2020

      19 GLISA, "Great Lakes Regional Climate Change Maps"

      20 Fisher, R., "Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving" Negotiating agreement without giving in

      21 Vasseur, L., "Feeding the social animal: How to engage anadians in climate change mitigation" 166-171, 2015

      22 Shu Yang ; 김준현 ; Wonmin Sohn ; Zeenat Kotval-K, "Developing A Revitalization Planning and Design Guideline for Enhancing Land Use Performance of a Shrinking City" 인간식물환경학회 23 (23): 387-398, 2020

      23 A. Meroni., "Creative communities: People inventing sustainable ways of living (First) Polidesign"

      24 Crawford, P., "Creating climate change adaptation plans for rural coastal communities using deliberation with analysis as public participation for social learning" 89 (89): 283-304, 2018

      25 "CONUS Climate Divisions. Geographical Reference Maps. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)"

      26 Arnstein, S. R, "A ladder of citizen participation" 35 (35): 216-224, 1969

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼