폭설로 인한 고속도로의 정체와 손해배상책임에 관한 연구 － 판례평석 : 대법원 2008. 3. 13. 선고 2007다29287,29294 판결 － = A Study on Responsibility about the traffic jam of the express highway caused by the heavy snowfall

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In case of the traffic jam of the express highway which is caused by with heavy snowfall, to admit responsibility for the highway administrator, related to public facilities and manufactured products, was sentenced a judgment from Supreme Court(Mar. 13. 2008). This case was a meaningful decision that the court recognized the express highway administrator's responsibility in traffic jam on the highway.
The Supreme Court said the express highway administrator have an obliation to quickly remove heavy snow on the express highway or to impose restrictions on car entering the express highway in order to maintain the basic features of the road or quickly recover that road. And then If he should violate these obligations of management, the express highway administrator were liable for damage resulting from loss of all those who are isolated on the express highway.
In the Civil Law, the fault liability for tort and the no-fault liability for negligence in the administration of manufactured products is specified. And then It is provided that a liability for compensation born by the State should be fault liability, in the same breath a liability for public facilities should be no-fault liability in the State Compensation Act. In the meantime a series of court rulings have determined that the administrator is only responsibility for a fault in management of public facilities and manufactured products by violation on obligations of safety control. This judicial precedents has been criticized continuosly.
This means that from now on there would be some room to receive compensation for losses resulted from flaws in maintenance or management in case of severe traffic jam of express highway which is caused by heavy snowfall, as well as permission entry of excessive number of vehicles on holidays or weekends.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2008

2 유지태, "행정법신론" 박영사 2006

3 박균성, "행정법론(상)" 박영사 2008

4 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2008

5 김남진, "행정법Ⅰ" 법문사 1997

6 박윤흔, "최신행정법강의(상)" 박영사 1996

7 김상용, "채권각론" 법문사 2003

8 김증한, "채권각론" 박영사 2006

9 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 2003

10 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2005

11 박? 신, "집중호우로 인한 도로관리상의 하자" 1999

12 석종현, "일반행정법(상)" 삼영사 1993

13 오시영, "민법강의" 학현사 2006

14 박? 신, "미국에서의 도로 설치?관리에 따른 배상책임에 관한 연구" 30 (30): 2002

15 이준희, "도로의 설치상의 하자로 인한 관리청의 손해배상책임" 2004

16 안철상, "도로의 설치?관리의 하자로 인한 손해배상책임" 부산판례연구회편 1994

17 김한용, "도로의 설치 보존의 하자로 인한 손해배상책임" 2001

18 정광정, "도로 소음공해와 도로하자 책임에 관한 연구" 17 : 2004

19 김명길, "국가배상법의 영조물책임의 배분을 위한 시론" 47 (47): 2007

20 송희성, "국가배상법상 몇가지 문제점" 4 (4): 2002

21 김성필, "공작물책임의 입법론적 검토" 5 (5): 2005

22 이인제, "공작물책임에 있어서의 하자" 사법행정 1993

23 박신외, "고속도로 설치?관리상의 하자와 책임에 관한 연구" 한국도로공사 2001