RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    용기의 정당화와 그 교육 가능성 = The Justification and Possibilities of Education on Courage

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19655378

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this thesis is to clarify the concept of `courage` or `couageous action`, to justify values of it, and to discuss on the possibilites of rearing of it in education. Conclusions are as following. First, researcher investigated the meaning of courage including some dictionarys(Concise Oxford Dictionary and Merriam-Webster Dictionary, as example). And I introduced classical meanings in works of Greek and mediaeval philosophers. Though efforts of above philosophers distributed on understanding of descriptive meanings of courage, it only explained one side of many meanings of courage. And so, I tried to analyse modern meanings of it. At the same time, researcher criticized some views of modern philosophers discussed on the courage with analytical methods. To call a certain action `couragous`, it would be demands to some conditions: situation with dangers and pains, good aim(end) and intention, and rational or desirable methods to solve dangerous situation. Secondly, tried by two ethical theories teleological and deontological theories. Utilitarians justfied couragous action in utility or consequences of action. They not concernd with good motive and intention with desirable results. They failed to notice the possibilities of which courageous action would perform by a certain duty in some situation. The deontological ethicians as Kant emphasized duty of action, but they failed to notice of which many acts of courage are beyond duty(supererogatory). Though a action was not justified by consequences and duties, we say not that it has not a intrinsic values, at the same time need not pursuit it. Thirdly, reseacher discussed on possiblities of rearing of courageous action in education. One of aims in education is to bring up people to couragous. Human qualities in courageous action would be acquired a posteriori. Adults or school teachers ought to explain why needs courageous action in our practical or moral life. And they must act on as model of couragous people. Moreover, they ought to guide young peoples to think rationally, to choose more desirable method to solve the dangerous situation, to act on some rational or moral principles.
    번역하기

    The aim of this thesis is to clarify the concept of `courage` or `couageous action`, to justify values of it, and to discuss on the possibilites of rearing of it in education. Conclusions are as following. First, researcher investigated the meaning o...

    The aim of this thesis is to clarify the concept of `courage` or `couageous action`, to justify values of it, and to discuss on the possibilites of rearing of it in education. Conclusions are as following. First, researcher investigated the meaning of courage including some dictionarys(Concise Oxford Dictionary and Merriam-Webster Dictionary, as example). And I introduced classical meanings in works of Greek and mediaeval philosophers. Though efforts of above philosophers distributed on understanding of descriptive meanings of courage, it only explained one side of many meanings of courage. And so, I tried to analyse modern meanings of it. At the same time, researcher criticized some views of modern philosophers discussed on the courage with analytical methods. To call a certain action `couragous`, it would be demands to some conditions: situation with dangers and pains, good aim(end) and intention, and rational or desirable methods to solve dangerous situation. Secondly, tried by two ethical theories teleological and deontological theories. Utilitarians justfied couragous action in utility or consequences of action. They not concernd with good motive and intention with desirable results. They failed to notice the possibilities of which courageous action would perform by a certain duty in some situation. The deontological ethicians as Kant emphasized duty of action, but they failed to notice of which many acts of courage are beyond duty(supererogatory). Though a action was not justified by consequences and duties, we say not that it has not a intrinsic values, at the same time need not pursuit it. Thirdly, reseacher discussed on possiblities of rearing of courageous action in education. One of aims in education is to bring up people to couragous. Human qualities in courageous action would be acquired a posteriori. Adults or school teachers ought to explain why needs courageous action in our practical or moral life. And they must act on as model of couragous people. Moreover, they ought to guide young peoples to think rationally, to choose more desirable method to solve the dangerous situation, to act on some rational or moral principles.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼