링크행위의 저작권 침해 가능성- 한국 대법원 2017다222757 판결과의 비교법연구 - = The Possibility of Copyright Infringement against Linking - A Comparative Law Study with Korean Supreme Court 2017Na222757 Decision -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper is a comparative law study with the Korea Supreme Court 2017Na222757 Decision(It was called ‘the Subject's judgment’ in the following) on the discussion of EU, US and Japan about Linking. In this paper, I try to interpret the law that linking can be infringement of copyright (especially, Right of public transmission) of Korean copyright law and according to this try, assert that the Subject's judgment fall under a copyright infringement case.
EU has broadly interpreted the meaning of 'Communication to the Public' of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC through the CJEU Decisions and that linking can be considered as a direct infringement by satisfied some requirements, the recognition of results about the use of illegally open works and the indispensability of linking interventions, additionally commercial purposes by obligated to investigate whether the linked works is illegal or not. US also acknowledges the indirect infringement of copyright in common law on linking with subjective perception that it is used for copyright infringement. on the other hand, Japan, unlike EU, enumerate by limited the meaning of 'Making transmittable' under the Copyright Act and It is common for interpretation that deny direct infringement of linking. but recently, there is active discussion concerning to be direct infringement by the theory of normative infringement Subject and by indirect infringement against Leech site under certain requirements, the subjective perception of illegally open works.
Unlike the flow of foreign discussion like this, the Subject's judgment ruled denied copyright infringement against embedded linking to the illegally opened works for commercial purposes. I think that this ruling can not prevent the circulation of illegally open works on the Internet or an effective protection of the author. Considering that the Korean Copyright Law does not have any restrictions like Japanese Law, it is possible to find a solution under the present law by widely interpreted the concept of 'Communication to the Public' like EU or by presenting certain requirements by the Supreme Court with referring to foreign discussions.
In accordance with the international trend of copyright protection, Korea also needs to interpret linking as copyright infringement. This paper is expected to be a reference in reviewing the interpretation of Korean law.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Schmid, 10 (10): 83-, 2015

2 이해원, "하이퍼링크와 저작권 침해 문제의 재고찰 : ‘이용에 제공하는 것’의 해석론을 중심으로" 대한변호사협회 (463) : 98-117, 2017

3 김창화, "저작권의 침해에 대한 간접책임제도의 정립 - 미국법상 간접책임과의 비교를 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 39 (39): 393-423, 2015

4 박성호, "저작권법" 박영사 2017

5 이해완, "저작권법" 박영사 2012

6 오승종, "저작권법" 박영사 2016

7 전성태, "일본에서의 저작권 간접침해행위의 규제 - 판례·학설 및 입법적 동향을 중심으로 -" 한국지식재산연구원 6 (6): 145-179, 2011

8 이대희, "인터넷상에서의 저작물 제공과 전송" 한국저작권위원회 27 (27): 113-144, 2014

9 박준석, "인터넷상 정보 유통에 대한 새로운 저작권 규율 방향 모색" 집문당 2015

10 박준석, "인터넷 링크행위자는 이제 정범은 물론 방조범조차 아닌 것인가? -대법원 2012도13748 판결의 문제점과저작권 형사범죄 처벌의 논리-" 한국지식재산학회 (48) : 73-162, 2015

11 이해완, "인터넷 링크와 저작권 침해 책임" 법학연구원 27 (27): 229-269, 2015

12 박준석, "민사판례연구 제33집-하" 박영사 2011

13 김현철, "링크제공자의 저작권법상 책임에 관한 소고" 58 : 2002

14 남희섭, "링크와 저작권" 한국인터넷기업협회 2016

15 김경숙, "링크사이트의 저작권 침해 방조책임" 한국저작권위원회 29 (29): 5-40, 2016

16 作花文雄, "詳解 著作権法" ぎょうせい 2010

17 小倉秀夫, "著作権法コンメンタール" LexisNexis 2013

18 中山信弘, "著作権法" 有斐閣 2014

19 岡村久道, "著作権法" 民事法研究会 2014

20 茶園成樹, "著作権法" 有斐閣 2016

21 田村義之, "著作権概説" 有斐閣 2001

22 小泉直樹, "良いリンク悪いリンク"

23 村義之, "知的財産法" 有斐閣 2010

24 横山久芳, "現代知的財産法講座Ⅲ－知的財産法の国際的交錯-" 日本評論社 2012

25 茶園成樹, "牧野利秋先生喜寿記念, 知的財産権-法理と提言-" 青林書院 2012

26 知的財産戦略本部, "次世代知財システム検討委員会報告書-デジタル․ネットワーク化に対する次世代知財システム構築に向けて-" 2016

27 田村義之, "検索サイトをめぐる著作権法上の諸問題(1)-寄与侵害, 間接侵害, フェアユ-ス, 引用等-" (16) : 2007

28 茶園成樹, "年報知的財産法2013年" 日本評論社 2013

29 角田政芳, "土肥一史先生古希記念論文集, 知的財産法のモルゲンロード" 中央経済社 2017

30 作花文雄, "リンキングに関する著作権問題の動向(CJEUにおける裁判例の形成と課題)-リンキング許容性の下における著作物利用行為性の生ずる｢Context｣の検証-" 55 (55): 2016

31 マズイエ, "ベルヌ条約逐条解説"

32 佐藤恵太, "インターネット利用に特有の諸技術と知的財産法" (1182) : 2000

33 福井健策, "インターネットビジネスの著作権とルール" 著作権情報センター 2014

34 吉田和彦, "インターネットにおけるリンク張りと利用可能化" 61 (61): 2016

35 吉田和彦, "インターネットにおけるリンク張りと利用可能化" 61 (61): 2016

36 高橋和之他, "インターネットと法" 有斐閣 2010

37 井奈波明子, "[欧州]｢リーチサイト｣問題" 67 (67): 2017

38 Leistner, "Urheberrecht an der Schnittstelle zwischen Unionsrecht und nationalem Recht"

39 Makeen, "The Controversy of Simultaneous Cable Retransmission to Hotel Rooms Under International and European Copyright Laws" 57 : 59-, 2010

40 奥邨弘司, "Stiching Brein事件(またはFilmsprler事件)EU司法裁判所先決判決について" 57 (57): 2017

41 Walter, "MR-Int 2014"

42 Arezzo, "Hyperlinks and Making Available Right in the European Union-What Future for the Internet after Svensson?-" 524-, 2014

43 Dietrich, "GRUR-Int 2014"

44 Grünberger, "Bedarf es einer Harmonisierung der Verwertungsrechte und Schranken?" 273-, 2015

45 Headdon, "An epilogue to Svensson-the same old new public and the worms that didn't turn-" 9 (9): 662-, 2014