RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      中國의 WTO加入과 特許法 改正에 관한 考察

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60201543

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Multilateral trading system of the WTO has undoubtedly improved international trade by encouraging further globalization, and, as a result, emphasis on protection of intellectual property rights has become an inevitable necessity. WTO Agreement on Tra...

      Multilateral trading system of the WTO has undoubtedly improved international trade by encouraging further globalization, and, as a result, emphasis on protection of intellectual property rights has become an inevitable necessity. WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) is an attempt to narrow the gaps among protection laws around the globe, and, at last, establishes a set of international standards, by which all nations must abide. China who has acquired the WTO membership in December 2001, is trying to accommodate such rules. The present article analyzes the efforts of China in its pursuit of protection of intellectual property rights in international arena. Chinese patent law was largely underdeveloped during decades of communist regime. It was not until with the establishment of Chinese Intellectual Property Rights Office in 1980 and the coming into force of the patent law in 1394 that the significance of IPRs protection was recognized China made amendments to its patent law in 1992 and in 2000 to meet prerequisite conditions to GATT and WTO respectively. The second amendment reflects the effort to comply with WTO/TRIPs rules. For example, under previous Chinese patent law, offering patent products for sale was not an illegal act of infringing the patent right however, the current law explicitly states that such an act constitutes an infringement as is the case under Article 29 of the TRIPs It should be noted that the TRIPs is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the protection of IPRs. The TRIPs, while seeking harmonization of intellectual property rights laws of individual nations, does not eliminate altogether the discrepancies among national laws. In addition, its provisions often provide inconsistent interpretation and enforcement measures. Therefore, Korea must observe the transition of the Chinese enforcement of the patent law, especially with regard to its effects on Korean exports of patented products to China. Studies of specific cases on the application of Chinese patent law must be pursued to prevent trade disputes with China over intellectual property rights in the future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 중국특허법의 변천
      • 1. 1984년 특허법 제정 이전 : 발명자증 시대
      • 2. 1984년 특허법 제정 : 사회주의체제와의 공존
      • Ⅲ. WTO/GATT 가입을 위한 중국특허법의 개정
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 중국특허법의 변천
      • 1. 1984년 특허법 제정 이전 : 발명자증 시대
      • 2. 1984년 특허법 제정 : 사회주의체제와의 공존
      • Ⅲ. WTO/GATT 가입을 위한 중국특허법의 개정
      • 1. GATT가입을 위한 제1차 특허법 개정
      • 2. WTO가입을 위한 제2차 특허법 개정
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼