RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고급주택 관련 취득세 중과세 제도의 문제점과 개선방안 = Issues and Improvement Measures for the Heavy Taxation System on Acquisition Tax for Luxury Housing

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109132470

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Acquisition tax is payable upon the acquisition of certain assets, such as real estate or vehicles. For assets deemed luxury properties―such as golf courses, high-end entertainment venues, luxury housing, and luxury ships―an additional acquisition tax rate of 8% is imposed, distinguishing them from ordinary real estate.
      Specifically, for luxury housing, a system of heavy taxation at 7.5 times the general acquisition tax rate was established in 1975. For nearly 50 years, luxury housing and other luxury properties have been subject to a fivefold increase in acquisition tax, intended to discourage their acquisition. However, this increased taxation has been largely ineffective in deterring the acquisition of luxury properties and has primarily resulted in disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities.
      Therefore, it is recommended that the heavy taxation system for luxury housing be abolished. The heavy taxation on luxury housing is applied based not only on the property's value but also on its area, leading to continuous disputes between taxpayers and local governments, the taxing authorities, over area calculations.
      Particularly contentious is whether the areas of parking lots and elevator halls should be included in the total area calculation, which determines if a property qualifies as luxury housing. Tax authorities argue that these areas should be included in the housing area, while taxpayers contend they should be excluded.
      From a legislative standpoint, it is reasonable to exclude parking lot areas from the housing area. Similarly, elevator hall areas should be excluded from the housing area unless there are exceptional circumstances.
      번역하기

      Acquisition tax is payable upon the acquisition of certain assets, such as real estate or vehicles. For assets deemed luxury properties―such as golf courses, high-end entertainment venues, luxury housing, and luxury ships―an additional acquisition...

      Acquisition tax is payable upon the acquisition of certain assets, such as real estate or vehicles. For assets deemed luxury properties―such as golf courses, high-end entertainment venues, luxury housing, and luxury ships―an additional acquisition tax rate of 8% is imposed, distinguishing them from ordinary real estate.
      Specifically, for luxury housing, a system of heavy taxation at 7.5 times the general acquisition tax rate was established in 1975. For nearly 50 years, luxury housing and other luxury properties have been subject to a fivefold increase in acquisition tax, intended to discourage their acquisition. However, this increased taxation has been largely ineffective in deterring the acquisition of luxury properties and has primarily resulted in disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities.
      Therefore, it is recommended that the heavy taxation system for luxury housing be abolished. The heavy taxation on luxury housing is applied based not only on the property's value but also on its area, leading to continuous disputes between taxpayers and local governments, the taxing authorities, over area calculations.
      Particularly contentious is whether the areas of parking lots and elevator halls should be included in the total area calculation, which determines if a property qualifies as luxury housing. Tax authorities argue that these areas should be included in the housing area, while taxpayers contend they should be excluded.
      From a legislative standpoint, it is reasonable to exclude parking lot areas from the housing area. Similarly, elevator hall areas should be excluded from the housing area unless there are exceptional circumstances.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼