特許權 間接侵害에 관한 硏究 = (A) Study on Indirect-Infringement of Patent Rights

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The scope of this thesis is restricted to the observations of legislative precedents, doctrines and cases relating to an indirect infringement of a patent right in 1,fading countries , the understanding and collect ive analysis of the grounds for the precedents cases about the disputes of indirect infringement of patent right , which have actually occurred under Article 127 (Acts Deemed to be Infringement) of the Korean Patent Laws, the searching for absurdity in recognition of the protection scope and the suggestion of reform measures.
The study of this thesis is to compare the legislative precedents of the leading countries with those of our country and to compare, analyze and summarize the grounds for theories and legislative precedents through the related theses, the publications and the cases, which has been publicized in foreign countries and our country with respect to the indirect infringement of patent right.
The content and the format method of this thesis are as follows.
In chapter 2, prior to referring to a patent infringement, in order to understand the essence of patent right, the significance, character and effects of patent right as well as the interpretation of the scope of the claims and the related principles are described.
In chapter 3, in order to understand the concept of a patent infringement, the significance of the patent infringement and a direct and an indirect infringements as a kind of the patent infringement are roughly described.
In chapter 4, the provisions on an indirect infringement of patent right and its purpose are observed compared with foreign legislative precedents. Further the requirements for indirect infringement, the time of basis for determining an patent infringement and its proof responsibility are described and then the cases of foreign countries and our country are analyzed.
In chapter 5, the civil and criminal remedies for indirect infringement of patent right are described.
In chapter 6, problems resulted from indirect infringement are suggested.
At last, in chapter 7, subject matters are collectively analyzed and important relevant contents are summarized, suggest ing one model for determining an indirect infringement of a patent right. In addition, a reform measure based on legislative theory is also suggested.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 2
• 第2章 特許權의 基本理論 = 4
• 第1節 槪要 = 4
• 第2節 特許權의 本質에 관한 學說 = 7
• Ⅰ. 人格權說 = 7
• Ⅱ. 所有權說 = 7
• Ⅲ. 無體財産權說 = 8
• Ⅳ. 檢討 = 9
• 第3節 特許權의 性質 = 10
• Ⅰ. 私權的 性質 = 10
• Ⅱ. 專用權的 性質 = 10
• Ⅲ. 排他權的 性質 = 11
• Ⅳ. 財産權的 性質 = 11
• Ⅴ. 公益的 性質 = 12
• 第4節 特許權의 效力 = 13
• Ⅰ. 特許權의 積極的 效力 = 13
• Ⅱ. 特許權의 消極的 效力 = 14
• 第5節 特許權의 權利範圍 解釋 = 15
• Ⅰ. 特許請求範圍의 槪念 = 16
• Ⅱ. 權利範圍 解釋 方式 = 18
• Ⅲ. 權利範圍 解釋의 諸原則 = 22
• 第3章 特許侵害의 槪觀 = 39
• 第1節 特許侵害의 意義 = 39
• 第2節 特許侵害의 類型 = 39
• 第4章 特許權 間接侵害 = 45
• 第1節 間接侵害의 意義 및 制度的 趣旨 = 45
• Ⅰ. 意義 = 45
• Ⅱ. 間接侵害의 制度的 趣旨 = 46
• 第2節 間接侵害에 관한 立法例 = 50
• Ⅰ. 美國 = 50
• Ⅱ. 日本 = 61
• Ⅲ. 獨逸 = 68
• Ⅳ. 韓國 = 72
• 第3節 間接侵害의 成立要件 = 88
• Ⅰ. 特許發明의 實施에만 使用되는 物件 = 88
• Ⅱ. 他 用途 存在의 判斷時期 = 89
• Ⅲ. 立證責任 = 90
• Ⅳ. 業으로서의 實施 = 91
• Ⅴ. 侵害의 認識 = 91
• Ⅳ. 直接侵害의 存在 = 92
• 第5章 間接侵害에 대한 救濟 = 94
• 第1節 民事的 救濟 = 94
• 第2節 刑事的 救濟 = 98
• 第6章 間接侵害와 關聯된 間題 = 101
• Ⅰ. 正當實施權者의 下都給 行爲에 따른 關聯 問題 = 101
• Ⅱ. 過失推定規定 適用與否의 問題 = 101
• Ⅲ. 國外에서의 特許發明 實施 및 權利存績期間 滿了 後의 特許發明 實施를 위한 豫備行爲에 대한 間接 侵害 適用 問題 = 103
• Ⅳ. 間接侵害 判斷時의 均等論 適用 間題 = 105
• Ⅴ. 間接侵害의 保護客體와 他 特許發明과의 利用 抵觸 關係 認定할 것 인지의 問題 = 105
• Ⅵ. 損害額算定 國難의 問題 = 106
• Ⅶ. 間接侵害 該當範圍에 관한 實施契約의 有效性 問題 = 107
• Ⅷ. 權利消盡理論 適用과의 問題 = 108
• Ⅸ. 間接侵害에 의한 制裁와 獨占禁止法과의 問題 = 109
• 第7章 結論 = 111
• 參考文獻 = 116
• ABSTRACT = 122