RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Who Are the People Willing to Pay for Physician Home Visits?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106865871

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Since the recently announced Community Care Policy, there has been an opinion that Korea needs to establish an alternative medical model such as physician home visits. This study aimed to assess the need and willingness to pay (WTP) for physician home visits among the community-dwelling Korean older population and to determine the most important factors that influence older adults to decide to use a physician home visit service.
      Methods: A total of 797 people aged 60 years or older who were randomly selected from a nationwide dataset using a multi-stage stratified sampling method answered a questionnaire on the need and WTP for physician home visits.
      Results: A total of 39.3% of participants reported that they would like a physician home visit when they need help. Among older adults who needed physician home visits (n = 313), the WTP amount for physician home visits was 21,982 ± 17,546 KRW. Logit and Tobit regression analyses showed that the higher valuated need and WTP for physician home visits was associated with a lower level of physical/psychosocial functioning measured by EuroQol-five dimensions score (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.27; P = 0.035) and a higher level of satisfaction when using community-based services such as public health centers (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02–1.72; P = 0.034), social welfare centers and Gyeong-ro-dang (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.04–2.50; P = 0.033; β = 8.39; standard error, 3.63; P = 0.021).
      Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the decision to pay for a physician home visit service is based upon the complex interactions among an individual's physical and psychosocial functioning, personal experiences of service utilization, and demographic factors. The value for physician home visits should be qualified based on the empirical data of WTP, which comes from a consumer-centered perspective.
      번역하기

      Background: Since the recently announced Community Care Policy, there has been an opinion that Korea needs to establish an alternative medical model such as physician home visits. This study aimed to assess the need and willingness to pay (WTP) for ph...

      Background: Since the recently announced Community Care Policy, there has been an opinion that Korea needs to establish an alternative medical model such as physician home visits. This study aimed to assess the need and willingness to pay (WTP) for physician home visits among the community-dwelling Korean older population and to determine the most important factors that influence older adults to decide to use a physician home visit service.
      Methods: A total of 797 people aged 60 years or older who were randomly selected from a nationwide dataset using a multi-stage stratified sampling method answered a questionnaire on the need and WTP for physician home visits.
      Results: A total of 39.3% of participants reported that they would like a physician home visit when they need help. Among older adults who needed physician home visits (n = 313), the WTP amount for physician home visits was 21,982 ± 17,546 KRW. Logit and Tobit regression analyses showed that the higher valuated need and WTP for physician home visits was associated with a lower level of physical/psychosocial functioning measured by EuroQol-five dimensions score (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.27; P = 0.035) and a higher level of satisfaction when using community-based services such as public health centers (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02–1.72; P = 0.034), social welfare centers and Gyeong-ro-dang (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.04–2.50; P = 0.033; β = 8.39; standard error, 3.63; P = 0.021).
      Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the decision to pay for a physician home visit service is based upon the complex interactions among an individual's physical and psychosocial functioning, personal experiences of service utilization, and demographic factors. The value for physician home visits should be qualified based on the empirical data of WTP, which comes from a consumer-centered perspective.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이건세, "커뮤니티케어를 어떻게 볼 것인가?" 대한의사협회 61 (61): 586-589, 2018

      2 박재산, "보건소 이용자가 인지하는 보건의료서비스 질, 만족도, 재이용의사 및 타인권유 의향간의 인과관계분석" 한국보건행정학회 15 (15): 60-78, 2005

      3 Stuck A, "Whom do preventive home visits help" 56 (56): 561-563, 2008

      4 Chang-O Kim, "Time to Conduct Community-Oriented Researches in Geriatrics" 대한노인병학회 22 (22): 109-110, 2018

      5 Epstein RM, "The values and value of patient-centered care" 9 (9): 100-103, 2011

      6 Arend J, "The patient-centered medical home : history, components, and review of the evidence" 79 (79): 433-450, 2012

      7 Vargo SL, "The four service marketing myths : remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model" 6 (6): 324-335, 2004

      8 Kim CO, "Preventive effect of protein-energy supplementation on the functional decline of frail older adults with low socioeconomic status : a community-based randomized controlled study" 68 (68): 309-316, 2013

      9 Fletcher AE, "Population-based multidimensional assessment of older people in UK general practice : a cluster-randomised factorial trial" 364 (364): 1667-1677, 2004

      10 Lee JK, "Place of death and associated gender difference in Korea 2006-2014 : Evidence from exit interviews of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing" 78 (78): 196-202, 2018

      1 이건세, "커뮤니티케어를 어떻게 볼 것인가?" 대한의사협회 61 (61): 586-589, 2018

      2 박재산, "보건소 이용자가 인지하는 보건의료서비스 질, 만족도, 재이용의사 및 타인권유 의향간의 인과관계분석" 한국보건행정학회 15 (15): 60-78, 2005

      3 Stuck A, "Whom do preventive home visits help" 56 (56): 561-563, 2008

      4 Chang-O Kim, "Time to Conduct Community-Oriented Researches in Geriatrics" 대한노인병학회 22 (22): 109-110, 2018

      5 Epstein RM, "The values and value of patient-centered care" 9 (9): 100-103, 2011

      6 Arend J, "The patient-centered medical home : history, components, and review of the evidence" 79 (79): 433-450, 2012

      7 Vargo SL, "The four service marketing myths : remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model" 6 (6): 324-335, 2004

      8 Kim CO, "Preventive effect of protein-energy supplementation on the functional decline of frail older adults with low socioeconomic status : a community-based randomized controlled study" 68 (68): 309-316, 2013

      9 Fletcher AE, "Population-based multidimensional assessment of older people in UK general practice : a cluster-randomised factorial trial" 364 (364): 1667-1677, 2004

      10 Lee JK, "Place of death and associated gender difference in Korea 2006-2014 : Evidence from exit interviews of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing" 78 (78): 196-202, 2018

      11 Rich EC, "Organizing care for complex patients in the patient-centered medical home" 10 (10): 60-62, 2012

      12 Huss A, "Multidimensional preventive home visit programs for community-dwelling older adults : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 63 (63): 298-307, 2008

      13 Drummond MF, "Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes" Oxford University Press 2015

      14 Totten AM, "Home-based Primary Care Interventions" Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2016

      15 김창오, "Home-Based Primary Care for Homebound Older Adults: Literature Review" 대한노인병학회 22 (22): 62-72, 2018

      16 Stuck AE, "Home visits to prevent nursing home admission and functional decline in elderly people : systematic review and meta-regression analysis" 287 (287): 1022-1028, 2002

      17 Tobin J, "Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables" 26 (26): 24-36, 1958

      18 Bouman A, "Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status : a systematic review" 8 (8): 74-, 2008

      19 Szanton SL, "Effect of a biobehavioral environmental approach on disability among low-income older adults : a randomized clinical trial" 179 (179): 204-211, 2019

      20 Yoon JL, "Development of Post-acute Transitional Care System for Frail Older Persons" Hallym University 2017

      21 Naylor MD, "Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders : a randomized clinical trial" 281 (281): 613-620, 1999

      22 Reuben DB, "Better ways to care for older persons: is anybody listening?" 57 (57): 2348-2349, 2009

      23 Phelan EA, "Activities of daily living function and disability in older adults in a randomized trial of the health enhancement program" 59 (59): 838-843, 2004

      24 Stuck AE, "A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community" 333 (333): 1184-1189, 1995

      25 Gill TM, "A prehabilitation program for physically frail community-living older persons" 84 (84): 394-404, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼