Considering the increasing competition on the international tourism market and the growing importance of internet platforms to share evaluations of a place, assessing the destination image has become an important topic of research for both academics a...
Considering the increasing competition on the international tourism market and the growing importance of internet platforms to share evaluations of a place, assessing the destination image has become an important topic of research for both academics and practitioners. Focusing on the Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul, South Korea, this thesis compares the construction of the perceived and projected destination image on the internet, discusses reasons for differences and, based on the findings, offers suggestions for adjustments to the projected destination image and measures to reduce negative references in the perceived destination image.
The analysis was divided into three steps and compares cognitive, affective, and conative components of the destination image, as well as the attributes that constitute them. First, the construction of the perceived destination image was examined by analyzing TripAdvisor reviews from October 2016. Second, the construction of the projected destination image was examined by analyzing relevant entries from January 2015 to April 2017 of the visitkorea website operated by the Korea Tourism Organization. Third, both destination images were compared on the component level in general, and the attribute level in detail. It was found, that the construction of the destination image on the component level was similar as in both cases, the cognitive component was of substantial significance, although the result may have been influenced by the type of online platforms analyzed. On the attribute level, six main incongruences were identified, the reason for which can be found in the interpretation of the reality of the palace by visitors that the Korea Tourism Organization failed to address. A closer cooperation with the Palace management is suggested in order to address the incongruences between the perceived and projected destination image.
The study results are limited in its generalizability based on the small sample size and small selection of online platforms. Further research should include a larger sample size as well as a greater variety in types of online platforms in case of the perceived and more stakeholders in case of the projected destination image. Furthermore, the influence the type of platform has on the image construction should be evaluated, and a comparison of the destination image online and offline will provide a more comprehensive understanding of how the destination image is constructed.