RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Propofol을 이용한 후두마스크 삽입 시 Remifentanil의 효과 = The Effects of Remifentanil on the LMA Insertion with the Administration of Propofol

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104356529

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) can be inserted without
      muscle relaxant in patients who have received propofol. Remifentanil
      that is recently used opioid effectively attenuates the hemodynamic
      responses to laryngoscopy. This study was to investigate
      the effects of remifentanil on the quality and hemodynamic response
      of LMA insertion after intravenous propofol induction without muscle
      relaxant.
      Methods: Forty patients (ASA I or II, 20-65 years) were randomly
      allocated to control and remifentanil group. Control group received
      propofol 4μg/ml alone, remifentanil group received propofol 4μg/ml
      and remifetanil 2 ng/ml by target controlled infusion. LMA insertion
      condition was assessed by Muzi’s score (jaw mobility, coughing,
      movement). The time interval to loss of eyelash reflex, to BIS < 60
      and to insertion of LMA were recorded. The BIS and hemodynamic
      changes were measured at preinduction (baseline), preinsertion and
      postinsertion.
      Results: Loss of consciousness and LMA insertion were more rapid
      with remifentanil group than control group (P < 0.05). Clinically
      acceptable insertion of LMA were observed in 35% and 70% of
      patients in the control and remifentanil group, respectively. There
      were significant elevations in heart rate, mean blood pressure after
      insertion of LMA in control group, but no elevations in remifentanil
      group. And there were no significant differences in BIS in both
      groups.
      Conclusions: The LMA insertion with propofol-remifentanil can
      provide more favorable condition and stable hemodynamic status compared with propofol alone.
      번역하기

      Background: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) can be inserted without muscle relaxant in patients who have received propofol. Remifentanil that is recently used opioid effectively attenuates the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy. This study was to inves...

      Background: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) can be inserted without
      muscle relaxant in patients who have received propofol. Remifentanil
      that is recently used opioid effectively attenuates the hemodynamic
      responses to laryngoscopy. This study was to investigate
      the effects of remifentanil on the quality and hemodynamic response
      of LMA insertion after intravenous propofol induction without muscle
      relaxant.
      Methods: Forty patients (ASA I or II, 20-65 years) were randomly
      allocated to control and remifentanil group. Control group received
      propofol 4μg/ml alone, remifentanil group received propofol 4μg/ml
      and remifetanil 2 ng/ml by target controlled infusion. LMA insertion
      condition was assessed by Muzi’s score (jaw mobility, coughing,
      movement). The time interval to loss of eyelash reflex, to BIS < 60
      and to insertion of LMA were recorded. The BIS and hemodynamic
      changes were measured at preinduction (baseline), preinsertion and
      postinsertion.
      Results: Loss of consciousness and LMA insertion were more rapid
      with remifentanil group than control group (P < 0.05). Clinically
      acceptable insertion of LMA were observed in 35% and 70% of
      patients in the control and remifentanil group, respectively. There
      were significant elevations in heart rate, mean blood pressure after
      insertion of LMA in control group, but no elevations in remifentanil
      group. And there were no significant differences in BIS in both
      groups.
      Conclusions: The LMA insertion with propofol-remifentanil can
      provide more favorable condition and stable hemodynamic status compared with propofol alone.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.13 0.13 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.13 0.279 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼